Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Managing the Research University$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Dean O. Smith

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199793259

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199793259.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 March 2019

Assessment and Evaluation

Assessment and Evaluation

Chapter:
(p.297) Chapter 17 Assessment and Evaluation
Source:
Managing the Research University
Author(s):

Dean O. Smith

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199793259.003.0017

Judging the performance of a university’s research efforts involves information-gathering assessment and evaluation of the information relative to some standard. Formative evaluation examines on-going progress towards achieving a program’s goals, and summative evaluation examines the program’s outcomes at some end-point. The federal government maintains a database tabulating numerous university descriptive statistics through their Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). Also, the National Science Foundation publishes national research expenditures annually, listing universities in rank order. Institutional evaluation usually involves a comparison of research expenditure rankings relative to a previous year’s position and other universities. Many institutions compare performance to a group of peer institutions with similar statistical characteristics or a separate group of more prestigious benchmark institutions that they aspire to resemble. To obtain an overall evaluation of scholarly performance, university assessment data should be expressed on a per faculty member basis whenever that makes sense. Clients’ comments constitute an informative measure of a service unit’s performance. A more powerful evaluation method, constraints analysis, is recommended especially when qualitative assessments indicate user dissatisfaction with a service office’s performance. The most comprehensive objective measure of a chief research officer’s success at nurturing the university’s research environment is institutional research productivity.

Keywords:   assessment, evaluation, formative, summative, IPEDS, research expenditures, performance, constraints analysis, productivity

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .