Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Managing the Research University$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Dean O. Smith

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199793259

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199793259.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 16 November 2018

Technology Transfer

Technology Transfer

Chapter:
(p.259) Chapter 15 Technology Transfer
Source:
Managing the Research University
Author(s):

Dean O. Smith

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199793259.003.0015

To manage its intellectual property, most research universities have technology transfer offices. Their responsibilities include evaluating inventions for possible patent applications, applying for patents, licensing of intellectual property, and enforcing intellectual property agreements. According to the Bayh-Dole Act, if the university claims intellectual property ownership, it must file a patent application within one year. Factors influencing the decision to claim or waive ownership are discussed. If the university claims ownership, then the technology transfer office files a non-provisional or provisional patent application and negotiates licensing agreements. Universities also generate tangible research property, such novel biological organisms and engineering prototypes. Tangible research property developed using federal funds must be shared openly with all other qualified investigators. Universities usually distribute tangible research property by using material transfer agreements that specify how the material may be used. To facilitate technology transfer from federal laboratories to non-federal partners, including universities, the government established cooperative research and development agreements (CRADAs), which require the university to provide the funds needed to conduct a specific research project. The chapter ends with a consideration of intellectual property generation as a tenure and promotion criterion.

Keywords:   technology transfer, patents, licensing, Bayh Dole, tangible research property, material transfer agreements, CRADA, tenure and promotion

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .