Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Pyrrhonian Skepticism$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong

Print publication date: 2004

Print ISBN-13: 9780195169720

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2006

DOI: 10.1093/0195169727.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 20 October 2019

Berkeley, Pyrrhonism, and the Theaetetus

Berkeley, Pyrrhonism, and the Theaetetus

Chapter:
(p.40) 3 Berkeley, Pyrrhonism, and the Theaetetus
Source:
Pyrrhonian Skepticism
Author(s):

Kenneth P. Winkler

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0195169727.003.0004

This essay reinterprets Berkeley’s idealism as partially motivated by a need to overcome the Agrippan mode of relativity pressed by Pyrrhonists. It compares Berkeley’s solution to that of Protagoras as presented in Plato’s Theaetetus, and argues that Berkeley needed to depend on reason — intuition or demonstration — to avoid skepticism. In this interpretation, Berkeley is closer to the rationalist tradition than usually recognized.

Keywords:   Berkeley, Pyrrho, Agrippa, Plato, Theaetetus, Protagoras, relativity, rationalism, empiricism, idealism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .