Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Catonsville NineAn American Story$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Shawn Francis Peters

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199827855

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199827855.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 14 December 2018

“They’re Proud of It”

“They’re Proud of It”

Chapter:
(p.183) 15 “They’re Proud of It”
Source:
The Catonsville Nine
Author(s):

Shawn Francis Peters

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199827855.003.0015

Assistant U.S. Attorney Arthur Murphy, delivering the opening statement for the prosecution, surprising absolutely no one as he laid out the federal government's workmanlike case against the Catonsville Nine. He told jurors that he would be able to introduce irrefutable evidence showing that the nine defendants had willfully destroyed government records and had interfered with the operation of the Selective Service System. There was no getting around it: the federal government had an airtight case. The tenor and scope of the trial changed completely when it came time for the defense to put on its case. In his opening statement, William Kunstler offered almost a total inversion of Murphy's argument for the prosecution. Unlike the government's attorneys, he wanted jurors to take into account the full context of the defendants' actions. What they had done was indisputable; the Nine freely admitted that they had seized and burned the Selective Service files in Catonsville. “So far as the facts in this case go, we agree with the government. No defendant is going to dispute that the facts occurred as the government says they have occurred,” Kunstler said. “The defendants are not going to deny doing what the evidence shows they did. They're proud of it, and they think it is one of the shining moments of their own personal lives.” But why they had done it? That, the defense attorney argued, was the central issue of the case.

Keywords:   Catonsville Nine, trial, Selective Service System, federal government, William Kunstler, Arthur Murphy

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .