Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Exit Strategies and State Building$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Richard Caplan

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199760114

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199760114.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 12 December 2017

Competing Normative Visions of Exit

Competing Normative Visions of Exit

Chapter:
(p.261) 14 Competing Normative Visions of Exit
Source:
Exit Strategies and State Building
Author(s):

Ralph Wilde

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199760114.003.0014

This chapter offers a critical evaluation of two ideas in international law and public policy that offer mutually contrasting visions as to the basis on which foreign territorial administration—whether colonialism, administration by states under the League of Nations Mandate and UN Trusteeship systems, occupation by states, or territorial administration by international organizations—should be brought to an end. The first is the “trusteeship” model, whereby foreign territorial administration is understood in terms of remedying some kind of deficiency in local administration. Under this model, the duration of foreign territorial administration is ostensibly tied up with an improvement in the quality of local governance. The second is the “self-determination” model, according to which people have a right to be free from foreign control by virtue of their right to autonomy, regardless of whether local capacities for self-administration are deemed adequate. This chapter discusses the contrasting fortunes of each normative vision in mediating the treatment of foreign territorial administration and what is at stake in choosing between them when determining the basis for exits from foreign territorial administration operations today.

Keywords:   civilizing mission, colonial administration, international law, international territorial administration, mandates, occupation, self-determination, state-building, trusteeship

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .