Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The End of Negotiable Instruments$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

James Steven Rogers

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199856220

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199856220.001.0001

The Bank Always Loses

Chapter:
(p. 111 ) 6 The Bank Always Loses
Source:
The End of Negotiable Instruments
Author(s):

James Steven Rogers

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199856220.003.0006

Lawyers commonly assume that the bank always wins disputes over unauthorized check transactions. That assumption is backwards. The baseline rule is that banks, as the providers of the check payment system, bear the risk of loss from forgeries. The origins of the “bank always wins” notion are found in an early-twentieth century dispute about the effect of bank failure on collection of checks. Modern deposit insurance and bank regulation have rendered that dispute moot. The rhetoric produced by that dispute, however, still distorts the profession’s sense of the law on matters that remain significant. Indeed, courts have decided cases that are inexplicable but for the implicit assumption that the baseline rule is that the bank always wins.

Keywords:   negotiable instrument, check, anachronism, forgery, bank failure, check collection

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .