Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Electoral Systems and Democratization in Southern Africa$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Andrew Reynolds

Print publication date: 1999

Print ISBN-13: 9780198295105

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0198295103.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 26 June 2019

Defining and Measuring the Trajectory of Democratization

Defining and Measuring the Trajectory of Democratization

Chapter:
(p.20) 1 Defining and Measuring the Trajectory of Democratization
Source:
Electoral Systems and Democratization in Southern Africa
Author(s):

Andrew Reynolds (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0198295103.003.0002

This is the first of four chapters that discusses the theoretical underpinnings of the research on democratization in southern Africa that is described in the book. It qualitatively and quantitatively assesses the trajectory of the five case studies along the lines of their political stability, ethnic accommodation, and the long-term prospects for democratic accommodation. In attempting to find useful indicators of the trajectory of democratization in each of the five country case studies, six possible approaches are considered: political violence (the measurement of politically related deaths), economic indicators, political and societal indicators (political rights and civil liberties; media freedom and influence), electoral indicators (turnout; spoilt ballots), and ethnic accommodation (worsening ethnic and interregional relations, as exemplified by Zambia and Malawi; improving ethnic relations, as exemplified by Namibia and South Africa; and ethnic relations with an uncertain trajectory, as exemplified by Zimbabwe). Eight institutional indices of democratization are chosen from these: ethnic accommodation, political violence, economic performance, civil liberties, political rights, free media, electoral turnout, and spoilt ballots. The findings on these indicators for each case study are summarised in a table.

Keywords:   case studies, civil liberties, democratic accommodation, democratization, economic performance, electoral turnout, ethnic accommodation, ethnic relations, indicators, institutional indicators, Malawi, media freedom, Namibia, political rights, political stability, political violence, politically related deaths, South Africa, southern Africa, spoilt ballots, Zambia, Zimbabwe

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .