Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Scientific Image$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Bas. C. van Fraassen

Print publication date: 1980

Print ISBN-13: 9780198244271

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0198244274.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 18 November 2019

Arguments Concerning Scientific Realism

Arguments Concerning Scientific Realism

Chapter:
(p.6) 2 Arguments Concerning Scientific Realism
Source:
The Scientific Image
Author(s):

Bas C. van Fraassen (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0198244274.003.0002

This chapter examines and criticizes the main arguments offered for scientific realism, here identified as the following view: Science aims to give us, in its theories, a literally true story of what the world is like; and acceptance of a scientific theory involves the belief that it is true. In contrast, constructive empiricism, which also opts for a literal understanding of scientific language, is the following view: Science aims to give us theories which are empirically adequate; and acceptance of a theory involves as belief only that it is empirically adequate (but also has a pragmatic dimension, to be elucidated). Topics examined include the ’theory/observation dichotomy’, observable versus unobservable entities, epistemology and the epistemic community, inference to the best explanation, principle of the common cause, and fictionalism. The views of Smart, Sellars, Reichenbach, Putnam, and Dummett are considered. It is argued that the arguments offered for scientific realism, though telling against logical positivism, do not support it over and against constructive empiricism.

Keywords:   constructive empiricism, Dummett, empirical adequacy, explanation, fictionalism, inference to the best explanation, observation, Putnam, Reichenbach, scientific realism, Sellars, Smart, theory/observation dichotomy

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .