Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Race and Real Estate$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Adrienne Brown and Valerie Smith

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780199977260

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2015

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199977260.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 25 April 2019

Racial Covenants and Housing Segregation, Yesterday and Today

Racial Covenants and Housing Segregation, Yesterday and Today

Chapter:
(p.160) (p.161) 10 Racial Covenants and Housing Segregation, Yesterday and Today
Source:
Race and Real Estate
Author(s):

Carol M. Rose

Richard R. W. Brooks

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199977260.003.0010

This chapter explores the role of privately created racially restrictive covenants in American housing segregation. Racial covenants were common in residential deeds in the early twentieth century, purporting to prevent future owners from selling their homes to “non-Caucasians.” These covenants were treated increasingly leniently in the courts for the first forty years of the century. That pattern changed abruptly with the 1948 decision Shelley v. Kraemer, which rendered racially restrictive covenants unenforceable in the courts. Despite Shelley, however, racial covenants continued to be written into new deeds until the practice was made illegal through the Fair Housing Act of 1968. Even thereafter, however, racial covenants continued to appear in real estate records. Today, overt racial restrictions are widely ignored, but they are still very difficult to eradicate from the old records. This chapter gives some possible answers regarding their persistence, including the “sticky” characteristics of Anglo-American property law, as well as the response of real estate and finance professionals to what they have considered to be market demand.

Keywords:   racial covenant, restrictive covenant, housing segregation, Shelley v. Kraemer, Fair Housing Act, real estate records

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .