Over the last two decades the author of this book has started to make a serious case for pragmatism as the source of a new life in contemporary philosophy. There are some, like this book's author, who view today's analytic philosophy as mired in narrowly focused, technical disputes of little interest to the wider world. What is the future of philosophy, and what would it look like? While Classical Pragmatism—the American philosophy developed by John Dewey, Charles Peirce, and William James in the nineteenth century—has a mixed reputation today, the author of this book admires the way its core ... More

Over the last two decades the author of this book has started to make a serious case for pragmatism as the source of a new life in contemporary philosophy. There are some, like this book's author, who view today's analytic philosophy as mired in narrowly focused, technical disputes of little interest to the wider world. What is the future of philosophy, and what would it look like? While Classical Pragmatism—the American philosophy developed by John Dewey, Charles Peirce, and William James in the nineteenth century—has a mixed reputation today, the author of this book admires the way its core ideas provide a way to prioritize avenues of inquiry. As the book points out, both James and Dewey shared a wish to eliminate “insignificant questions” from philosophy, and both harbored suspicion of “timeless” philosophical problems handed down generation after generation. Rather, they saw philosophy as inherently embedded in its time, grappling with pressing issues in religion, social life, art, politics, and education. The author states that he has become increasingly moved by this reformist approach to philosophy, and the published work included here, alongside a detailed introduction setting out the author's views, provide motivation for his view of the “reconstruction of philosophy.” These chapters try to install the pragmatic spirit into contemporary philosophy, renewing James and Dewey for our own times.