Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Torbjörn Bergman

Print publication date: 2003

Print ISBN-13: 9780198297840

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2005

DOI: 10.1093/019829784X.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 22 July 2019

Luxembourg: A Case of More ‘Direct’ Delegation and Accountabilit y

Luxembourg: A Case of More ‘Direct’ Delegation and Accountabilit y

Chapter:
(p.474) 15 Luxembourg: A Case of More ‘Direct’ Delegation and Accountability
Source:
Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies
Author(s):

Patrick Dumont

Lieven De Winter

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/019829784X.003.0015

Featuring an indirect chain of delegation and a reasonable correspondence to the singularity principle, the Grand Dutchy of Luxembourg presents a number of characteristics that approximate the ideal type of parliamentary democracy. The country is a unitary parliamentary monarchy with a unicameral Parliament, and it has never used a referendum in the post-war period. Yet, a number of domestic institutions and policy-making procedures deviate from this ideal-typical picture, including collective decision-making within the cabinet and executive-legislative relations. Another constraint has been the country’s involvement in international organizations and arrangements that continuously reduce its sovereignty and thus the significance of the national chain of delegation and accountability.

Keywords:   cabinet stability, constitutional court, interpellations, neo-corporatist professional chambers, panachage voting, parliamentary committee of investigation, unicameral parliament, unitary state

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .