Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Maximal GodA New Defence of Perfect Being Theism$

Yujin Nagasawa

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780198758686

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2017

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198758686.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 20 June 2018

(p.209) References

(p.209) References

Source:
Maximal God
Author(s):

Yujin Nagasawa

Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Bibliography references:

Abbruzzese, John E. (1997), ‘The Coherence of Omniscience: A Defence’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 41, pp. 25–34.

Adams, Marilyn McCord (2000), Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Adams, Marilyn McCord and Robert Merrihew Adams (eds.) (1990), The Problem of Evil, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Adams, Robert Merrihew (1972), ‘Must God Create the Best?’, Philosophical Review 81, pp. 317–32.

Adams, Robert Merrihew (1994), Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist, New York: Oxford University Press.

Adams, Robert Merrihew (1999), Finite and Infinite Goods, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Almeida, Michael (2011), ‘Theistic Modal Realism’, Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 3, pp. 1–15.

Almeida, Michael (2012), ‘The Logical Problem of Evil Regained’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 36, pp. 163–76.

Alter, Torin (2002), ‘On Two Alleged Conflicts Between Divine Attributes’, Faith and Philosophy 19, pp. 47–57.

Anderson, C. A. (1990), ‘Some Emendations of Gödel’s Ontological Proof’, Faith and Philosophy 7, pp. 291–303.

Anscombe Elizabeth and Peter Thomas Geach (eds. and trans.) (1970), Descartes: Philosophical Writings, Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson and Sons.

Anselm (1965, originally 1077–8), ‘Proslogion’, in Charlesworth, M. J. (ed. and trans.), St Anselm’s Proslogion, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 101–55.

Anselm (1998, originally 1076), ‘Monologion’, in Davies, B. and Evans, G. R. (eds. and trans.), Anselm of Canterbury: The Major Works, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 5–81.

Aquinas, Thomas (1967, originally 1485), Summa Theologiae, trans. by Thomas Gilby, London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.

Ariew, Roger and Daniel Garber (eds. and trans.) (1989), G. W. Leibniz Philosophical Essays, Indianapolis: Hackett.

Aristotle (1883, originally fourth century BC), History of Animals, trans. by Richard Cresswell, London: George Bell and Sons.

Aristotle (2004, originally 350 BC), The Metaphysics, trans. by Hugh Lawson-Tancred, London: Penguin Books.

(p.210) Augustine (1961, originally 398), Confessions, trans. by R. S. Pine-Coffin, London: Penguin Books.

Augustine (1974, originally 390), ‘Letter 18 to Coelestinus’, in Vernon J. Bourke (ed. and trans.), The Essential Augustine, Second Edition, Indianapolis: Hackett, pp. 45–6.

Augustine (1993, originally 387–9), On Free Choice of the Will, trans. by Thomas Williams, Indianapolis: Hackett.

Augustine (2009, originally 397), On Christian Doctrine, trans. by J. F. Shaw, Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

Baker, John Robert (1983), ‘Religious Experience and the Possibility of Divine Existence’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14, pp. 225–32.

Barnes, Jonathan (1972), The Ontological Argument, London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Barrett, J. L. (2004), Why Would Anyone Believe in God?, Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.

Barrow, John D. and Frank J. Tipler (1986), The Anthropic Cosmological Principle, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barth, Karl (1960, originally 1931), Anselm: Fide Quaerens Intellectum, trans. by Ian W. Robertson, Richmond, VA: John Knox Press.

Bayne, Tim and Yujin Nagasawa (2006), ‘The Grounds of Worship’, Religious Studies 42, pp. 299–313.

Bayne, Tim and Yujin Nagasawa (2007), ‘Grounds of Worship Again: A Response to Crowe’, Religious Studies 43, pp. 475–80.

Beall, J. C. (2000), ‘A Neglected Response to the Grim Result’, Analysis 60, pp. 38–41.

Beaty, Michael and Charles Taliaferro (1990), ‘God and Concept Empiricism’, Southwest Philosophy Review 6, pp. 97–105.

Bishop, John (1993), ‘Evil and the Concept of God’, Philosophical Papers 22, pp. 1–15.

Bliss, Ricki and Kelly Trogdon (2014), ‘Metaphysical Grounding’, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/grounding/> (accessed 22 July 2016).

Blumenfeld, David (1978), ‘On the Compossibility of the Divine Attributes’, Philosophical Studies 34, pp. 91–103.

Boethius (1999, originally 523), The Consolation of Philosophy, trans. by P. G. Walsh, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bohn, Einar Duenger (2012), ‘Anselmian Theism and Indefinitely Extensible Perfection’, Philosophical Quarterly 62, pp. 671–83.

Bourke, Vernon J. (ed. and trans.) (1974), The Essential Augustine, Second Edition, Indianapolis: Hackett.

(p.211) Bringsjord, Selmer (1989), ‘Grim on Logic and Omniscience’, Analysis 49, pp. 186–9.

Broad, C. D. (1939), ‘Arguments for the Existence of God’, Journal of Theological Studies 40, pp. 16–30, 156–67; reprinted in Broad, C. D. (1953) Religion, Philosophy and Psychical Research: Selected Essays, London: Routledge, pp. 175–201 (page numbers refer to reprinting).

Broad, C. D. (1953), Religion, Philosophy and Psychical Research: Selected Essays, London: Routledge.

Buckareff, Andrei and Yujin Nagasawa (eds.) (2016), Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Buras, Todd and Mike Cantrell (2009), ‘Natural Desire and the Existence of God’, unpublished manuscript.

Carr, Bernard (ed.) (2009), Universe or Multiverse?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cartwright, Richard (1994), ‘Speaking of Everything’, Noûs 28, pp. 1–20.

Chalmers, David J. (1996), The Conscious Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chalmers, David J. (2002), ‘Does Conceivability Entail Possibility?’, in Gendler, T. S. and Hawthorne, J. (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 145–200.

Chambers, Timothy (2000), ‘On Behalf of the Devil: A Parody of Anselm Revisited’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100, pp. 93–113.

Chang, Ruth (ed.) (1997), Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Charlesworth, M. J. (ed. and trans.) (1965), St Anselm’s Proslogion, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Cicero, Marcus Tullius (1972, originally 45 BC), The Nature of the Gods, trans. by C. P. McGregor, London: Penguin Books.

Cock, Albert A. (1917–18), ‘The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 18, pp. 363–84.

Copan, Paul and Chad Meister (eds.) (2008), Philosophy of Religion: Classic and Contemporary Issues, Oxford: Blackwell.

Cottingham, John, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch (eds. and trans.) (1984), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Volume II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cray, Wesley D. (2011), ‘Omniscience and Worthiness of Worship’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70, pp. 147–53.

Crowe, Benjamin (2007), ‘Reasons for Worship: A Response to Bayne and Nagasawa’, Religious Studies 43, pp. 465–74.

Danaher, John (2012), ‘Stumbling on the Threshold: A Reply to Gwiazda on Threshold Obligations’, Religious Studies 48, pp. 469–78.

(p.212) Davies, Brian (1998), Philosophy of Religion: A Guide to the Subject, London: Cassell.

Davies, Brian (2004), ‘Anselm and the Ontological Argument’, in Davies, B. and Leftow, B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–78.

Davies, Brian and G. R. Evans (eds. and trans.) (1998), Anselm of Canterbury: The Major Works, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Davies, Brian and Brian Leftow (eds.) (2004), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davis, Stephen T. (1983), Logic and the Nature of God, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

De Cruz, Helen and Johan De Smedt (2014), A Natural History of Natural Theology: The Cognitive Science of Theology and Philosophy of Religion, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Descartes, René (1970, originally 1641), ‘Meditations on First Philosophy’, in Anscombe, E. and Geach, P. T. (eds. and trans.), Descartes: Philosophical Writings, Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson and Sons, pp. 59–124.

Descartes, René (1982, originally 1644), Principles of Philosophy, trans. by Valentine Rodger Miller and Reese P. Miller, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Descartes, René (1998, originally 1637), Discourse on Methods, Third Edition, trans. by Donald A. Cress, Indianapolis: Hackett.

Devine, P. E. (1975), ‘The Perfect Island, the Devil, and Existent Unicorns’, American Philosophical Quarterly 12, pp. 255–60.

Diller, Jeanine and Asa Kasher (eds.) (2013), Models of God and Other Ultimate Realities, New York: Springer.

Dore, Clement (1975), ‘Examination of an Ontological Argument’, Philosophical Studies 28, pp. 345–56.

Dore, Clement (1984), ‘Reply to Professor Baker’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16, pp. 251–5.

Drange, Theodore M. (2006), ‘Review of Jordan Howard Sobel’s Logic and Theism’, The Secular Web, URL= <http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/theodore_drange/sobel.html> (accessed 22 July 2016).

Eadmer (1962, originally 1124), The Life of St Anselm: Archbishop of Canterbury, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Flint, Thomas P. and Alfred J. Freddoso (1983), ‘Maximal Power’, in Freddoso, A. J. (ed.), The Existence and Nature of God, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 81–113.

Frankfurt, Harry (1964), ‘The Logic of Omnipotence’, Philosophical Review 73, pp. 262–3.

Freddoso, Alfred J. (ed.) (1983), The Existence and Nature of God, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. (p.213)

Gaunilo (1965, originally 1078), ‘A Reply to the Foregoing by a Certain Writer on Behalf of the Fool’, trans. by M. J. Charlesworth, in Charlesworth, M. J. (ed. and trans.), St Anselm’s Proslogion. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 156–67.

Geach, Peter (1977), Providence and Evil, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gellman, Jerome I. (1997), Experience of God and the Rationality of Theistic Belief, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Gendler, Tamar Szabó and John Hawthorne (2002), Conceivability and Possibility, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Goldschmidt, Tyron (ed.) (2013), The Puzzle of Existence: Why is There Something Rather Than Nothing?, London: Routledge.

Gombocz, Wolfgang (1973), ‘St. Anselm’s Disproof of the Devil’s Existence in the Proslogion: A Counter Argument against Haight and Richman’, Ratio 15, pp. 334–7.

Grant, C. K. (1957), ‘The Ontological Disproof of the Devil’, Analysis 17, pp. 71–2.

Green, Adam and Eleonore Stump (2016), Hidden Divinity and Religious Belief: New Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Grim, Patrick (1979), ‘Plantinga’s God and Other Monstrosities’, Religious Studies 15, pp. 91–7.

Grim, Patrick (1982), ‘Against a Deontic Argument for God’s Existence’, Analysis 42, pp. 171–4.

Grim, Patrick (1984), ‘There Is No Set of All Truths’, Analysis 44, pp. 206–8.

Grim, Patrick (1986), ‘On Sets and Scenarios: A Reply to Menzel’, Analysis 46, pp. 186–91.

Grim, Patrick (1990), ‘On Omniscience and a “Set of All Truths”: A Reply to Bringsjord’, Analysis 50, pp. 271–6.

Grim, Patrick (1991), The Incomplete Universe: Totality, Knowledge and Truth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Grim, Patrick (2000), ‘The Being That Knew Too Much’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 47, pp. 141–54.

Grim, Patrick (2007), ‘Impossibility Arguments’, in Martin, M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Atheism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–34.

Guleserian, Theodore (1983), ‘God and Possible Worlds: The Modal Problem of Evil’, Noûs 17, pp. 221–38.

Guleserian, Theodore (1985), ‘Can Moral Perfection Be an Essential Attribute?’, Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 46, pp. 219–41.

Gwiazda, Jeremy (2011), ‘Worship and Threshold Obligations’, Religious Studies 47, pp. 521–5.

Haight, David and Marjorie Haight (1970), ‘An Ontological Proof of the Devil’, The Monist 54, pp. 218–20.

(p.214) Harrelson, Kevin J. (2009), The Ontological Argument From Descartes to Hegel, Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.

Hartshorne, Charles (1941), Man’s Vision of God, New York: Harper and Row.

Hartshorne, Charles (1961), ‘The Logic of the Ontological Argument’, Journal of Philosophy 58, pp. 471–3.

Hartshorne, Charles (1965), Anselm’s Discovery: A Re-Examination of the Ontological Proof for God’s Existence, La Salle, IL: Open Court.

Hartshorne, Charles and William L. Reese (1953), Philosophers Speak of God, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Harwood, Robin (1999), ‘Polytheism, Pantheism, and the Ontological Argument’, Religious Studies 35, pp. 477–91.

Hick, John (1966), Evil and the God of Love, New York: Harper and Row.

Hick, John and Arthur C. McGill (ed.) (1968), The Many-Faced Argument: Recent Studies on the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God, London: Macmillan.

Hill, Daniel J. (1998), ‘What’s New in Philosophy of Religion?’ Philosophy Now 21, pp. 30–3.

Hill, Daniel J. (2005), Divinity and Maximal Greatness, London: Routledge.

Hoffman, Joshua and Gary S. Rosenkrantz (2002), The Divine Attributes, Oxford: Blackwell.

Holmstrom-Hintikka, Ghita (ed.) (2000), Medieval Philosophy and Modern Times, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Howard-Snyder, Daniel and Paul K. Moser (eds.) (2002), Divine Hiddenness: New Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, J. P. (1963), ‘The Ontological Argument in Plato’, The Personalist 44, pp. 23–34.

Kahane, Guy (2011), ‘Should We Want God to Exist?’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82, pp. 674–96.

Kant, Immanuel (1929, originally 1781), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. by N. K. Smith, London: Macmillan.

Kenny, Anthony (1979), The God of the Philosophers, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kirk, Robert (2005), Zombies and Consciousness, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kordig, Carl R. (1981), ‘A Deontic Argument for God’s Existence’, Noûs 15, pp. 207–8.

Kraay, Klaas (2008), ‘Creation, World-Actualization, and God’s Choice Among Possible Worlds’, Philosophy Compass 3, pp. 854–72.

Kraay, Klaas J. (2010), ‘Theism, Possible Worlds, and the Multiverse’, Philosophical Studies 147, pp. 355–68.

Kraay, Klaas J. (2011), ‘Theism and Modal Collapse’, American Philosophical Quarterly 48, pp. 361–72.

(p.215) Kraay, Klaas J. and Chris Dragos (2013), ‘On Preferring God’s Non-Existence’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43, pp. 157–78.

Krauss, Lawrence M. (2012), A Universe from Nothing: Why There is Something Rather than Nothing, London: Simon and Schuster.

Kuhn, Robert Lawrence (2007), ‘Why this Universe?: Toward a Taxonomy of Possible Explanations’, The Skeptic 13, pp. 28–39.

Lachs, John (1963a), ‘Omniscience’, Dialogue 1, pp. 400–2.

Lachs, John (1963b), ‘Professor Prior on Omniscience’, Philosophy 37, pp. 361–4.

La Croix, Richard R. (1993a), What is God?: The Selected Essays of Richard R. La Croix, Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.

La Croix, Richard R. (1993b), ‘Malcolm’s Proslogion III Argument’, in La Croix, R. (ed.), What is God?: The Selected Essays of Richard R. La Croix, Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, pp. 17–25.

Langtry, Bruce (2008), God, the Best, and Evil, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Leech, David and Aku Visala (2011a), ‘The Cognitive Science of Religion: A Modified Theist Response’, Religious Studies 47, pp. 301–16.

Leech, David and Aku Visala (2011b), ‘The Cognitive Science of Religion: Implications for Theism?’, Zygon 46, pp. 47–64.

Leech, David and Aku Visala (2012), ‘How Relevant is the Cognitive Science of Religion to Philosophy of Religion?’, in Nagasawa, Y. (ed.), Scientific Approaches to Philosophy of Religion, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 165–83.

Leftow, Brian (2002), ‘Anselm’s Neglected Argument’, Philosophy 77, pp. 331–47.

Leftow, Brian (2004), ‘Anselm’s Perfect-Being Theology’, in Davies, B. and Leftow, B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 132–56.

Leftow, Brian (2011), ‘Why Perfect Being Theology?’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69, pp. 103–18.

Leibniz, G. W. (1923, originally seventeenth century), Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, Volume VI, Darmstadt and Berlin: Berlin Academy.

Leibniz, G. W. (1985, originally 1710), Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil, trans. by Austin Farrer, Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court.

Leibniz, G. W. (1989a, originally 1676), ‘That a Most Perfect Being Exists’, in Loemker, L. E. (ed.), Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Philosophical Papers and Letters, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 167–8.

Leibniz, G. W. (1989b, originally 1684), ‘Meditation on Knowledge, Truth, and Ideas’, in Ariew, R. and Garber, D. (ed. and trans.), G. W. Leibniz Philosophical Essays, Indianapolis: Hackett, pp. 23–7.

Leibniz, G. W. (1996, originally 1704), New Essays on Human Understanding, trans. by Peter Remnant and Jonathan Bennett, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (p.216)

Leibniz, G. W. (2005, originally 1714), ‘The Monadology’, in Montgomery, G. R. (ed. and trans.), Discourse on Metaphysics and The Monadology, Mineola, NY: Dover, pp. 47–63.

Leibniz, G. W. (2012, originally 1686), ‘Discourse on Metaphysics’, in Loptson, P., Discourse on Metaphysics and Other Writings, Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, pp. 57–102.

Lembke, Martin (2012a), ‘Omnipotence and Other Possibilities’, Religious Studies 48, pp. 425–43.

Lembke, Martin (2012b), ‘Grim, Omniscience, and Cantor’s Theorem’, Forum Philosophicum 17, pp. 211–23.

Leslie, John (1979), Value and Existence, Oxford: Blackwell.

Leslie, John (2001), Infinite Minds: A Philosophical Cosmology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Leslie, John and Robert Lawrence Kuhn (eds.) (2013), The Mystery of Existence: Why is There Anything at All?, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Lewis, David (1986), On the Plurality of Worlds, Oxford: Blackwell.

Loemker, Leroy E. (ed. and trans.) (1989), Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Philosophical Papers and Letters, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Logan, Ian (2009), Reading Anselm’s Proslogion: The History of Anselm’s Argument and its Significance Today, Aldershot: Ashgate.

Loptson, P. (ed.) (2012), Discourse on Metaphysics and Other Writings, trans. by Robert Latta and George R. Montgomery, Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.

Lovejoy, Arthur O. (1936), The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Mackie, J. L. (1955), ‘Evil and Omnipotence’, Mind 64, pp. 200–12.

Mackie, J. L. (1982), The Miracle of Theism: Arguments For and Against the Existence of God, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Maitzen, Stephen (2005), ‘Anselmian Atheism’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70, pp. 225–39.

Malcolm, Norman (1960), ‘Anselm’s Ontological Argument’, Philosophical Review 69, 41–62.

Mann, William E. (1975), ‘The Divine Attributes’, American Philosophical Quarterly 12, pp. 151–9.

Manson, Neil A. (ed.) (2003), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science, London: Routledge.

Mar, Gary (1993), ‘Why “Cantorian” Arguments Against the Existence of God Do Not Work’, International Philosophical Quarterly 33, pp. 429–42.

Martin, Michael (1974), ‘A Disproof of the God of the Common Man’, Question 7, pp. 115–24, reprinted in Martin, M. and Monnier, R. (eds.), The Impossibility of God, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, pp. 232–41.

(p.217) Martin, Michael (1990), Atheism: A Philosophical Justification, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Martin, Michael (2000), ‘Omniscience and Incoherency’ in Holmstrom-Hintikka, G. (ed.), Medieval Philosophy and Modern Times, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 17–34.

Martin, Michael (ed.) (2007), The Cambridge Companion to Atheism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Martin, Michael and Ricki Monnier (eds.) (2003), The Impossibility of God, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

Mavrodes, George I. (1963), ‘Some Puzzles Concerning Omnipotence’, Philosophical Review 72, pp. 221–3.

Mawson, T. J. (2002), ‘Omnipotence and Necessary Moral Perfection are Compatible: A Reply to Morriston’, Religious Studies 38, pp. 215–23.

Mawson, T. J. (2008), ‘Why is There Anything at All?’, in Nagasawa, Y. and Wielenberg, E. (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Religion, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 36–54.

Mawson, Tim (2012), ‘On Determining How Important it is Whether or Not There is a God’, European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4, pp. 95–105.

McGinn, Colin (2000), Logical Properties, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Meister, Chad and James K. Dew (eds.) (2013), God and Evil: The Case for God in a World Filled with Pain, Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

Mele, Alfred R. and M. P. Smith (1988), ‘The New Paradox of Stone’, Faith and Philosophy 5, pp. 283–90.

Miller, Barry (2002), The Fullness of Being: A New Paradigm for Existence, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Millican, Peter (1989), ‘The Devil’s Advocate’, Cogito 3, pp. 193–207.

Millican, Peter (2004), ‘The One Fatal Flaw in Anselm’s Argument’, Mind 113, pp. 437–76.

Millican, Peter (2007), ‘Ontological Arguments and the Superiority of Existence: Reply to Nagasawa’, Mind 116, pp. 1041–53.

Montgomery, George R. (ed. and trans.) (2005), Discourse on Metaphysics and The Monadology, Mineola, NY: Dover.

Moore, G. E. (1936), ‘Is Existence a Predicate?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary 15, pp. 154–88.

Morris, Thomas V. (1984), ‘The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Anselm’, Faith and Philosophy 1, pp. 177–87, reprinted in Morris, T. V. (ed.), Anselmian Explorations, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 10–25 (page numbers refer to reprinting).

Morris, Thomas V. (1986), The Logic of God Incarnate, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

(p.218) Morris, Thomas V. (1987a), Anselmian Explorations, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Morris, Thomas V. (1987b), ‘Perfect Being Theology’, Noûs 21, pp. 19–30.

Morriston, Wes (2001a), ‘Omnipotence and Necessary Moral Perfection: Are They Compatible?’, Religious Studies 37, pp. 143–60.

Morriston, Wes (2001b), ‘Omnipotence and the Anselmian God’, Philo 4, pp. 7–20.

Morriston, Wes (2002), ‘Omnipotence and the Power to Choose: A Reply to Wielenberg’, Faith and Philosophy 19, pp. 358–67.

Morriston, Wes (2003), ‘Are Omnipotence and Necessary Moral Perfection Compatible?: Reply to Mawson’, Religious Studies 39, pp. 441–9.

Moser, Paul (2002), ‘Cognitive Idolatry and Divine Hiding’, in Howard-Snyder, D. and Moser, P. K. (eds.), Divine Hiddenness: New Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 120–48.

Nagasawa, Yujin (2007), ‘Millican on the Ontological Argument’, Mind 116, pp. 1027–40.

Nagasawa, Yujin (2008a), God and Phenomenal Consciousness: A Novel Approach to the Knowledge Arguments, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nagasawa, Yujin (2008b), ‘A New Defence of Perfect Being Theism’, Philosophical Quarterly 58, pp. 577–96.

Nagasawa, Yujin (2011), ‘Anselmian Theism’, Philosophy Compass 6, pp. 564–71.

Nagasawa, Yujin (ed.) (2012), Scientific Approaches to Philosophy of Religion, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Nagasawa, Yujin (2013a), ‘Models of Anselmian Theism’, Faith and Philosophy 30, pp. 3–25.

Nagasawa, Yujin (2013b), ‘Maximal God and the Problem of Evil’, in Diller, J. and Kasher, A., Models of God and Other Ultimate Realities, New York: Springer, pp. 233–43.

Nagasawa, Yujin (2016a), ‘Modal Panentheism’, in Buckareff, A. and Nagasawa, Y. (eds.), Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 91–105.

Nagasawa, Yujin (2016b), ‘Hiddenness, Silence and Shusaku Endo’, in Green, A. and Stump, E. (eds.), Hidden Divinity and Religious Belief: New Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 246–59.

Nagasawa, Yujin and Erik Wielenberg (eds.) (2008), New Waves in Philosophy of Religion, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Nagel, Thomas (1997), The Last Word, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nelson, Michael (2012), ‘Existence’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/existence/> (accessed 22 July 2016).

(p.219) Nozick, Robert (2001), Invariances: The Structure of the Objective World, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

Oppy, Graham (1995), Ontological Argument and Belief in God, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oppy, Graham (1996), ‘Gödelian Ontological Argument’, Analysis 56, pp. 226–30.

Oppy, Graham (1997), ‘Pantheism, Quantification and Mereology’, The Monist 80, pp. 320–36.

Oppy, Graham (2006), Arguing About Gods, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oppy, Graham (2008), ‘The Ontological Argument’, in Copan, P. and Meister, C. (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: Classic and Contemporary Issues, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 112–26.

Oppy, Graham (2011), ‘Perfection, Near-Perfection, Maximality, and Perfect Being Theism’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69, pp. 119–38.

Parfit, Derek (1998), ‘Why Anything? Why This?’, London Review of Books 20, no. 2, pp. 24–7 and no. 3, pp. 22–5.

Peterson, Michael L. (ed.) (1992), The Problem of Evil: Selected Readings, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Pike, Nelson (1969), ‘Omnipotence and God’s Ability to Sin’, American Philosophical Quarterly 6, pp. 208–16.

Plantinga, Alvin (ed.) (1965), The Ontological Argument from St. Anselm to Contemporary Philosophers, New York: Anchor Book.

Plantinga, Alvin (1974a), God, Freedom and Evil, London: George Allen and Unwin.

Plantinga, Alvin (1974b), The Nature of Necessity, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Plantinga, Alvin and Patrick Grim (1993), ‘Truth, Omniscience, and Cantorian Arguments: An Exchange’, Philosophical Studies 71, pp. 267–306.

Plato (1992, originally 380 BC), Republic, trans. by G. M. A. Grube and rev. by C. D. C. Reeve, Indianapolis: Hackett.

Pope, Alexander (1994, 1733–4), Essay on Man and Other Poems, New York: Dover Publications.

Power, William L. (1992), ‘Ontological Arguments for Satan and Other Evil Beings’, Dialogue 31, pp. 667–76.

Prior, A. N. (1963), ‘Rejoinder to Professor Lachs on Omniscience’, Philosophy 37, pp. 365–6.

Proclus (1992, originally fifth century), Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides, trans. by Glenn R. Morrow and John M. Dillion, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Pruss, Alexander R. (2001), ‘Śaṃkara’s Principle and Two Ontomystical Arguments’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 49, pp. 111–20.

(p.220) Pruss, Alexander R. (2010), ‘The Ontological Argument and the Motivational Centers of Lives’, Religious Studies 46, pp. 233–49.

Rea, Michael (2015), Evil and the Hiddenness of God, Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.

Richman, Robert J. (1958), ‘The Ontological Proof of the Devil’, Philosophical Studies 9, pp. 63–4.

Richman, Robert J. (1960), ‘The Devil and Dr. Waldman’, Philosophical Studies 11, pp. 78–80.

Richman, Robert J. (1976), ‘A Serious Look at the Ontological Argument’, Ratio 18, pp. 85–9.

Rogers, Katherin A. (1993), ‘The Medieval Approach to Aardvarks, Escalators, and God’, Journal of Value Inquiry 27, pp. 63–8.

Rowe, William L. (2004), Can God Be Free?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rundle, Bede (2004), Why is There Something Rather than Nothing?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Savage, C. Wade (1967), ‘The Paradox of the Stone’, Philosophical Quarterly 76, pp. 74–9.

Schellenberg, J. L. (1993), Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Schellenberg, J. L. (2009), The Wisdom to Doubt: A Justification of Religious, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Schellenberg, J. L. (2010), ‘The Hiddenness Problem and the Problem of Evil’, Faith and Philosophy 27, pp. 45–60.

Schellenberg, J. L. (2015), The Hiddenness Argument: Philosophy’s New Challenge to Belief in God, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schloss, Jeffrey and Michael Murray (2009), The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion, New York: Oxford University Press.

Seneca, Lucius Annaeus (2010, originally 62–4), Natural Questions, trans. by Harry M. Hine, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Sextus Empiricus (1936, originally second century), Against Physicists and Against the Ethicists, trans. by R. G. Bury, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Simmons, Keith (1990), ‘On an Argument Against Omniscience’, presented at the American Philosophical Association Central Division.

Slattery, Michael P. (1969), ‘The Negative Ontological Argument’, The New Scholasticism 43, pp. 614–17.

Smith, A. D. (2014), Anselm’s Other Argument, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Smuts, Aaron (2012), ‘The Power to Make Others Worship’, Religious Studies 48, pp. 221–37.

(p.221) Sobel, Jordan Howard (2004), Logic and Theism: Arguments For and Against Beliefs in God, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Steinhart, Eric (2004), ‘Pantheism and Current Ontology’, Religious Studies 40, pp. 63–80.

Szatkowski, Miroslaw (ed.) (2013), Ontological Proofs Today, Berlin: De Gruyter.

Tillyard, E. M. W. (1972, originally 1942), The Elizabethan World Picture, New York: Vintage Books.

Todd, Patrick (2015), ‘The Greatest Possible Being Needn’t Be Anything Impossible’, Religious Studies 51, pp. 531–42.

Trakakis, Nick (2007), The God Beyond Belief: In Defence of William Rowe’s Evidential Argument from Evil, Dordrecht: Springer.

van Cleve, James (1983), ‘Conceivability and the Cartesian Argument for Dualism’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64, pp. 35–45.

van Inwagen, Peter (2002), ‘What is the Problem of the Hiddenness of God?’, in Howard-Snyder, D. and Moser, P. K. (eds.), Divine Hiddenness: New Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 24–32.

Waldman, Theodore (1959), ‘A Comment Upon the Ontological Proof of the Devil’, Philosophical Studies 10, pp. 49–50.

Wang, Hao (1987), Reflections on Kurt Gödel, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wielenberg, Erik J. (2001), ‘The New Paradox of the Stone Revisited’, Faith and Philosophy 18, pp. 261–8.

Wierenga, Edward (2011), ‘Augustinian Perfect Being Theology and the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69, pp. 139–51.

Witham, Larry (2008), The Proof of God: The Debate that Shaped Modern Belief, New York: Atlas & Co.

Wood, Graham (2011), ‘Cognitive Science and Religious Belief’, Philosophy Compass 6, pp. 734–45.

Wykstra, Stephen J. (1984), ‘The Humean Obstacle to Evidential Arguments from Suffering: On Avoiding the Evils of “Appearance”’, International Journal of Philosophy of Religion 16, pp. 73–93.

Zagzebski, Linda (2013), Omnisubjectivity: A Defense of a Divine Attribute, Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press. (p.222)