Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Comparative Law as Transnational LawA Decade of the German Law Journal$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Russel A. Miller and Peer C. Zumbansen

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199795208

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795208.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 19 March 2019

Review Essay—Remarks on Post-Sovereignty and International Legal Neoconservatism †

Review Essay—Remarks on Post-Sovereignty and International Legal Neoconservatism †

Reading Jeremy Rabkin

Chapter:
(p.89) 10 Review Essay—Remarks on Post-Sovereignty and International Legal Neoconservatism
Source:
Comparative Law as Transnational Law
Author(s):

Ignacio De La Rasilla

Del Moral

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795208.003.0022

This chapter reviews the books, Law Without Nations? Why Constitutional Government Requires Sovereign States and The Case for Sovereignty: Why the World Should Welcome American Independence, by Jeremy Rabkin. It presents Rabkin's neoconservative defense of United States sovereignty by attempting to soften the impact of the most rhetorically aggressive aspects embedded in his books. Playing along with his rhetorical, strident spiral risks obscuring far more scholarly substantive considerations that frame his work within a specific contemporary doctrinal trend. To categorize Rabkin's as “untouchable” by stressing the aspects of its partisan political posture that would also gratuitously reinforce the accursed fame that neoconservative legal scholars enjoy within their own academy. Moreover, approaching Rabkin's scholarship without animosity offers additional analytic possibilities beyond simply adding another chapter to the inflated rhetoric of “hegemonic international law” that is so in vogue.

Keywords:   United States, law, sovereignty, constitutional government, sovereign states, American independence, book review

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .