South Africa's track-record of receiving international law into the domestic legal order since the introduction of the new constitutional order in 1994 is mixed. On one hand, the Constitution of 1996 is very receptive to international law, notably as a guideline for interpretation. Courts are also keen to use international human rights instruments as a guideline for interpreting the Constitution, even though their methodology in this regard is open to criticism. On the other hand, the courts are much more reluctant to resort to international law as an instrument of interpretation in areas outside human rights law. Parliament's track-record in implementing non-self-executing and non-technical treaties is inconsistent.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.