Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The A Priori in Philosophy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Albert Casullo and Joshua C. Thurow

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199695331

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695331.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 17 October 2018

A Priori Testimony Revisited

A Priori Testimony Revisited

Chapter:
(p.158) 7 A Priori Testimony Revisited
Source:
The A Priori in Philosophy
Author(s):

Anna-Sara Malmgren

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695331.003.0008

In previous work, Malmgren critically examined Burge’s case for the thesis that there’s a priori knowledge by testimony. Neta has recently defended Burge against one of Malmgren’s key objections. In this chapter, she responds to Neta, further explores another strand of her original criticism, and evaluates the prospects for vindicating Burge’s thesis in a quite different way—with appeal to a ‘fast track’ model of testimony.

Keywords:   a priori, testimony, introspection, warrant-preservation, entitlement

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .