Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Europe UndividedDemocracy, Leverage, and Integration After Communism$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Milada Anna Vachudova

Print publication date: 2005

Print ISBN-13: 9780199241194

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: April 2005

DOI: 10.1093/0199241198.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 23 July 2019

The Endgame of the Negotiations and the Future of an Enlarged European Union

The Endgame of the Negotiations and the Future of an Enlarged European Union

Chapter:
(p.223) 8 The Endgame of the Negotiations and the Future of an Enlarged European Union
Source:
Europe Undivided
Author(s):

Milada Anna Vachudova (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0199241198.003.0009

Ten new members, eight of them post-communist states, joined the EU on 1 May 2004. This chapter takes up three issues that will shape the future of an enlarged EU. First, the EU’s active leverage has had a substantial impact on the political and economic institutions of the new members: has it promoted robust democratic institutions and a vigorous economy, as I have argued, or did it in fact undermine them? Second, the endgame of the negotiations forced unfavourable terms of accession onto the new members: will these unfavourable terms translate into a permanent second-class status? Or will the new members, bargaining hard to improve their position and importing diversity, bring European integration to a standstill? I argue that both concerns are overblown. Third, why did the EU decide to enlarge to these eight post-communist states, and how much further it is likely to go? The EU’s active leverage has been working in parts of the Western Balkans and in Turkey, and it could work elsewhere. The costs of foreclosing future membership for countries such as Turkey, Ukraine, or Belarus could be substantial, yet EU elites and publics are far from reconciled to further enlargements.

Keywords:   accession negotiations, asymmetry of power, bargaining, Common Agricultural Policy, enlargement, Europeanization, quality of democracy, Schengen, Structural and Cohesion Funds, transition periods, Turkey, Western Balkans

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .