Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Extending OurselvesComputational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Paul Humphreys

Print publication date: 2004

Print ISBN-13: 9780195158700

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: February 2006

DOI: 10.1093/0195158709.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 June 2019

Further Issues

Further Issues

Further Issues (p.136)
Extending Ourselves

Paul Humphreys (Contributor Webpage)

Oxford University Press

Various underdetermination arguments against selective realism are explored and rebutted. The role of abstraction and idealization in templates is explored. The fact that most computational processes are epistemically opaque is emphasized, and the effect that opacity has on scientific knowledge is explained using the Ising model as an example. Arguments are given for emphasizing mathematical form over logical form in the philosophy of science, and for emphasizing methods applicable in practice over those applicable only in principle.

Keywords:   abstraction, idealization, Ising model, logical form, mathematical form, methods, realism, scientific knowledge, template, underdetermination

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .