Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Moral Skepticisms$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong

Print publication date: 2006

Print ISBN-13: 9780195187724

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: February 2006

DOI: 10.1093/0195187725.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 20 November 2019

Are Any Moral Beliefs Justified?

Are Any Moral Beliefs Justified?

Chapter:
(p.60) 4 Are Any Moral Beliefs Justified?
Source:
Moral Skepticisms
Author(s):

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0195187725.003.0004

This chapter distinguishes different ways for moral beliefs and believers to be justified: instrumentally or epistemically, permissively or positively, slightly or adequately, and personally or impersonally. It explains the two main arguments against justified moral belief: the skeptical regress argument and the skeptical hypothesis or scenario argument. It concludes that these arguments pose a dilemma because their flaws are hard to detect, and their conclusions are hard to believe.

Keywords:   justified belief, knowledge, Gettier problems, skeptical regress, skeptical hypothesis, skeptical scenario, closure

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .