Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Light of the SoulTheories of Ideas in Leibniz, Malebranche, and Descartes$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Nicholas Jolley

Print publication date: 1998

Print ISBN-13: 9780198238195

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0198238193.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 20 October 2019

Malebranche

Malebranche

Ideas and Self‐Knowledge

Chapter:
(p.114) 7 Malebranche
Source:
The Light of the Soul
Author(s):

Nicholas Jolley (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0198238193.003.0007

Malebranche is sometimes classified as a Cartesian, but on the issue of self‐knowledge he departs radically from Descartes; Malebranche completely rejects the thesis that the mind is better known than the body. On this issue at least, he belongs, not with Descartes or the other ‘rationalists’, but with the ‘empiricists’ Gassendi, Locke, and perhaps even Hume. Not surprisingly, Malebranche's position on self‐knowledge was subjected to vehement criticism from a Cartesian standpoint; in On True and False Ideas, Arnauld singled out Malebranche's denial that we have an idea of our mind as one of the main targets of his polemic. Among other criticisms, Arnauld argued cogently that, on Malebranche's view, it is difficult to see how we can have knowledge of such vital truths about the mind as its freedom and immortality, yet Arnauld failed to come to grips with Malebranche's central claims. Arguably, Malebranche had more insight into the weaknesses of Descartes's philosophy of mind and for this reason alone Malebranche's discussion of self‐knowledge is an important contribution to the subject.

Keywords:   a priori psychology, Arnauld, freedom, Gassendi, Hume, immortality, knowledge, Locke, Malebranche, McCracken, On True and False Ideas, self‐knowledge

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .