This chapter argues, first, that we should distinguish between first-personal and third-personal standards or criteria for success in practically rational action. Then, second, it argues that from the standpoint of first-personal, deliberative, practical agency, the relevant criterion for success is the fittingness of our response to the conditions in which we act. The fittingness relation is primitive; it cannot be explicated in terms any more fundamental. The chapter also shows the historical pedigree of the notion of judgments of fit, and considers the phenomenology of the experience of making such judgments as developed by Maurice Mandelbaum.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.