Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Affective PublicsSentiment, Technology, and Politics$

Zizi Papacharissi

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780199999736

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 26 February 2017

(p.141) References

(p.141) References

Affective Publics
Oxford University Press

Bibliography references:

Adam, K. (2011a, Oct 11). Occupy Wall Street protests go global. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/occupy-wall-street-protests-go-global/2011/10/15/gIQAp7kimL_story.html.

Adam, K. (2011b, Oct 16). Occupy Wall Street protests continue worldwide. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2011-2010-16/world/35278506_1_protesters-violent-clashes-worldwide-demonstration.

Aday, S., Farrell, H., Lynch, M., Sides, J., & Freelon, D. United States Institute of Peace, (2012). Blogs and bullets ii: New media and conflict after the Arab Spring. Retrieved from http://www.usip.org/publications/blogs-and-bullets-ii-new-media-and-conflict-after-the-arab-spring.

Alexander, J. (2011). Performance and power. Cambridge: Polity.

Alhassen, M. (2012, Feb 10). Please reconsider the term “Arab Spring.” Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/maytha-alhassen/please-reconsider-arab-sp_b_1268971.html.

Ardent, H. (1970). On violence. London: Penguin.

Armstrong, C. L., & Gao, F. (2010). Now tweet this: How news organizations use Twitter. Electronic News, 4(4), 218–235.

Armstrong, C. L., & Gao, F. (2011). Gender, Twitter and news content: An examination across platforms and coverage areas. Journalism Studies, 12(4), 490–505.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., & Watts, D. J. (2011, Feb). Everyone’s an influencer: Quantifying influence on Twitter. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining (pp. 65–74).

Barnhurst, K. (2010a). Technology and the changing idea of news: 2001 U.S. newspaper content at the maturity of internet 1.0. International Journal of Communication, 4, 1082–1099.

Barnhurst, K. (2010b). The form of reports on U.S. newspaper internet sites, an update. Journalism Studies, 11(4), 555–566.

Barnhurst, K. (2011). The new “‘media affect’” and the crisis of representation for political communication. International Journal of Press and Politics, 16(4), 573–593.

Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2008). Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: A framework for exploring information control. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(9), 1493–1512.

Barzilai‐Nahon, K. (2009). Gatekeeping: A critical review. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 43(1), 1–79.

(p.142) Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bellows, E., Bauml, M., Field, S., & Ledbetter, M. (2012). Occupy Wall Street: Examining a current event as it happens. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 24(4), 18–22.

Bennett, W. L. (1996). An introduction to journalism norms and representations of politics. Political Communication, 13, 373–384.

Bennett, W. L. (1998). The uncivic culture: Communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics. PS: Political science and politics, 31(4), 741–761.

Bennett, W. L. (2004). Branded political communication: Lifestyle politics, logo campaigns, and the rise of global citizenship. In M. Micheletti, A. Follesdal, & D. Stolle (Eds.) Politics, products and markets: Exploring political consumerism, past and present (pp. 101–125). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2011). Digital media and the personalization of collective action: Social technology and the organization of protests against the global economic crisis. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 770–799.

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Berlant, L. (2009). Affect, noise, silence, protest: Ambient citizenship. Talk delivered at the mini-plenary Keywords: The Public Sphere, Public Culture and Reasoned Public Choice. 59th Annual ICA Conference, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from http://publicsphere.ssrc.org/berlant-affect-noise-silence-protest-ambient-citizenship/

Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Berry, C., Kim, S., & Spigel, L. (2010). Electronic elswheres: Media technology and the experience of social space. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Bertelsen, L., & Murphie, A. (2010). An ethics of everyday infinities and powers: Felix Guattari on affect and the refrain. In M. Gregg and G. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 138–157). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Bimber, B. (1998). The Internet and political transformation: Populism, community, and accelerated pluralism.Polity, 31(1), 133–160.

Boczkowski, P. J. (2010). News at work: Imitation at an age of information abundance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published 1972).

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

boyd, d. (2008). Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked publics (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley, School of Information. Retrieved from http://www.danah.org/papers.

boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). London: Routledge.

boyd, d., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. Paper presented at HICSS-43 (Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences), IEEE, Kauai, HI. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2010.412.

Brock, A. (2012). From the blackhand side: Twitter as a cultural conversation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 529–549.

Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond. From production to produsage. New York: Peter Lang.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

(p.143) Cagle, S. (2012, Feb 6). Occupying the “Wall Street Journal.” The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/02/occupying-the-wall-street-journal/252601/.

Calhoun, C. (1992). Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Calhoun, C. (1994). Social theory and the politics of identity. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Social theory and the politics of identity (pp. 9–36). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope. Cambridge: Polity.

Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, K. (2010). Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. Paper presented at the Fourth International Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington, DC.

Chadwick, A. (2008). Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 5(1), 9–41.

Chadwick, A. (2011a). The political information cycle in a hybrid news system: The British prime minister and the “Bullygate” affair. International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(1), 3–29.

Chadwick, A. (2011b). Britain’s first live televised party leaders’ debate: From the news cycle to the political information cycle. Parliamentary Affairs, 64(1), 24–44.

Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. London: Oxford University Press.

Chen, G. M. (2010). Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 755–762. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.023.

Christensen, C. (2009). Iran: Networked dissent. Le Monde diplomatique. Retrieved from http://mondediplo.com/blogs/iran-networked-dissent.

Coleman, S. (2013). How voters feel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Colleoni, E. (2013, May). Beyond the differences: The use of empty signifiers as organizing device in the #occupy movement. Paper presented at the workshop Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics, University of Milan.

Corman, S., & Dooley, K. (2006). Crawdad text analysis system 1.2. Chandler, AZ: CrawdadTechnologies, LLC.

Corman, S. R., Kuhn, T., McPhee, R. D., & Dooley, K. J. (2002). Studying complex discursive systems: Centering resonance analysis of communication. Human Communication Research, 28(2), 157–206.

Corner, J., & Pels, D. (2003). Introduction: The re-styling of politics. In J. Corner & D. Pels (Eds.), Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity and cynicism (pp. 1–18). London: Sage.

Couldry, N. (2004). Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics, 14(2), 115–132.

Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. London: Sage.

Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Cambridge: Polity.

Crawford, K. (2009). Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 23(4), 525–535.

Creamer, M. (2011, Oct 10). Occupiers on Wall Street as Madison Avenue parties on. Advertising Age. Retrieved from http://adage.com/article/news/occupiers-wall-street-madison-avenue-parties/230309/.

Curran, J., Fenton, N., & Freedman, D. (2012). Misunderstanding the internet. London: Routledge.

Dahlberg, L. (2009). Libertarian cyber-utopianism and globalization. In C. El-Ojeili & P. Hayden (Eds.), Utopia and globalization (pp. 176–189). London: Palgrave.

(p.144) Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, rationality and the human brain. New York: Putnam.

Dean, J. (2010). Affective networks. Media Tropes eJournal, 2(2), 19–44.

Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations, 1972–1990. New York: Columbia University Press.

Deleuze, G. (1997). Essays critical and clinical. (D. Smith and M. A. Greco, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, P. F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Originally published 1980).

Derrida, J. (1978). The theater of cruelty and the closure of representation. In Writing and difference. (A. Bass, Trans., pp. 232–250). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Originally published 1967).

Deuze, M. (2012). Media life. Cambridge: Polity.

Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Dumenco, S., & Wheaton, K. (2011, Oct 24). At the New York Times, reproach for one-percenters that have been keeping paper afloat. Advertising Age, 82(38), 13. Retrieved from http://adage.com/article/the-media-guy/nytimes-reproach-percenters-keeping-paper-afloat/230584/.

Ellison, N., Lampe, C., Steinfield, C., & Vitak, J. (2010). “With a little help from my friends”: How social network sites affect social capital processes. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 124–145). New York: Routledge.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.

Erickson, I. (2010). Geography and community: New forms of interaction among people and places. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(8), 1194–1207.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.

Fiske, J. (1987). Television culture. New York: Routledge.

Fraser, N. (1987). What’s critical about critical theory? The case of Habermas and gender. In S. Benhabib & D.Cornell (Eds.), Feminism as critique (pp. 31–56). Cambridge: Polity.

Galloway, A. R. (2012). The interface effect. Cambridge: Polity.

Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba, and Cyprus in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 64–90.

Gandel, S. (2011). The leaders of a leaderless movement. In What is Occupy? Inside the global movement. New York: TIME Books.

Gans, H. J. (1984). Deciding what’s news. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.

Gauntlett, D. (2002). Media, gender and identity: An introduction. London: Routledge.

Gautney, H. (2012). Occupy x: Repossession by occupation. South Atlantic Quarterly, 111(3), 597–607.

Gergen, K. J. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London: Pluto Books.

Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradictions in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. London: Profile.

(p.145) Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Gladwell, M. (2011, Feb 2). Does Egypt need Twitter? The New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2011/02/does-egypt-need-twitter.html.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.

Gould, D. (2009). Moving politics: Emotion and ACT UP’s fight against AIDS. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gould, D. (2010). On affect and protest. In A. Cvetkovich, A. Reynolds, & J. Staiger (Eds.), Political emotions (pp. 18–44). London: Routledge.

Graeff, E. (2013, March). Click, meme, hack, change: Civic media theory & practice. Panel presentation at Digital Media and Learning Conference on Democratic Futures, Chicago, IL.

Grazian, D. (2007). The girl hunt: Urban nightlife and the performance of masculinity as collective activity. Symbolic Interaction, 30(2), 221–243.

Grazian, D. (2008). On the make: The hustle of urban nightlife. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gregg, M. (2011). Work’s intimacy. Cambridge: Polity.

Grossberg, L. (1997). Bringing it all back home. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Grusin, R. (2010). Premediation: Affect and mediality after 9/11. New York: Palgrave.

Gruzd, A., Wellman, B., & Takhteyev, Y. (2011). Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(10), 1294–1318. doi: 10.1177/0002764211409378.

Guattari, F. (1996). The Guattari reader. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of a bourgeois society. (T. Burger & F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Originally published 1962).

Hamdy, N. (2010). Arab media adopt citizen journalism to change the dynamics of conflict coverage. Global Media Journal: Arabian Edition, 1(1), 3–15.

Hamdy, N., & Gomaa, E. H. (2012). Framing the Egyptian uprising in Arabic language newspapers and social media. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 195–211.

Hamera, J. (2006). Performance, performativity, and cultural poiesis in practices of everyday life. In D. S. Madison & J. Hamera (Eds.), The Sage handbook of performance studies (pp. 46–64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hansen, L. K., Arvidsson, A., Nielsen, F. Å., Colleoni, E., & Etter, M. (2011). Good Friends, Bad News - Affect and Virality in Twitter. In Future Information Technology: Proceedings of 6th International Conference, FutureTech 2011, Loutraki, Greece, (pp. 34–43).

Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.

Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York: Penguin.

Harris-Perry, M. (2011, Oct 19). Can Occupy Wall Street succeed as a leaderless movement? The Nation. Retrieved from http://www.thenation.com/article/164074/can-occupy-wall-street-succeed-leaderless-movement.

Hartley, J. (1982). Understanding news. London: Methuen.

Hartley, J. (2002). Communication, cultural and media studies. London: Routledge.

Hemsley, J., Thornton, K., Eckert, J. R., Mason, R., Nahon, K., & Walker, S. (2012, Oct). 30,000,000 occupation tweets: A hashtag co-occurrence network analysis of informa (p.146) tion flows. Paper presented at the Association of Internet Researchers annual conference, Media City, UK.

Henneburg, S., Scammell, M., & O’Shaughnessy, N., (2009). Political
democracy. Marketing Theory, 9(2), 165–188.

Hermida, A. (2010). Twittering the news. Journalism Practice, 4(3), 297–308.

Hermida, A., Lewis, S. C., & Zamith, R. (in press). Sourcing the Arab Spring: A case study of Andy Carvin’s sources during the Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication.

Hess, K. (2013). Breaking boundaries: Recasting the “local” newspaper as “geo-social” news in a digital landscape. Digital Journalism, 1(1), 48–63.

Hohl, M. (2009). Beyond the screen: Visualizing visits to a website as an experience in physical space. Visual Communication, 8(3), 273–284.

Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. C. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. In Proceedings of the Forty-Second Hawaii International Conference on System
Sciences (HICSS–42), (pp.
1–10). Retrieved
from http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/honeycutt.herring.2009.pdf.

Howard, P. N. (2011). The digital origins of dictatorship and democracy: Information technology and political Islam. New York: Oxford University Press.

Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. (2013). Democracy’s fourth wave? Digital media and the Arab Spring. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ifukor, P. (2010). “Elections” or “selections”? Blogging and twittering the Nigerian 2007 general elections. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(6), 398–414.

Ingram, M. (2011, Jan 14). Was what happened in Tunisia a Twitter revolution? Gigaom. Retrieved from http://gigaom.com/2011/01/14/was-what-happened-in-tunisia-a-twitter-revolution.

Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., & Chowdury, A. (2009). Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 2169–2188.

Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. B. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York: New York University Press.

Karatzogianni, A. (2013). A cyberconflict analysis of the Arab Spring. In G. Youngs (Ed.), Digital world: Connectivity, creativity and rights (pp. 159–175). London: Routledge.

Karatzogianni, A., & Kuntsman, A. (2012). Digital cultures and the politics of emotion: Feelings, affect and technological change. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kain, E. (2011, Nov 26). No, the crackdown against Occupy Wall Street is not the work of the shadowy elite. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikain/2011/11/26/no-the-crackdown-against-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-work-of-the-shadowy-elite/.

Kreiss, D. (2012) Taking our country back: The crafting of networked politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama. New York: Oxford University Press.

Westerbarkey, & A. Scholl (Eds.), Kommunikation über Kommunikation. Theorie, Methoden und Praxis (pp. 129–149). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.

Lang, K., & Lang, G. E. (1953). The unique perspective of television and its effect: A pilot study. American Sociological Review, 18(1), 3–12.

Langellier, K. M., & Peterson, E. E. (2006). Shifting contexts in personal narrative performance. In D. S. Madison & J. Hamera (Eds.), The Sage handbook of performance studies (pp. 151–168). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lasch, C. L. (1979). The culture of narcissism. New York: Norton.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Originally published 1974).

Lim, M. (2012). Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. Journal of Communication, 62, 231–248.

(p.147) Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10(3), 393–411.

MacKuen, M., Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & Keele, L. (2007). The third way: The theory of affective intelligence and American democracy. In W. E Neuman, G. E. Marcus, M. MacKuen, & A. N. Crigler (Eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 124–151). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Madison, D. S., & Hamera, J. (2006). Introduction: Performance studies at the intersections. In D. S. Madison & J. Hamera (Eds.), The Sage handbook of performance studies (pp. xi–xxv). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 20(10), 1–20.

Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Massumi, B. (2010). The political ontology of threat. In M. Gregg and G. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 52–70). Durham, NC: Duke University Press

McQuail, D. (2002). Mass communication theory. London: Sage.

Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 138–166.

Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.

Miller, C. L., & Taylor, J. (2006). The constructed self: Strategic and aesthetic choices in autobiographical performance. In D. S. Madison & J. Hamera (Eds.), The Sage handbook of performance studies (pp. 169–187). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Morozov, E. (2011, March 7). Facebook and Twitter are just places revolutionaries go. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/07/facebook‐twitter‐revolutionaries‐cyber‐utopians.

Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.

Moynihan, C. (2012, Jan 11). Barricades come down at Zuccotti Park. New York Times. Retrieved from http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/11/barricades-come-down-at-zuccotti-park/?ref=colinmoynihan&_r=0.

Muñoz, J. E. (2006). Stages: Queers, punks, and the utopian performative. In D. S. Madison & J. Hamera (Eds.), The Sage handbook of performance studies (pp. 9–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Naaman, M., Becker, H., & Gravano, L. (2011). Hip and trendy: Characterizing emerging trends on Twitter. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(5), 902–918.

Naaman, M., Boase, J., & Lai, C. H. (2010, Feb). Is it really about me? Message content in social awareness streams. Paper presented at CSCW (Computer Supported Cooperative Work) 2010, Savannah, GA. doi: 10.1145/1718918.1718953.

Nakamura, L. (1995). Race in/for cyberspace: Identity tourism and racial passing on the internet. Works and Days, 13, 181–193.

Naureckas, J. (2011, Nov 1). They are the 1 percent: Corporate media slow to wake up to Wall Street protests. Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. Retrieved from http://fair.org/extra-online-articles/they-are-the-1-percent/.

Neff, G., & Stark, D. (2004). Permanently beta: Responsive organization in the Internet era. In P. Howard & S. Jones (Eds.), Society online: The Internet in context (pp. 173–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Nerone, J., & Barnhurst, K. (2001). Beyond modernism: Digital design, Americanization & the future of newspaper form. New Media & Society, 3(4), 467–482.

(p.148) Neuman, W. R., Marcus, G. E., Crigler, A. N., & MacKuen, M. (2007). Theorizing affect’s effects. In W. E Neuman, G. E. Marcus, M. MacKuen, & A. N. Crigler (Eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 1–20). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Oldenburg, R. (1997). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.

Oliveira, M., & Murphy, P. (2009). The leader as the face of a crisis: Philip Morris’ CEO’s speeches during the 1990s. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(4), 361–380.

Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing the word. New York: Methuen.

Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4(1), 9–27.

Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Cambridge: Polity.

Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on #egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266–282.

Papacharissi, Z., & Easton, E. (2013). In the habitus of the new: Agency, structure, and the social media habitus. In J. Hartley, J. Burgess, and A. Bruns (Eds.), A companion to new media dynamics (pp. 171–184). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Papacharissi, Z. & Meraz, S. (2012). Blogging culture. In S. Mazzarella (Ed.), International companions to media studies: Content and representation (pp. 367–385). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Papacharissi, Z., Streeter, T., & Gillespie, T. (2013). Culture digitally: Habitus of the new. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 57(4), 596–607.

Park, D. W. (2009). Pierre Bourdieu’s habitus and the economy of the media. Democratic Communiqué. 23(1), 1–21.

Parks, M. (2010). Social network sites as virtual communities. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 105–123). New York: Routledge.

Pearson-McNeil, C., & Hale, T. (2011). Dissecting diversity: Understanding the ethnic consumer. Nielsen Wire [blog]. Retrieved from http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/dissecting-diversity- understanding-the -ethnic-consumer.

Perreault, W., & Leigh, L. (1989). Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(2), 135–148.

Phelan, P. (1993). Unmarked: The politics of performance. New York: Routledge.

Polletta, F. (2006). It was like a fever: Storytelling in protest and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Protevi, J. (2009). Political affect: Connecting the social and the somatic. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Raynes-Goldie, K. (2010). Aliases, creeping, and wall cleaning: Understanding privacy in the age of Facebook. First Monday, 15(1). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2775/2432.

Reese, S. (2001). Framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In S. Reese, O. Gandy, & A. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 7–31). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Robinson, S. (2009). “Searching for my own unique place in the story”: A comparison of journalistic and citizen-produced coverage of Hurricane Katrina’s anniversary. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Journalism and citizenship: New agendas in communication (pp. 166–188). New York: Routledge.

Robinson, S. (2010). Traditionalists vs. convergers: Textual privilege, boundary work, and the journalist—audience relationship in the commenting policies of online news sites. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 16(1), 125–143.

(p.149) Sajuria, J. (2013, Apr 3). Online social capital and political participation: Does the “online” make any difference? International Studies Association Annual Convention Paper. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2240663.

Scammell, M. (2000). The internet and civic engagement: The age of the citizen-consumer. Political Communication, 17(4), 351–355.

Schandorf, M. (2012). Mediated gesture: Paralinguistic communication and phatic text. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 19(3), 319–344.

Schechner, R. (2002). Performance studies: An introduction. New York: Routledge.

Schechner, R. (2003). Performance theory. New York: Routledge. (Originally published 1977).

Scholz, T. (2012). Why does digital labor matter now? In T. Scholz (Ed.), Digital labor: The internet as playground and factory (pp. 1–10). New York: Routledge.

Schudson, M. (2003). The sociology of news (pp. 69–71). New York: Norton.

Sedgwick, E. K. (2003). Touching feeling: Affect, pedagogy, performativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Sedgwick, E. K., & Franck, A. (1995). (Eds.). Shame and its sisters: A Silvan Tomkins reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Seigworth, G., & Gregg, M. (2010). An inventory of shimmers. In M. Gregg and G. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 138–57). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1991). Mediating the message. White Plains, NY: Longman.

Shouse, E. (2005). Feeling, emotion, affect. M/C Journal, 8(6). Retrieved from http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0512/03-shouse.php.

Sieben, J. (2012). Twittering the #ArabSpring? An empirical content analysis of tweets. (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.grin.com/en/e-book/205832/twittering-the-arabspring.

Singh, V. K., & Jain, R. (2010). Structural analysis of the emerging event-web. WWW ’10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 241–250). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

Solow-Niederman, A. G. (2010). The power of 140 characters? #IranElection and social movements in web 2.0. Intersect, 3(1), 30–39.

Sonmez, F. (2011, Dec 6). Occupy Wall Street police response should be investigated by DoJ, Nadler says. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/post/occupy-wall-street-police-response-should-be-investigated-by-doj-nadler-says/2011/12/06/gIQApt1FaO_blog.html.

Sorkin, A. R. (2012). Occupy Wall Street: A frenzy that fizzled. New York Times. Retrieved from http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/09/17/occupy-wall-street-a-frenzy-that-fizzled/.

Spezio, M. L. & Adolphs, R. (2007). Emotional process and political judgment: Toward integrating political psychology and decision neuroscience. In W. E Neuman, G. E. Marcus, M. MacKuen, & A. N. Crigler (Eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 71–95). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Spinoza, B. (1994). A Spinoza reader: The ethics and other works. (E. M. Curley, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Statistic brain - Twitter statistics. (2013, July 5). Retrieved from http://www.statisticbrain.com/twitter-statistics/.

Steiner, H. (2009). Reference utility of social networking sites: Options and functionality. Library Hi Tech News, 26(5‐6), 4–6.

Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.

Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., & Chi, E. H. (2010, Aug). Want to be retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in twitter network. In Social Computing (SocialCom), 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on (pp. 177–184).

(p.150) Sunstein C. R. (2001). Designing democracy: What constitutions do. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ticineto Clough, P. (2007). Introduction. In P. Ticineto Clough & J. Halley (Eds.), The affective turn: Theorizing the social (pp. 1–34). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Tomkins, S. (1995). Exploring affect: The selected writings of Silvan S. Tomkins. V. E. Demos (Ed.). New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Tufekci, Z. (2011). Tunisia, Twitter, Aristotle, social media and final and efficient causes [blog post]. Technosociology. Retrieved from http://technosociology.org/?p=263.

Tufekci, Z. and Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62, 363–379.

Turner, V. W. (1967). The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Turner, V. W. (1974). Dramas, fields, and metaphors: Symbolic action in human society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

van Dijk, J. (2012). The network society. London: Sage.

van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. New York: Oxford University Press.

van Gennep, A. (1909). The rites of passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Van Zoonen, L. (2004). Imagining the fan democracy. European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 39–52.

Vyzoviti, S. (2001). Folding architecture: Spatial, structural and organizational diagrams. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.

Vyzoviti, S. (2003). Supersurfaces: Folding as a method of generating forms of architecture, products and fashion. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.

Walters, J. (2011, Oct 8). Occupy America: Protests against Wall Street and inequality hit 70 cities. The Observer. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/oct/08/occupy-america-protests-financial-crisis.

Watts, D. J. & Dobbs, P. S. (2007). Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 441–458.

Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227–252.

Williams, R. (1961). The long revolution. London: Chatto and Windus.

Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Williams, R. (1979). Politics and letters: Interviews with the New Left Review. London: New Left Books.

Wissinger, E. (2007). Always on display: Affective production in the modeling industry. In P. Ticineto Clough & J. Halley (Eds.), The affective turn: Theorizing the social (pp. 231–260). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Wood, L., & Kroger, R. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Wu, S., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., & Watts, D. J. (2011). Who says what to whom on Twitter. Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference Committee (pp. 705–714). Danvers, MA: Association for Computing Machinery.

Yalom, I. D. (2012). The Spinoza problem. New York: Basic Books.

Yang, G. (2009). The power of the internet in China: Citizen activism online. New York: Columbia University Press.

Yardi, S., & boyd, D. (2010a). Tweeting from the town square: Measuring geographic local networks. ICWSM ’10: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 194–201). New York: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.

Yardi, S., & boyd, D. (2010b). Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 30(5), 316–327.

(p.151) York, J. C. (2011). Not Twitter, not WikiLeaks: A human revolution [blog post]. Jilliancyork.com. Retrieved from

Zhao, D., & Rosson, M. B. (2009). How and why people Twitter: The role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. Paper presented at the proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, FL. doi: 10.1145/1531674.1531710.

Zuckerman, E. (2011). The first Twitter revolution? Foreign Policy. Retrieved from http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/01/14/the_first_twitter_revolution?page=full.

Zuckerman, E. (2013, March). How do we teach digital civics? Keynote address, Digital Media and Learning Conference on Democratic Futures, Chicago, IL. (p.152)