Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Subversion and SympathyGender, Law, and the British Novel$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Martha C. Nussbaum and Alison L. LaCroix

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199812042

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812042.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 17 October 2018

Pious Perjury in Scott's The Heart of Midlothian

Pious Perjury in Scott's The Heart of Midlothian

Chapter:
(p.100) (p.101) 5 Pious Perjury in Scott's The Heart of Midlothian
Source:
Subversion and Sympathy
Author(s):

Julia Simon-Kerr

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812042.003.0006

This chapter examines a legal norm that appears to empower women, arguing that in reality it imposes its own constricting demand for conformity: a woman may manifest strength and agency by refusing its alleged help. Scott's novel concerns a young Scotswoman who refuses to lie on the stand to save the life of her sister, who is accused (wrongly) of child murder, under a (historically real) law that allows acquittal, when a woman has delivered a child and no living child can be found, only if the accused can show that she told someone else about her pregnancy. (She didn't, but she didn't murder the child either.) Refusing to lie, Jeanie then walks barefoot to London to seek clemency for her sister from Queen Caroline. The novel has often been read as a story of female conformity to strict moral norms. Instead, the chapter shows that the novel is a story of female moral agency defying conventional male norms. It investigates the phenomenon that Blackstone dubs “pious perjury,” a practice related to jury nullification, in which people lie to prevent convictions under laws thought unduly harsh. It shows that the reigning norm was that this was a good thing to do. Jeanie, by contrast, asserts her agency and individuality by her determination to tell the truth. Connecting Jeanie's intransigence to Kant's famous essay on lying to the murderer at the door, the chapter investigates its problematic, as well as heroic, aspects. It then connects the phenomenon to contemporary debates over jury nullification and police perjury.

Keywords:   pious perjury, women, conformity, female moral agency, legal norms, lying, jury nullification, police perjury

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .