Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Morality, Mortality Volume II: Rights, Duties, and Status$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

F. M. Kamm

Print publication date: 2001

Print ISBN-13: 9780195144024

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0195144023.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 23 May 2019

Killing and Letting Die: Methodology of Comparable Cases and Conceptions of Moral Equivalence

Killing and Letting Die: Methodology of Comparable Cases and Conceptions of Moral Equivalence

Chapter:
(p.17) 1 Killing and Letting Die: Methodology of Comparable Cases and Conceptions of Moral Equivalence
Source:
Morality, Mortality Volume II: Rights, Duties, and Status
Author(s):

F. M. Kamm (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0195144023.003.0002

Begins by considering the methodology of comparable cases used to test for the Thesis of the Moral Equivalence of Killing and Letting Die (Thesis E). Consideration is given to how to create cases that are properly equalized for all factors besides killing and letting die, analysing how this is done standardly, and also how it might be suggested that it should be done non‐standardly by equalizing cases cross‐definitionally as well as contextually. Arguments are presented against using non‐standardly equalized kill and let‐die cases as test cases for Thesis E, and distinctions are made between a strong and a weak version of that thesis. In addition, consideration is given to whether terminating aid is killing or letting die, and an examination made of Joel Feinberg's views on the right to be aided.

Keywords:   case equalization, equalizing cases contextually, equalizing cases cross‐definitionally, equalizing cases non‐standardly, equalizing cases standardly, Joel Feinberg, kill and let‐die cases, killing and letting die, methodology of comparable cases, Moral Equivalence, terminating aid, Thesis E

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .