Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Neuroscience and Legal Responsibility$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Nicole A. Vincent

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199925605

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199925605.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 30 March 2017

Skepticism Concerning Human Agency: Sciences of the Self Versus “Voluntariness” in the Law

Skepticism Concerning Human Agency: Sciences of the Self Versus “Voluntariness” in the Law

Chapter:
(p.113) 5. Skepticism Concerning Human Agency: Sciences of the Self Versus “Voluntariness” in the Law
Source:
Neuroscience and Legal Responsibility
Author(s):

Paul Sheldon Davies

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199925605.003.0005

On the conception of criminal responsibility in the Model Penal Code, the notion ‘voluntariness’ looms large. Application of the Code presupposes that most adults, including those likely to serve as jurors, know that we are agents who sometimes “determine” their actions and also know when our actions are the results of our “determinations”. If this crucial assumption is false, then the law cannot fulfil its function. The thesis of this chapter is that, in light of converging evidence from various sciences of the self, we are faced with a potent form of scepticism concerning our capacities as agents and, in consequence, the law is indeed defective.

Keywords:   conceptual conservatism, conceptual imperialism, dubious concepts, directives for inquiry, apparent mental causation, forward model of motor control, naïve realism, theory of mind theory, social intelligence, panic system

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .