Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Memory and Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Lynn Nadel and Walter P. Sinnott-Armstrong

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199920754

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199920754.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 12 December 2017

Evidentiary Independence

Evidentiary Independence

How Evidence Collected Early in an Investigation Influences the Collection and Interpretation of Additional Evidence

Chapter:
(p.142) 6 Evidentiary Independence
Source:
Memory and Law
Author(s):

Lisa E. Hasel

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199920754.003.0006

Evidence collected early in a criminal investigation has been shown to affect the decisions made by criminal investigators, forensic scientists, and witnesses to a crime. The early evidence can spark an array of confirmation biases that affect the collection and interpretation other evidence throughout the investigation. Therefore, one piece of faulty evidence collected early in an investigation can lead to the accumulation of multiple pieces of faulty evidence, which may result in a wrongful conviction. This chapter addresses how distinct pieces evidence collected during an investigation may not be independent of one another. Because of its implications for memory, this chapter largely focuses on how eyewitnesses’ memories can be influenced, leading to the contamination of important evidence that may be presented in a criminal trial. Suggestions are made for decreasing evidentiary interdependence during investigations.

Keywords:   eyewitness, memory, post-Identification feedback, co-witness, evidence interactions, criminal investigators, forensic scientists, confirmation biases, tunnel vision

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .