Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Psychotherapy Relationships That WorkEvidence-Based Responsiveness$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

John C. Norcross

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199737208

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737208.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 21 January 2019

Preferences

Preferences

Chapter:
(p.301) Chapter 15 Preferences
Source:
Psychotherapy Relationships That Work
Author(s):

Joshua K. Swift

Jennifer L. Callahan

Barbara M. Vollmer

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737208.003.0015

Client preferences are recognized as a key component to evidence-based practice; however, research has yet to confirm the actual influence preferences have on treatment outcome. In this meta-analysis, this chapter summarizes results from thirty-five studies that have examined the preference effect with adult clients. Overall, clients who were matched to their preferred therapy conditions were less likely to drop out of therapy prematurely (OR = .59, p 〈 .001) and showed greater improvements in treatment outcomes (d = .31, p 〈 .001). Type of preference (role, therapist, or treatment type) was not found to moderate the preference effect, but study design was found to be a significant moderator, with RCTs showing the largest differences between preference-matched and nonmatched clients. These results underscore the centrality of incorporating patient preferences when making treatment decisions. Clinical examples and therapeutic practices are provided.

Keywords:   preference, meta-analysis, evidence-based practice, client variables, meta-analysis, therapy relationship

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .