Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Ideology, Psychology, and Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jon Hanson

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199737512

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737512.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 12 December 2018

Seeing Bias: Discrediting and Dismissing Accurate Attributions

Seeing Bias: Discrediting and Dismissing Accurate Attributions

Chapter:
(p.453) Chapter 13 Seeing Bias: Discrediting and Dismissing Accurate Attributions
Source:
Ideology, Psychology, and Law
Author(s):

Adam Benforado

Jon Hanson

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737512.003.0019

This chapter explores the way in which dispositionism maintains its dominance as an attributional framework despite failing to capture accurately the causes of human behavior. The answer lies in a subordinate dynamic and discourse, naïve cynicism: the basic subconscious mechanism by which dispositionists discredit and dismiss generally more accurate situationist insights and their proponents. Without the operation of naïve cynicism, dispositionism would be far more vulnerable to challenge and change. Naïve cynicism is, thus, critically important to explaining how and why certain legal policies manage to carry the day. As a case study, the chapter considers the naïve cynical backlash against situationist accounts of the causes of prisoner abuses at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay, and other detentions centers.

Keywords:   naïve cynicism, legal policies, prisoner abuse, backlash, dispositionism, situationism, abu ghraib, attributional framework, ideology, naïve realism, introspection illusion, false consensus effect, bias blind spot, false polarization, hostile media effect

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .