Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
India’s Reforms: How They Produced Inclusive Growth$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jagdish Bhagwati and Arvind Panagariya

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199915187

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199915187.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 15 December 2018

Growth, Openness, and the Socially Disadvantaged

Growth, Openness, and the Socially Disadvantaged

(p.186) Chapter 5 Growth, Openness, and the Socially Disadvantaged
India’s Reforms: How They Produced Inclusive Growth

Megha Mukim

Arvind Panagariya

Oxford University Press

Critics argue that even as poverty has fallen in aggregate, it has risen among the socially disadvantage groups such as the Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST). The paper challenges these critics by studying the evolution of poverty within the SC, ST, and Non-Scheduled castes over the four thick expenditure surveys conducted in 1983, 1987-88, 1993-94, and 2004-5. The authors find that poverty ratio actually fell for every single group between every two successive surveys in rural and urban areas. During the twenty-one years covered by the study, poverty declined by twenty percentage points for the SC and eighteen percentage points for the ST. The authors also find the poverty levels among different social groups to decline in all major states. They find no evidence whatsoever in favor of the hypothesis that rising incomes or openness have adversely impacted poverty among any one of the groups. As in chapter 4, they find that one or more measures of openness have had a statistically significant and favorable impact on poverty levels in the SC and NS in rural and urban regions and both regions taken together. As regards the ST, they find statistically significant effect of openness on poverty in urban areas only.

Keywords:   SC, ST, poverty, openness, states, expenditure surveys, NSS

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .