Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The End of Negotiable Instruments$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

James Steven Rogers

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199856220

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199856220.001.0001

What Would a Modern Law of Checks Look Like?

Chapter:
(p. 200 ) 9 What Would a Modern Law of Checks Look Like?
Source:
The End of Negotiable Instruments
Author(s):

James Steven Rogers

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199856220.003.0009

This chapter considers whether it makes sense to base the law of checks on the concepts of negotiable instruments law. The chapter begins with the old story about whether one can write a check on the side of a cow. The illustration is used to show that nothing of significance turns on whether an instrument is or is not covered by Articles 3 and 4. The chapter considers several oddities of check law, such as the rule that a person who indorses a check in blank and loses it faces a significant risk of loss. The chapter shows that the law of checks could be much simpler if it were based on how checks are actually used today, rather than how things might have happened centuries ago.

Keywords:   negotiable instrument, check, check collection, indorsement

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .