This chapter answers arbitrariness and vacuity objections to divine command theory without shying away from the hard biblical passages like the binding of Isaac and the conquest narratives, nor opting for a nonliteral interpretation. The chapter rather attempts to show that, though these are undoubtedly difficult passages to understand, they are ultimately reconcilable with our most nonnegotiable moral intuitions. There are indeed recognizably abhorrent commands that God by his nature could never perform, but these Old Testament passages, though hard to make sense of morally, aren't impossible. What is needed is a principled line between the merely hard passages and actually impossible moral scenarios.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.