Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Torbjörn Bergman

Print publication date: 2003

Print ISBN-13: 9780198297840

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2005

DOI: 10.1093/019829784X.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 19 July 2019

Sweden: From Separation of Power to Parliamentary Supremacy—and Back Agai n ?

Sweden: From Separation of Power to Parliamentary Supremacy—and Back Agai n ?

Chapter:
(p.594) 20 Sweden: From Separation of Power to Parliamentary Supremacy—and Back Again?
Source:
Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies
Author(s):

Torbjörn Bergman (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/019829784X.003.0020

While far from perfect, for much of the post-war period the Swedish chain of democratic delegation and accountability has not been affected by serious agency problems. Fierce electoral competition between two clearly defined blocs and two alternative visions of society allowed voters to be reasonably sure that elections would impact on the direction of national politics. At the same time, the minority status of most cabinets allowed for moderation in policy decisions. Since the late 1980s, however, Swedish politicians have increasingly been faced with distrust, lower electoral turnout, and a loss of party members. It is possible that the growing discrepancy between de facto power relations and the ideal-typical Constitution contributes to a declining popular trust in politicians and political parties.

Keywords:   advisory referendums, interpellation, minority government, negative parliamentarism, neo-corporatism, non-binding primaries, ombudsman, parliamentary scrutiny, transparency

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .