Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Engagement and Metaphysical Dissatisfaction$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Barry Stroud

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199764969

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199764969.001.0001

Causation

Chapter:
(p. 20 ) 2 Causation
Source:
Engagement and Metaphysical Dissatisfaction
Author(s):

Barry Stroud (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199764969.003.0002

This chapter argues that understanding ourselves as believing in causal connections held fully independently of us and our having the responses we do is inconsistent with accepting a negative metaphysical verdict about causation. We do regard the causal connections we believe in as independent of us in that way; no reductionist account that would eliminate the modal element is acceptable. So we cannot accept a negative metaphysical verdict about causal dependence and consistently continue to accept all the things we believe involving causal modal connections between things in the world.

Keywords:   metaphysics, causation, causal connections, causal dependence, negative metaphysical verdict

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .