Archival Essentialism and the Archival Divide
This chapter concludes the exploration in Part I of the volume of the changing intersections between historical scholars and archivists—between history and the archives. As archivists embraced the “essential” elements of documentation in response to the challenges of new information technologies, many academic historians were rejecting essentialized notions of where and how authority in history is socially, culturally, and politically located. This short conclusion to part I discusses how and why contemporary archivists now think quite differently than their custodial predecessors about the theoretical parameters of archival practice itself, just as many historians now think quite differently from their “scientific” predecessors about how history is shaped. Archivists and historians have come to train differently, have little understanding or even interest in what the other profession does. The result, as this chapter argues, has been the opening of an “archival divide.”
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.