Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The National Co-ordination of EU PolicyThe Domestic Level$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Hussein Kassim, Guy Peters, and Vincent Wright

Print publication date: 2000

Print ISBN-13: 9780198296645

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0198296649.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 21 November 2019

Conclusion

Conclusion

The National Co‐ordination of EU Policy: Confronting the Challenge

Chapter:
(p.235) Conclusion
Source:
The National Co-ordination of EU Policy
Author(s):

Hussein Kassim (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0198296649.003.0012

This concluding chapter has three main aims: to identify the main findings that emerge from the ten country case studies presented in the book; to present an argument about the factors that shape the strategies and structures of national co-ordination; and to draw attention to a number of wider issues on the basis of what the findings suggest. The first finding is that European integration exerts a powerful need for co-ordination on the part of governments and that European Union (EU) policy-making has become an important locus of domestic co-ordination for governments; however, membership of the Union confronts the member states with very specific challenges, and meeting its complex demands is extremely problematic. Second, national responses to the demands of EU membership have led to a redefinition of the functions traditionally performed by some actors and a recasting or recalibration of interinstitutional relationships. Third, there are important similarities between the way in which the member states co-ordinate their European policies, although diversity persists and institutional convergence is limited in scope and extent. The main part of the conclusion presents a cross-national view of the co-ordination of EU policy, looking at similarities and differences and explaining them; the last part presents concluding remarks on the effectiveness of national co-ordination systems, co-ordination as a process, the systemic implications (impact) of the findings, and theoretical issues.

Keywords:   case studies, differences, domestic policy, EU policy, European integration, European Union, institutional structures, national co-ordination, national responses, similarities

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .