Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Murder in the CourtroomThe Cognitive Neuroscience of Violence$

Brigitte Vallabhajosula

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780199995721

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2015

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199995721.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 26 February 2017

Chapter 8. The Issue of Evidentiary Reliability

Chapter 8. The Issue of Evidentiary Reliability

Source:
Murder in the Courtroom
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Bibliography references:

Aharoni, E., Funk, C., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Gazzaniga, M. (2008). Can neurological evidence help courts assess criminal responsibility? Lessons from law and neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 145–160.

Anderson, B. M., Stevens, M. C., Meda, S., Jordan, K., Calhoun, V. D., & Pearlson, G. D. (2011). Functional imaging of cognitive control during acute alcohol intoxication. Alcoholism Clinical Experimental Research, 35(1), 156–165.

Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 351 (2002).

(p.301) Babikian, T., Boone, K., Lu, P., & Arnold, G. (2006). Sensitivity and specificity of various Digit Span scores in the detection of suspect effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20(1), 145–159.

Baer, R. A., & Miller, J. (2002). Underreporting of psychopathology on the MMPI-2: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 14(1), 16–26.

Baskin, J. H., Edersheim, J. G., & Price, B. H. (2007). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Neuroimaging in the courtroom. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 33, 239–269.

Bennett, C. M., & Miller, M. B. (2010). How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 133–155.

Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, T. A., Bellgowan, P. S., Rao, S. M., & Cox, R. W. (1999). Conceptual processing during the conscious resting state: A functional MRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 80–95.

Blackstone, W. (1979). Commentaries on the laws of England: A facsimile edition with introductions by Stanley N. Katz. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Borg, J., Holm, L., Cassidy, J. D., Peloso, P. M., Carroll, L. J., von Holst, H., & Ericson, K. (2004). Diagnostic procedures in mild traumatic brain injury: Results of the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre Task Force on mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitative Medicine, 43, 61–75.

Brammer, R. (1997). Case conceptualization strategies: The relationship between psychologists’ experience levels, academic training, and mode of clinical inquiry. Educational Psychology Review, 9, 333–351.

Breau, D. L., & Brook, B. (2007). “Mock” mock juries: A field experiment on the ecological validity of jury simulations. Law and Psychology Review, 31, 77–92.

Breyer, S. (2011). Introduction. In Reference manual on scientific evidence (3rd ed., pp. 1–11). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Brodie, J. D. (1996). Imaging for the clinical psychiatrist: Facts, fantasies, and other musings [editorial]. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 145–149.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Butcher, J. N. (2002). Clinical personality assessment: Practical approaches. Vol. 2 of Oxford Textbooks in Clinical Psychology (pp. 76–95). New York: Oxford University Press.

Canli, T., & Amin, Z. (2002). Neuroimaging of emotion and personality: Scientific evidence and ethical considerations. Brain and Cognition, 50(3), 414–431.

Cecil, J. S. (2005). Ten years of judicial gatekeeping under Daubert. American Journal of Public Health, 95(1), 74–80.

Chapple v. Ganger, 851 F. Supp 1481 (E. D. Wash. 1999).

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 590 (1993).

Dawes, R. M. (2001). Everyday irrationality: How pseudo-scientists, lunatics, and the rest of us systematically fail to think rationally. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Feigenson, N. (2006). Brain imaging and courtroom evidence: On the admissibility and persuasiveness of fMRI. International Journal of Law in Context, 2(3), 233–255.

(p.302) Finn, S. E., & Kamphuis, J. H. (1995). What a clinician needs to know about base rates. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Clinical personality assessment: Practical approaches (pp. 224–235). New York: Oxford University Press.

Fowler, J. S., Volkow, N. D., Logan, J., Wang, G. J., MacGregor, R. R., Schyler, D., . . . Patlak, C. (1994). Slow recovery of human brain MAO B after L-deprenyl (Selegeline) withdrawal. Synapse, 18, 86–93.

Fox, P. T., & Friston, K. J. (2012). Distributed processing; distributed functions? NeuroImage, 61(2), 407–426.

Groenier, M., Pieters, J. M., Hulshof, C. D., Wilhelm, P., & Wittem, C. L. M. (2008). Psychologists’ judgements of diagnostic activities: Deviations from a theoretical model. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 15, 256–265.

Gurley, J. R., & Marcus, D. K. (2008). The effects of neuroimaging and brain injury on insanity defenses. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 26, 85–97.

Henson, R. (2006). Forward inference using functional neuroimaging: Dissociations versus associations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 64–69.

Hofman, P. A., Stapert, S. Z., van Kroonenburgh, M. J., Jolles, J., de Kruijk, J., & Wilmink, J. T. (2001). MR imaging, single-photon emission CT, and neurocognitive performance after mild traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 22, 441–449.

Hom, J. (2008). Response to Bigler (2007): The sky is not falling. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(1), 125–128.

Horwitz, J. E., Lynch, J. K., McCaffrey, R. J., & Fisher, J. M. (2008). Screening for neuropsychological impairment using Reitan and Wolfson’s preliminary neuropsychological test battery. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(4), 393–398.

Hughes, D. G., Jackson, A., Mason, D. L., Berry, E., Hollis, S., & Yates, D. W. (2004). Abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging seen acutely following mild traumatic brain injury: Correlation with neuropsychological tests and delayed recovery. Neuroradiology, 46, 550–558.

Hutzler, F. (2014). Reverse inference is not a fallacy per se: Cognitive processes can be inferred from functional imaging data. NeuroImage, 84(1), 1061–1069.

Jones, O. D., Buckholtz, J., Schall, J. D., & Marois, R. (2009). Brain imaging for legal thinkers: A guide for the perplexed. Stanford Technology Law Review 5. Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 10-09. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1563612

Kamphuis, J. H., & Finn, S. E. (2002). Implementing base rates in daily clinical decision making. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Clinical personality assessment (2nd ed., pp. 257–268). New York: Oxford University Press.

Khoshbin L., & Khoshbin, S. (2007). Imaging the mind, minding the image: An historical introduction to brain imaging and the law. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 33(2–3), 171–192.

Kim, N. S., & Ahn, W. (2002). Clinical psychologists’ theory-based representations of mental disorders predict their diagnostic reasoning and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 451–476.

Kim, Y. K., Lee, D. S., Lee, S. K., Chung, C. K., Chung, J., & Lee, M. C. (2002). 18F-FDG PET in localization of frontal lobe epilepsy: Comparison of visual and SPM analysis. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 43, 1167–1174.

(p.303) Knight, D., Smith, C., Cheng, D., Stein, E., & Helmstetter, F. (2004). Amygdala and hippocampal activity during acquisition and extinction of human fear conditioning. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 317–325.

Larrabee, G. J. (2008). Aggregation across multiple indicators improves the detection of malingering: Relationship to likelihood ratios. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22, 666–679.

Last, J. (2001). A dictionary of epidemiology (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Meehl, P. E., & Rosen, A. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 194–216.

Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, . . . Reed, G. M. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56(2), 128–165.

Moreno, J. (2009). The future of neuroimaged lie detection and the law. Akron Law Review, 42, 717–734.

Müller, J. L., Sommer, M., Döhnel, K., Weber, T., Schmidt-Wilcke, T., & Hajak, G. (2008). Disturbed prefrontal and temporal brain function during emotion and cognition interaction in criminal psychopathy. Behavioral Science and the Law, 26(1), 131–150.

Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 59–63.

Poldrack, R. A. (2008). The role of fMRI in cognitive neuroscience: Where do we stand? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 223–227.

Poldrack, R. A. (2011). Inferring mental states from neuroimaging data: from reverse inference to large-scale decoding. Neuron, 72, 692–697.

Pope, K. S., & Vasquez, M. J. (2005). In How to survive and thrive as a therapist: Information, ideas, and resources for psychologists in practice (pp. 95–100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Pratt, B. (2005). Soft science in the courtroom? The effects of admitting neuroimaging evidence into legal proceedings. Penn Bioethics Journal, 1(1), 1–3.

Pustilnik, A. C. (2009). Violence on the brain: a critique of neuroscience in criminal law. Wake Forest Law Review, 44, 183.

Quick v. State.Tex. App. LEXIS 680 (2011).

Reeves, D. R., Mills, M. J., Billick, S. B., & Brodie, J. D. (2003). Limitations of brain imaging in forensic psychiatry. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 31(1), 89–96.

Roberts, A. (2007). Note, everything new is old again: Brain fingerprinting and evidentiary analogy. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 9, 234–266. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1784359

Rogers, R. (1997). Introduction. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 1–19). New York: Guilford Press.

Rogers, R., Salekin, R. T., & Sewell, K. W. (1999). Validation of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory for Axis II disorders: Does it meet the Daubert standard? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 425–443.

Rosenfeld, B., Green, D., Pivovarova, E., Dole, T., & Zapf, P. (2010). What to do with contradictory data? Approaches to the integration of multiple (p.304) malingering measures. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9(2), 63–73.

Rosenfeld, B., Sands, S. A., & van Gorp, W. G. (2000). Have we forgotten the base rate problem? Methodological issues in the detection of distortion. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15(4), 349–359.

Rosenhan, D. L. (1973). On being sane in insane places. Science, 179, 250–258.

Russell, E. W., Russell, S. L. K., & Hill, B. D. (2005). The fundamental psychometric status of neuropsychological batteries. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(6), 785–794.

Sagan, C. (1997). The demon-haunted world—Science as a candle in the dark. New York: Ballantine Books.

Samuel, R. Z., & Mittenberg, W. (2005). Determination of malingering in disability evaluations. Primary Psychiatry, 12(12), 60–68.

Saxe, L., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1999). Admissibility of polygraph tests: The application of scientific standards post-Daubert. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(1), 203–223.

Schauer, F. (2010). Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law: Contrary to the prevailing view, the suitability of brain-based lie-detection for courtroom or forensic use should be determined according to legal and not scientific standards. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14(3), 101–103.

Skeem, J. L., Louden, J. E., & Evans, J. (2004). Venirepersons’s attitudes toward the insanity defense: Developing, refining, and validating a scale. Law and Human Behavior, 28(6), 623–648.

Snead, C. (2007). Neuroimaging and the “complexity” of capital punishment. New York University Law Review, 82(5), 1265–1339.

Soderlund, H., Grady, C. L., Easdon, C., & Tulving, E. (2007). Acute effects of alcohol on neural correlates of episodic memory encoding. Neuroimage, 35(2), 928–939.

Spitzer, R. L. (1976). More on pseudoscience in science and the case for psychiatric diagnosis. Archives of General Psychology, 33, 459–470.

Stark, C., & Squire, L. (2001). When zero is not zero: The problem of ambiguous baseline conditions in fMRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 98(22), 12760–12766.

Sweet, J. J., Nelson, N. W., & Moberg, P. J. (2006). The TCN/AACN 2005 “salary survey”: Professional practices, beliefs, and incomes of U.S. neuropsychologists. Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 325–364.

Trowbridge, B. C., & Schutte, J. W. (2007). Some problems inherent in neuropsychological testing. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 25(2), 5–34.

United States v. Flaherty, U.S. App. LEXIS 6930 (9th Cir. Nev. 2008).

United States v. Gigante, 987 F.Supp. 143, 146 (E.D.N.Y.1996).

United States v. Gigante, 982 F.Supp. 140, 159 (E.D.N.Y.1997).

Vallabhajosula, B., and van Gorp, W. (2001). Post-Daubert admissibility of scientific evidence on malingering of cognitive deficits. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 29, 207–215.

Van Horn, J. D., Yanos, M., Schmitt, P. J., & Grafton, S. T. (2006). Alcohol-induced suppression of BOLD activity during goal-directed visuomotor performance. Neuroimage, 31(3), 1209–1221.

(p.305) Vloet, T., Konrad, K., Huebner, T., Herpertz, S., & Herpertz‐Dahlmann, B. (2008). Structural and functional MRI findings in children and adolescents with antisocial behavior. Behavioral Science and the Law, 26(1), 99–111.

Volkow, N. D., Fowler, J. S., Wolf, A. P., Hitzemann, R., Dewey, S., Bendriem, B., . . . Hoff, A. (1991). Changes in brain glucose metabolism in cocaine dependence and withdrawal. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148(5), 621–626.

Volkow, N. D., Ma, Y., Zhu, W., Fowler, J. S., Li, J., Rao, M., . . . Wang, G. J. (2008). Moderate doses of alcohol disrupt the functional organization of the human brain. Psychiatry Research, 162(3), 205–213.

Wardlaw, J. M., O’Connell, G., Shuler, K., DeWilde, J., Haley, J., Escobar, O., . . . Schafer, B. (2011). “Can it read my mind?”—What do the public and experts think of the current (mis)uses of neuroimaging? PLoS ONE 6(10): e25829.