Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
What Will WorkFighting Climate Change with Renewable Energy, Not Nuclear
                        Power$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Kristin Shrader-Frechette

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199794638

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794638.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 July 2018

Answering Objections

Answering Objections

Chapter:
(p.212) Chapter 7 Answering Objections
Source:
What Will Work
Author(s):

Kristin Shrader-Frechette

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794638.003.0007

Chapter 7 answers 8 of the most common objections that nuclear advocates might make to the arguments of the preceding chapters. These objections are as follows: Why did the US even begin using atomic energy, if fission is as expensive and risky as the preceding chapters have argued? Why does France have such an apparently successful atomic-energy program, if fission is as expensive and risky as the preceding chapters have argued? How is it plausible that official government and nuclear-industry cost estimates could err by 400 or more percent, as previous chapters have argued? Why is there now an apparent renaissance of nuclear-power construction, if this technology is expensive, carbon-intensive, and risky, as this book has argued? Why is renewable energy apparently growing so slowly if it is both cheaper and safer than nuclear fission? How can renewable energy possibly take the place of coal or nuclear power—both of which apparently supply baseload electricity—whereas renewables like wind and solar energy allegedly supply intermittent electricity? Given the severity of CC, why isn’t a mixture of various technologies, including nuclear fission (rather than merely conservation, efficiency, and renewable energy alone), a more reliable way to address CC? Why can’t other technologies, such as breeder reactors, address the uranium shortage? The chapter calls these 8 questions, respectively, (1) the US Objection, (2) the France Objection, (3) the Implausibility Objection, (4) the Nuclear-Renaissance Objection, (5) the Growth-in-Renewables Objection, (6) the Intermittency Objection, (7) the Energy-Mixture Objection, and (8) the Uranium-Depletion Objection. The chapter shows all these objections err, that the public has been grossly misled by nuclear-industry PR, and that efficiencies and renewable energy are cheaper, safer, more ethical, and less GHG-emissions-intensive, than atomic power.

Keywords:   coal power, ethics, France, nuclear advocates, United States

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .