Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Logic in GrammarPolarity, Free Choice, and Intervention$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Gennaro Chierchia

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199697977

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697977.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 16 December 2017

The Spontaneous Logicality of Language

The Spontaneous Logicality of Language

Chapter:
(p.11) 1 The Spontaneous Logicality of Language
Source:
Logic in Grammar
Author(s):

Gennaro Chierchia

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697977.003.0002

Chapter 1 shows how scalar implicatures and Negative Polarity Items (NPIs) are sensitive to whether a context is upward or downward entailing. It reviews the alternative based semantics of focus developed by M. Rooth and motivates the claim that NPIs activate subdomain alternatives on the basis of their behavior in situation of contrastive focus. It argues that the distribution of NPIs follows largely from this assumption (building on work by N. Kadmon and F. Landman, and M. Krifka). The behavior of NPIs under focus provides preliminary support for the view that these items are constrained to activating subdomain alternatives. The proposal rests on the idea that NPI violations (i.e. ‘unlicensed’ NPIs) give raise to analytically false sentences. The Chapter discusses accordingly the relation between logical analyticity and (un)grammaticality, and develops the idea that certain logically trivial sentences come out as ungrammatical, articulating the notion of G(rammatical)-triviality. This proposal is set in the perspective of previous influential approaches to polarity in terms of syntactic, semantic and pragmatic licensing.

Keywords:   focus, subdomain alternatives, analyticity and grammaticality, licensing of NPIs, downward vs. upward monotonicity, affective items

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .