Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Technology, Organization, and CompetitivenessPerspectives on Industrial and Corporate Change$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Giovanni Dosi, David J. Teece, and Josef Chytry

Print publication date: 1998

Print ISBN-13: 9780198290964

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0198290969.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 21 August 2019

The Co‐Evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions

The Co‐Evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions

Chapter:
(p.319) 9 The Co‐Evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions
Source:
Technology, Organization, and Competitiveness
Author(s):

Richard R. Nelson (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0198290969.003.0010

There is a large intellectual discrepancy between most formal growth models described by economists and descriptions of growth in economic history. This paper draws on an evolutionary theory of economic growth that brings together appreciative theorizing regarding growth and formal theorizing. It aims to piece together a relatively coherent appreciative theoretical account of economic development at a sectoral level by laying out a story of the growth, and development, of a manufacturing sector, from birth to maturity, and perhaps until death, that seems to fit many cases and which can serve as a target for formalization. The paper first describes and tries to link two broad bodies of appreciative evolutionary theoretic writing: one proposes that a new technology develops along a relatively standard track from the time it is born, to its maturity, and that firm and industry structure ‘co‐evolve’ with the technology; the other is concerned with the development of institutions in response to changing economic conditions, incentives, and pressures. The matter of ‘punctuated equilibrium’ is then considered, before concluding with a consideration of two economic developmental implications that appear to flow from the analysis: the first concerns the pattern of change of productivity, of capital intensity, and relative variables associated with economic growth, as a technology and industry structure develop; the second is concerned with implicitly cross‐country comparisons, and is focused on how ‘comparative advantage’ develops in a new industry.

Keywords:   co‐evolution, comparative advantage, economic development, economic growth, firm structure, growth models, industrial structure, institutional development, manufacturing sectors, new industries, punctuated equilibrium, sectoral growth, supporting institutions, technology, technology development

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .