Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Abortion and Social ResponsibilityDepolarizing the Debate$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Laurie Shrage

Print publication date: 2003

Print ISBN-13: 9780195153095

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/019515309X.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 17 June 2019

Liberty, Equality, and Abortion

Liberty, Equality, and Abortion

Chapter:
(p.41) 2 Liberty, Equality, and Abortion
Source:
Abortion and Social Responsibility
Author(s):

Laurie Shrage (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/019515309X.003.0002

The standard civil liberty defenses of a woman's right to abort involve principles that justify a right somewhat narrower than the right defined by Roe v. Wade. In particular, freedom from social coercion, involuntary servitude, or nonconsensual bodily use do not require six months of unrestricted access to abortion, when women have access to a full range of effective contraceptives, including backup early abortion. Because public opinion on abortion varies in accordance with the gestational stage at which abortions are performed, decreasing the time span for unrestricted abortion, while simultaneously removing restrictions that block women's access to effective birth control and therapeutically necessary abortions, would help to make abortion more widely acceptable. Winning broad public support for legal abortion will not be accomplished by clarifying its constitutional justifications – e.g., the right to privacy, to deny help, or to self‐defense – but rather by promoting women's greater access to reproductive healthcare while simultaneously adopting a moderate regulatory scheme restricting abortions that most offend public sensibilities – especially second‐trimester nontherapeutic abortions.

Keywords:   abortion, birth control, civil liberty, involuntary servitude, nonconsensual bodily use, privacy, reproductive healthcare, Roe v. Wade, self‐defense, social coercion

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .