Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Reasons as Defaults$

John F. Horty

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199744077

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744077.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 25 February 2017

(p.241) Bibliography

(p.241) Bibliography

Source:
Reasons as Defaults
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Bibliography references:

Anderson, Alan, Belnap, Nuel, and Dunn, J. Michael (1992). Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Volume 2. Princeton University Press.

Antonelli, G. Aldo (1999). A directly cautious theory of defeasible consequence for default logic via the notion of a general extension. Artificial Intelligence, 109:71–109.

Apt, Krzysztof, Blair, Howard, and Walker, Adrian (1988). Towards a theory of declarative knowledge. In Minker, Jack, editor, Foundations of Deductive Databases and Logic Programming, pages 89–148. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.

Baader, Franz and Hollunder, Bernhard (1995). Priorities on defaults with prerequisites, and their applications in treating specificity in terminological default logic. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 15:41–68.

Baier, Kurt (1958). The Moral Point of View: A Rational Basis of Ethics. Cornell University Press.

Belnap, Nuel (1979). Rescher’s hypothetical reasoning: an amendment. In Sosa, Ernest, editor, The Philosophy of Nicholas Rescher: Discussion and Replies, pages 19–28. D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Belnap, Nuel, Perloff, Michael, and Xu, Ming (2001). Facing the Future: Agents and Choices in Our Indeterministic World. Oxford University Press.

Brachman, Ronald and Levesque, Hector, editors (1985). Readings in Knowledge Representation. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

Bradley, F. H. (1927). Ethical Studies (Second Edition). Oxford University Press.

Brewka, Gerhard (1994a). Adding priorities and specificity to default logic. In Proceedings of the European Workshop on Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA-94), Springer Verlag Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 247–260. Springer Verlag.

Brewka, Gerhard (1994b). Reasoning about priorities in default logic. In Proceedings of the Twelveth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-94), pages 940–945. AAAI/MIT Press.

Brewka, Gerhard (1996). Well-founded semantics for extended logic programs with dynamic preferences. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 4:19–36.

(p.242) Brewka, Gerhard and Eiter, Thomas (2000). Prioritizing default logic. In Hölldobler, St., editor, Intellectics and Computational Logic: Papers in Honor of Wolfgang Bibel. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Brink, David (1994). Moral conflict and its structure. The Philosophical Review, 103:215–247.

Broome, John (1999). Normative requirements. Ratio, 12:398–419.

Broome, John (2004). Reasons. In Wallace, R. Jay, Smith, Michael, Scheffler, Samuel, and Pettit, Philip, editors, Reason and Value: Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz, pages 28–55. Oxford University Press.

Chellas, Brian (1974). Conditional obligation. In Stenlund, Søren, editor, Logical Theory and Semantic Analysis, pages 23–33. D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Chisholm, Roderick (1964). The ethics of requirement. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1:147–153.

Chisholm, Roderick (1966). Theory of Knowledge. Prentice Hall.

Chisholm, Roderick (1974). Practical reason and the logic of requirement. In Körner, Stephan, editor, Practical Reason, pages 2–13. Blackwell Publishing Company. Reprinted in Raz (1978).

Church, Alonzo (1956). Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Volume I. Princeton University Press.

Conee, Earl (1982). Against moral dilemmas. Philosophical Review, 91:87–97.

Dancy, Jonathan (1983). Ethical particularism and morally relevant properties. Mind, 92:530–547.

Dancy, Jonathan (1991). An ethic of prima facie duties. In Singer, Peter, editor, A Companion to Ethics. Basic Blackwell Publishers.

Dancy, Jonathan (1993). Moral Reasons. Basil Blackwell Publisher.

Dancy, Jonathan (2000). The particularist’s progress. In Hooker, Brad and Little, Margaret, editors, Moral Particularism, pages 130–156. Oxford University Press.

Dancy, Jonathan (2001). Moral particularism. In Zalta, Edward, editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2001 Edition). Stanford University. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2001/entries/moral-particularism/.

Dancy, Jonathan (2004). Ethics Without Principles. Oxford University Press.

Davidson, Donald (1970). How is weakness of the will possible? In Feinberg, Joel, editor, Moral Concepts. Oxford University Press.

Delgrande, James and Schaub, Torsten (2000a). Expressing preferences in default logic. Artificial Intelligence, 123:41–87.

Delgrande, James and Schaub, Torsten (2000b). The role of default logic in knowledge representation. In Minker, Jack, editor, Logic Based Artificial Intelligence, pages 107–126. Kluwer academic Publishers.

(p.243) Delgrande, James and Schaub, Torsten (2004). Reasoning with sets of defaults in default logic. Computational Intelligence, 20:56–88.

Delgrande, James, Schaub, Torsten, and Jackson, W. Ken (1994). Alternative approaches to default logic. Artificial Intelligence, 70:167–237.

Donagan, Alan (1984). Consistency in rationalist moral systems. The Journal of Philosophy, 81:291–309.

Donagan, Alan (1993). Moral dilemmas, genuine and spurious: a comparative anatomy. Ethics, 104:7–21.

Dung, Phan Minh (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77:321–357.

Edmundson, William (1993). Rethinking exclusionary reasons: a second edition of Joseph Raz’s ‘Practical Reason and Norms’. Law and Philosophy, 12:329–343.

Etherington, David and Reiter, Raymond (1983). On inheritance hierarchies with exceptions. In Proceedings of the Third National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-83), pages 104–108.

Fahlman, Scott (1979). NETL: A System for Representing and Using Real-world Knowledge. The MIT Press.

Føllesdal, Dagfinn and Hilpinen, Risto (1971). Deontic logic: an introduction. In Hilpinen, Risto, editor, Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, pages 1–35. D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Foot, Philippa (1983). Moral realism and moral dilemmas. Journal of Philosophy, 80:379–398. Reprinted in (Gowans, 1987b), pages 250–270; pagination refers to this version.

Franklin, Benjamin (1772). Letter to Joseph Priestly. Reprinted in Frank Mott and Chester Jorgenson, editors, Benjamin Franklin: Representative Selections, pages 348–349, American Book Company, 1936; pagination refers to this version.

Gans, Chaim (1986). Mandatory rules and exclusionary reasons. Philosophia, 615:373–394.

Ginsberg, Matthew (1993). Essentials of Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

Goble, Lou (2009). Normative conflicts and the logic of ‘ought’. Noûs, 43:450–489.

Gordon, Thomas (1993). The Pleadings Game: An Artificial-Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice. PhD thesis, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt.

Gowans, Christopher (1987a). Introduction: the debate on moral dilemmas. In Gowans, Christopher, editor, Moral Dilemmas, pages 3–33. Oxford University Press.

Gowans, Christopher, editor (1987b). Moral Dilemmas. Oxford University Press.

(p.244) Hansen, Jörg (2006). Deontic logic for prioritized imperatives. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 14:1–34.

Hansen, Jörg (2008). Prioritized conditional imperatives: problems and a new proposal. Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, pages 11–35.

Hansson, Bengt (1971). An analysis of some deontic logics. In Hilpinen, Risto, editor, Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, pages 121–147. D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Hansson, Sven Ove (2001). The Structure of Values and Norms. Cambridge University Press.

Hare, R. M. (1952). The Language of Morals. Oxford University Press.

Hare, R. M. (1963). Freedom and Reason. Oxford University Press.

Harman, Gilbert (1975). Reasons. Critica, 7:3–18. Reprinted in (Raz, 1978); pagination refers to this version.

Harman, Gilbert (1978). The Nature of Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. Oxford University Press.

Hart, H. L. A. (1948). The ascription of responsibility and rights. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, pages 171–194.

Hohfeld, Wesley (1919). Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. Yale University Press.

Holton, Richard (2002). Principles and particularisms. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 76, pages 191–210. Harrison and Sons.

Hooker, Brad and Little, Margaret, editors (2000). Moral Particularism. Oxford University Press.

Horty, John (1994a). Moral dilemmas and nonmonotonic logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 23:35–65. A preliminary version appears in Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science, J.–J. Ch. Meyer and R.M. Wieringa (eds.), Free University of Amsterdam, 1991, pp. 212–231.

Horty, John (1994b). Some direct theories of nonmonotonic inheritance. In Gabbay, D., Hogger, C., and Robinson, J., editors, Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Volume 3: Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Uncertain Reasoning, pages 111–187. Oxford University Press.

Horty, John (2001a). Agency and Deontic Logic. Oxford University Press.

Horty, John (2001b). Argument construction and reinstatement in logics for defeasible reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 9:1–28.

Horty, John (2001c). Nonmonotonic logic. In Goble, Lou, editor, The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic, pages 336–361. Basil Blackwell Publisher.

Horty, John (2002). Skepticism and floating conclusions. Artificial Intelligence, 135:55–72.

(p.245) Horty, John (2003). Reasoning with moral conflicts. Nous, 37:557–605.

Horty, John (2007a). Defaults with priorities. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 36:367–413.

Horty, John (2007b). Reasons as defaults. Philosopher’s Imprint, 7(3).

Horty, John (2011). Rules and reasons in the theory of precedent. Legal Theory, 17:1–33.

Horty, John and Belnap, Nuel (1995). The deliberative stit: a study of action, omission, ability, and obligation. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 24:583–644.

Horty, John, Thomason, Richmond, and Touretzky, David (1990). A skeptical theory of inheritance in nonmonotonic semantic networks. Artificial Intelligence, 42:311–348. A preliminary version appears in Proceedings of the Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1987, pp. 358–363.

Jackson, Frank (1985). On the semantics and logic of obligation. Mind, 94:177–195.

Johnson, Steven (2008). The Invention of Air. Riverhead Books.

Kagan, Shelly (1988). The additive fallacy. Ethics, 99:5–31.

Konolige, Kurt and Myers, Karen (1989). Representing defaults with epistemic concepts. Computational Intelligence, 5:32–44.

Kornhauser, Lewis and Sager, Lawrence (1986). Unpacking the court. Yale Law Journal, 96:82–117.

Lance, Mark and Little, Margaret (2004). Defeasibility and the normative grasp of context. Erkenntnis, 61:435–455.

Lance, Mark and Little, Margaret (2007). Where the laws are. In Shafer-Landau, Russ, editor, Oxford Studies in Metaethics, volume 2, pages 149–171. Oxford University Press.

Lance, Mark and Little, Margaret (2008). From particularism to defeasibility in ethics. In Potrc, Matjaa, Strahovnik, Vojko, and Lance, Mark, editors, Challenging Moral Particularism. Routledge Publishers.

Lewis, David (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford University Press.

Lewis, David (1974). Semantic analyses for dyadic deontic logic. In Stenlund, Søren, editor, Logical Theory and Semantic Analysis, pages 1–14. D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Little, Margaret (2000). Moral generalities revisited. In Hooker, Brad and Little, Margaret, editors, Moral Particularism. Oxford University Press.

Loui, Ronald (1995). Hart’s critics on defeasible concepts and ascriptivism. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-95), pages 21–30. The ACM Press.

Makinson, David (1994). General patterns in nonmonotonic reasoning. In Gabbay, D., C.Hogger, and Robinson, J., editors, Handbook of Logic in Artificial (p.246) Intelligence and Logic Programming, Volume 3: Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Uncertain Reasoning, pages 35–110. Oxford University Press.

Makinson, David (2005). Bridges from Classical to Nonmonotonic Logic. Texts in Computing, Volume 5. King’s College Publications.

Makinson, David and Schlechta, Karl (1991). Floating conclusions and zombie paths: two deep difficulties in the “directly skeptical” approach to defeasible inheritance nets. Artificial Intelligence, 48:199–209.

Mandelbaum, Maurice (1955). The Phenomenology of Moral Experience. The Free Press.

Marcus, Ruth Barcan (1980). Moral dilemmas and consistency. Journal of Philosophy, 77:121–136. Reprinted in (Gowans, 1987b), pages 188–204; pagination refers to this version.

Marek, Wiktor and Truszczyński, Mirek (1993). Nonmonotonic Logic: Context-dependent Reasoning. Springer Verlag.

McCarthy, John (1959). Programs with common sense. In Blake, D. V. and Uttley, A. M., editors, Proceedings of the Symposium on Mechanization of Thought Processes, pages 77–84. H. M. Stationary Office. Expanded version reprinted in (Brachman and Levesque, 1985).

McCarthy, John (1977). Epistemological problems in artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-77), pages 1038–1044. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. Reprinted in (Brachman and Levesque, 1985).

McCarthy, John (1980). Circumscription—a form of non-monotonic reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 13:27–39.

McCarthy, John (1986). Applications of circumscription to formalizing commonsense knowledge. Artificial Intelligence, 28:89–116.

McCarthy, John and Hayes, Patrick (1969). Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In Meltzer, B. and Michie, D., editors, Machine Intelligence, volume 4. Edinburgh Press.

McDermott, Drew (1982). Non-monotonic logic II. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 29:33–57.

McDermott, Drew and Doyle, Jon (1980). Non-monotonic logic I. Artificial Intelligence, 13:41–72.

McKeever, Sean and Ridge, Michael (2006). Principled Ethics: Generalism as a Regulative Ideal. Oxford University Press.

Moore, Michael (1989). Authority, law, and Razian reasons. Southern California Law Review, 62:827–896.

Nagel, Thomas (1970). The Possibility of Altruism. Princeton University Press.

Nilsson, Nils (1980). Principles of Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

(p.247) Nute, Donald (1988). Defeasible reasoning and decision support systems. Decision Support Systems, 4:97–110.

Nute, Donald (1994). Defeasible logic. In Gabbay, D., Hogger, C., and Robinson, J., editors, Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Volume 3: Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Uncertain Reasoning, pages 355–395. Oxford University Press.

Parfit, Derek (2011). On What Matters. Oxford University Press.

Perry, Stephen (1987). Judicial obligation, precedent, and the common law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7:215–257.

Perry, Stephen (1989). Second-order reasons, uncertainty, and legal theory. Southern California Law Review, 62:913–994.

Pietroski, Paul (1993). Prima facie obligations, ceteris paribus laws in moral theory. Ethics, 103:489–515.

Pollock, John (1970). The structure of epistemic justification. In Studies in the Theory of Knowledge, American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series, number 4, pages 62–78. Basil Blackwell Publisher, Inc.

Pollock, John (1974). Knowledge and Justification. Princeton University Press.

Pollock, John (1987). Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science, 11:481–518.

Pollock, John (1995). Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for How to Build a Person. The MIT Press.

Pollock, John (2007). Defeasible reasoning. Unpublished manuscript.

Pollock, John and Cruz, Joseph (1999). Contemporary Theories of Knowledge. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Prakken, Henry (1993). An argumentation framework in default logic. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 9:91–132.

Prakken, Henry (2002). Intuitions and the modelling of defeasible reasoning: some case studies. In Benferhat, Salem and Giunchiglia, Enrico, editors, Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning.

Prakken, Henry (2005). A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-05), pages 85–94. The ACM Press.

Prakken, Henry and Sartor, Giovanni (1995). On the relation between legal language and legal argument: assumptions, applicability, and dynamic priorities. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-95). The ACM Press.

Prakken, Henry and Sartor, Giovanni (1996). A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4:331–368.

Prakken, Henry and Vreeswijk, Gerard (2002). Logical systems for defeasible argumentation. In Gabbay, Dov and Guethner, F., editors, Handbook of Philosophical Logic (Second Edition), pages 219–318. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

(p.248) Raz, Joseph (1975). Practical Reasoning and Norms. Hutchinson and Company. Second edition with new Postscript printed in 1990 by Princeton University Press, and reprinted by Oxford University Press in 2002; pagination refers to the Oxford edition.

Raz, Joseph, editor (1978). Practical Reasoning. Oxford University Press.

Raz, Joseph (1989). Facing up: a reply. Southern California Law Review, 62:1153–1235.

Raz, Joseph (2000). The truth in particularism. In Hooker, Brad and Little, Margaret, editors, Moral Particularism, pages 48–78. Oxford University Press.

Reiter, Raymond (1980). A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 13:81–132.

Reiter, Raymond and Criscuolo, Giovanni (1981). On interacting defaults. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-81), pages 270–276.

Richardson, Henry (1990). Specifying norms as a way to resolve concrete ethical problems. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19:279–310.

Rintanen, Jussi (1998). Lexicographic priorities in default logic. Artificial Intelligence, 106:221–265.

Ross, W. D. (1930). The Right and the Good. Oxford University Press.

Sartre, Jean-Paul (1946). L’Existentialisme est un Humanisme. Nagel. Translated as “Existentialism is a Humanism” in W. Kaufmann, editor, Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre. Meridian Press, 1975.

Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Harvard University Press.

Schroeder, Mark (2005). Instrumental mythology. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, Symposium I.

Schroeder, Mark (2007). Slaves of the Passions. Oxford University Press.

Schroeder, Mark (2009). A matter of principle. Nous, 43:568–580.

Schroeder, Mark (2011a). Holism, weight, and undercutting. Nous, 45:328–344.

Schroeder, Mark (2011b). Ought, agents, and actions. Philosophical Review, 120:1–41.

Searle, John (1980). Prima-facie obligations. In van Straaten, Zak, editor, Philosophical Subjects: Essays Presented to P. F. Strawson, pages 238–259. Oxford University Press.

Skourpski, John (1997). Reasons and reason. In Cullity, Garret and Gaut, Berys, editors, Ethics and Practical Reason, pages 345–368. Oxford University Press.

Sloan, Allan (1997). Millionaires next door—that is, if your neighbors work for Microsoft. Newsweek (December 8).

Slote, Michael (1985). Utilitarianism, moral dilemmas, and moral cost. American Philosophical Quarterly, 22:161–168.

(p.249) Stein, Lynn (1992). Resolving ambiguity in nonmonotonic inheritance hierarchies. Artificial Intelligence, 55:259–310.

Thomason, Richmond (1991). Logicism, AI, and common sense: John McCarthy’s program in philosophical perspective. In Lifschitz, Vladimir, editor, Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Theory of Computation, pages 449–466. Academic Press.

Thomason, Richmond (1992). NETL and subsequent path-based inheritance theories. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 23:179–204.

Thomason, Richmond (2009). Logic and artificial intelligence. In Zalta, Edward, editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 Edition). Stanford University. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/logic-ai/.

Thomson, Judith Jarvis (1990). The Realm of Rights. Harvard University Press.

Touretzky, David (1984). Implicit ordering of defaults in inheritance systems. In Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-84), pages 322–325. Morgan Kaufmann.

Touretzky, David (1986). The Mathematics of Inheritance Systems. Morgan Kaufmann.

Touretzky, David, Horty, John, and Thomason, Richmond (1987). A clash of intuitions: the current state of nonmonotonic multiple inheritance systems. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-87), pages 476–482. Morgan Kaufmann.

Touretzky, David, Thomason, Richmond, and Horty, John (1991). A skeptic’s menagerie: conflictors, preemptors, reinstaters, and zombies in nonmonotonic inheritance. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-91), pages 478–483. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

van Fraassen, Bas (1972). The logic of conditional obligation. The Journal of Philosophical Logic, 72:417–438.

van Fraassen, Bas (1973). Values and the heart’s command. The Journal of Philosophy, 70:5–19.

Väyrynen, Pekka (2004). Particularism and default reasons. Ethical Theory and Maral Practice, 7:53–79.

Väyrynen, Pekka (2011). Moral particularism. In Miller, Christian B., editor, Continuum Companion to Ethics. Continuum Books.

Wedgwood, Ralph (2006). The meaning of ‘ought’. In Shafer-Landau, Russ, editor, Oxford Studies in Metaethics, volume 1, pages 127–160. Oxford University Press.

Williams, Bernard (1965). Ethical consistency. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 39 (supplemental):103–124. A revised version appears in Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers 1956–1972, Cambridge University Press, 1973, pages 166–186. (p.250)