Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Phonological ArchitectureA Biolinguistic Approach$

Bridget D. Samuels

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199694358

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694358.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 19 February 2017

(p.211) References

(p.211) References

Source:
Phonological Architecture
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Bibliography references:

Abels, Klaus (2003). ‘Successive Cyclicity, Anti‐locality, and Adposition Stranding’ Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut.

Abney, Steven (1987). ‘The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Addessi, E., Mancini, A., Crescimbene, L., Padoa‐Schioppa, C., and Visalberghi, E. (2008). ‘Preference Transitivity and Symbolic Representation in Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella)’ PLoS ONE, 3(6): e2414.

Akinlabi, Akinbiyi, and Liberman, Mark (2000). ‘The Tonal Phonology of Yoruba Clitics’ In B. Gerlach and J. Grijzenhout (eds.), Clitics in Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 31–62.

Alexiadou, Artemis, and Anagnostopoulou, Elena (1998). ‘Parametrizing AGR: Word Order, V‐movement, and EPP‐checking’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491–539.

Andersen, Henning (1973). ‘Abductive and Deductive Change’ Language 49: 765–93.

—— (2008). ‘Grammaticalization in a Speaker‐Oriented Theory of Change’ In T. Eythórsson (ed.), Grammatical Change and Linguistic Theory: The Rosendal Papers. John Benjamins, Amsterdam: 11–44.

Anderson, John M. (2006). ‘Structural Analogy and Universal Grammar’ Lingua 116: 601–33.

Anderson, Stephen R. (1981). ‘Why Phonology Isn't “Natural”.’ Linguistic Inquiry 12(4): 493–539.

—— (1985). Phonology in the Twentieth Century: Theories of Rules and Theories of Representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

—— (2004). Dr. Dolittle's Delusion: Animals and the Uniqueness of Human Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.

—— (2009). ‘The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory’ Language 84(4): 795–814.

—— and Lightfoot, David W. (2002). The Language Organ: Linguistics as Cognitive Physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Aoun, Youssef (1979). ‘Is the Syllable or the Supersyllable a Constituent?’ MITWPL 1: 140–8.

Arad, Maya (2003). ‘Locality Constraints on the Interpretation of Roots: The Case of Hebrew Denominal Verbs’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 737–78.

Archangeli, Diana, and Pulleyblank, Douglas (1994). Grounded Phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

Aronoff, Mark (1976). Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

—— Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol A., and Sandler, Wendy (2008). ‘The Roots of Linguistic Organization in a New Language’ Interaction Studies, 9(1): 133–53.

(p.212) Avery, Peter, and Idsardi, William J. (2001). ‘Laryngeal Dimensions, Completion, and Enhancement’ In T. A. Hall (ed.), Distinctive Feature Theory. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 41–71.

Baayen, R. Harald, Piepenbrock, Richard, and Gulikers, L. (1993). The CELEX Lexical Database. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.

Bachrach, Asaf, and Katzir, Roni (2007). ‘Right‐Node Raising and Delayed Spellout’ MS, MIT.

—— and Wagner, Michael (2007). ‘Syntactically Driven Cyclicity vs. Output–Output Correspondence: The Case of Adjunction in Diminutive Morphology,’ MS, MIT and Cornell University.

Bagemihl, Bruce (1989). ‘The Crossing Constraint and “Backwards languages”.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7(4): 481–529.

Baker, Mark C. (2008). ‘The Macroparameter in a Microparametric World’ In T. Biberauer (ed.), The Limits of Syntactic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 351–74.

Baković, Eric (2005). ‘Antigemination, Assimilation, and the Determination of Identity. Phonology, 22(3): 279–315.

Battistella, Edwin L. (1996). The Logic of Markedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Belin, Pascal (2006). ‘Voice Processing in Human and Non‐human Primates’ Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 361: 2091–107.

Bender, B. (1968). ‘Marshallese Phonology’ Oceanic Linguistics 7: 16–35.

Bermúdez‐Otero, Ricardo (2010). ‘Morphologically Conditioned Phonetics? Not Proven’ Paper presented at OnLI II, Belfast.

—— (forthcoming). Stratal Optimality Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Best, Catherine, Morrongiello, B., and Robson, R. (1981). ‘Perceptual Equivalence of Acoustic Cues in Speech and Nonspeech Perception’ Perception and Psy‐chophysics 29(3): 191–211.

Biro, Dora, and Matsuzawa, Tetsuro (1999). ‘Numerical Ordering in a Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): Planning, Executing, and Monitoring. Journal of Comparative Psychology 113: 178–85.

Blaho, Sylvia (2008). ‘The Syntax of Phonology: A Radically Substance‐Free Approach’ Ph.D. thesis, Universitetet i Tromsø, Tromsø.

Blevins, Juliette (1995). ‘The Syllable in Phonological Theory’ In J. A. Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 206–44.

—— (2003). ‘The Independent Nature of Phonotactic Constraints: An Alternative to Syllable‐Based Approaches’ In C. Féry and R. van de Vijver (eds.), The Syllable in Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 375–403.

—— (2004). Evolutionary Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—— and Garrett, Andrew (2004). ‘The Evolution of Metathesis’ In B. Hayes, R. Kirchner, and D. Steriade (eds.), Phonetically‐Based Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 117–56.

Bliese, Loren F. (1981). A Generative Grammar of Afar. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.

(p.213) Bloomfield, Leonard (1934 [1970]). Review of W. Haver's Handbuch der erklärenden Syntax. In C. F. Hockett (ed.), A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 280–88.

Bobaljik, Jonathan (2000). ‘The Ins and Outs of Contextual Allomorphy’ University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 35–71.

Boeckx, Cedric (2006). Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—— (2008). ‘Elementary Syntactic Structures: A Minimalist Inquiry’ MS, Harvard Universit y.

—— (2010a). ‘Defeating Lexicocentrism: Outline of Elementary Syntactic Structures, Part a’ MS, ICREA/Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

—— (2010b). ‘Linguistic Minimalism’ In B. Heine and H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 485–506.

—— (2010c). ‘What Principles and Parameters Got Wrong’ MS, ICREA/Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

—— (forthcoming a). ‘Approaching Parameters from Below’ In A. M. Di Sciullo and C. Boeckx (eds.), Biolinguistic Approaches to Language Evolution and Variation Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—— (forthcoming b). ‘Some Reflections on Darwin's Problem in the Context of Cartesian Biolinguistics’ In A. M. Di Sciullo and C. Aguero (eds.), Biolinguistic Investigations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

—— and Grohmann, Kleanthes K. (2007). The Biolinguistics Manifesto. Biolinguis‐ tics 1(1): 1–8.

—— and Piattelli‐Palmarini, Massimo (2005). ‘Language as a Natural Object, Linguistics as a Natural Science’ Linguistic Review 22: 447–66.

Bolhuis, Johan J., Okanoya, Kazuo, and Scharff, Constance (2010). ‘Twitter Evolution: Converging Mechanisms in Birdsong and Human Speech’ Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 11: 747–59.

Borer, Hagit (1984). Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.

—— (2009). ‘Roots and Categories’ Paper presented at the 19th Colloquium on Generative Grammar, Vitoria‐Gasteiz.

Bošković, Željko (2005). ‘On the Locality of Left Branch Extraction and the Structure of NP’ Studia Linguistica 59: 1–45.

—— and Lasnik, Howard (eds.) (2007). Minimalist Syntax: The Essential Readings. Oxford: Blackwell.

Brame, Michael (1972). ‘On the Abstractness of Phonology: Maltese’ain’ In M. Brame (ed.), Contributions to Generative Phonology. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Brannon, E. M., and Terrace, H. S. (1998). ‘Ordering of the Numerosities 1 to 9 by Monkeys’ Science 282: 746–49.

—— ——(2000). ‘Representation of the Numerosities 1–9 by Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta)’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26(1): 31–49.

(p.214) Brannon, E. M., Wusthoff, Courtney J., Gallistel, C.R., and Gibbon, John (2001). ‘Numerical Subtraction in the Pigeon: Evidence for a Linear Subjective Number Scale’ Psychological Science 12: 238–43.

Brentari, Diane (1998). A Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

Bresnan, Joan (1971). ‘Sentence Stress and Syntactic Transformations’ Language 47: 257–81.

Brody, Michael, and Szabolcsi, Anna (2003). ‘Overt Scope in Hungarian’ Syntax 6(1): 19–51.

Bromberger, Sylvain, and Halle, Morris (1989). ‘Why Phonology is Different’ In A. Kasher (ed.), The Chomskyan Turn. Oxford: Blackwell, 56–77.

Brosch, Michael, Selezneva, Elena, Bucks, C., and Scheich, Henning (2004). ‘Macaque Monkeys Discriminate Pitch Relationships’ Cognition 91: 259–72.

——, Selezneva, Elena, and Scheich, Henning (2005). ‘Nonauditory Events of a Behavioral Procedure Activate Auditory Cortex of Highly Trained Monkeys’ Journal of Neuroscience 25(29): 6797–806.

Broselow, Ellen (1983). ‘Salish Double Reduplications: Subjacency in Morphology’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1(3): 317–46.

—— (1984). ‘Default Consonants in Amharic Morphology’ MITWPL 7: 15–31.

Brown, Charles H., and Sinnott, Joan M. (2006). ‘Cross‐species Comparisons of Vocal Perception’ In S. Greenberg and W. A. Ainsworth (eds.), Listening to Speech: An Auditory Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 183–201.

Brown, J. C., and Golston, Chris (2004). ‘The Evolution of Hierarchical Structure in Language’ In Proceedings of BLS 30, 13–22.

Brunelle, Marc (2008). ‘Speaker Control in the Phonetic Implementation of Cham Registers’ Paper presented at the 3rd Conference on Tone and Intonation in Europe, Lisbon.

Budinger, Eike, and Heil, Peter (2006). ‘Anatomy of the Auditory Cortex’ In S. Greenberg and W. A. Ainsworth (eds.), Listening to Speech: An Auditory Perspective. Mah‐wah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 91–113.

Butler, Johnny (2007). ‘The Structure of Temporality and Modality (or, Towards Deriving Something Like a Cinque Hierarchy)’ In P. Pica (ed.), Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2006. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 161–201.

Butterworth, Brian (1999). What Counts: How Every Brain is Hardwired for Math. New York: Free Press.

Byrne, Richard W. (2007). ‘Clues to the Origin of the Human Mind from Primate Observational Field Data’ Japanese Journal of Animal Psychology, 57: 1–14.

Cairns, Charles (2009). ‘Phonological Representations and the Vaux‐Wolfe Proposal’ In E. Raimy and C. Cairns (eds.) Contemporary views on Architecture and Representations in Phonological Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 145–64.

Cairns, P., Shillcock, R., Chater, N., and Levy, J. (1997). ‘Bootstrapping Word Boundaries: A bottom‐up Corpus‐Based Approach to Speech Segmentation’ Cognitive Psychology 33: 111–53.

(p.215) Calabrese, Andrea (1988). ‘Towards a Theory of Phonological Alphabets’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

—— (1995). ‘A Constraint‐Based Theory of Phonological Markedness and Simplification Procedures’ Linguistic Inquiry 26: 373–463.

—— (2005). Markedness and Economy in a Derivational Model of Phonology. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

—— (2009). ‘Markedness Theory versus Phonological Idiosyncrasies in a Realistic Model of Language’ In E. Raimy and C. Cairns (eds.), Contemporary Views on Architecture and Representations in Phonological Theory. 261–304. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

Carr, Philip (2006). ‘Universal Grammar and Syntax/Phonology Parallelisms’ Lingua 166: 634–56.

Carstairs‐McCarthy, Andrew (1999). The Origins of Complex Language: An Inquiry into the Evolutionary Beginnings of Sentences, Syllables, and Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter, and Schilling‐Estes, Natalie (eds.) (2002). The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell.

Cheney, Dorothy L., and Seyfarth, Robert M. (2007). Baboon Metaphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cho, Young‐Mee Yu (1990). ‘Syntax and Phrasing in Korean’ In S. Inkelas and D. Zec (eds.), The Phonology‐Syntax Connection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 47–62.

Choi, J. (1992). ‘Phonetic Underspecification and Target Interpolation: An Acoustic Study of Marshallese Vocalic Allophony’ UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 82.

Chomsky, Noam (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.

—— (1959). ‘A review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal BehaviorLanguage 35(1): 26–58.

—— (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

—— (1967). ‘Some General Properties of Phonological Rules’ Language 43(1): 102–28.

—— (1970). ‘Remarks on Nominalization’ In R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn, 184–221.

—— (1973). ‘Conditions on Transformations’ In S. R. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 232–86.

—— (1991). ‘Some Notes on the Economy of Derivation’ In R. Freidin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 417–54.

—— (1993). ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’ In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. MIT, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 1–49.

—— (1995a). ‘Bare Phrase Structure’ In G. Webelhuth (ed.), Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell, 383–439.

—— (1995b). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

—— (2000). ‘Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework’ In R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 89–155.

(p.216) Chomsky, Noam (2001). ‘Derivation by Phase’ In M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 1–52.

—— (2002). On Nature and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—— (2004). ‘Beyond Explanatory Adequacy’ In A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 104–31.

—— (2005). ‘Three Factors in Language Design’ Linguistic Inquiry 35(1), 1–22.

—— (2007). ‘Approaching UG from Below’ In U. Sauerland and H. M. Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–29.

—— (2008). ‘On Phases’ In C. Otero, R. Freidin, and M.‐L. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean‐Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 133–66.

—— (2009). ‘Opening Remarks’ In M. Piattelli‐Palmarini, J. Uriagereka, and P. Sal‐ aburu (eds.), Of Minds and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13–43.

—— (2010). ‘Some Simple Evo Devo Theses: How True Might They Be for Language?’In R. K. Larson, V. Déprez, and H. Yamakido (ed.), The Evolution of Human Language: Biolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 45–62.

—— and Halle, Morris (1968). ‘The Sound Pattern of English’ New York: Harper and Row.

—— ——, and Lukoff, Fred (1956). ‘On Accent and Juncture in English’ In For Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday. The Hague: Mouton, 65–80.

Christdas, Pratima (1988). ‘The Phonology and Morphology of Tamil’ Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

Cinque, Guglielmo (1993). ‘A Null Theory of Phrase and Compound Stress’ Linguistic Inquiry 24: 239–97.

Citko, Barbara (2005). ‘On the Nature of Merge: External Merge, Internal Merge, and Parallel Merge’ Linguistic Inquiry 36: 475–496.

Clements, George N. (1978). ‘Tone and Syntax in Ewe’ In D. J. Napoli (ed.), Elements of Tone, Stress, and Intonation. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. 21–99.

—— (1985). ‘The Geometry of Phonological Features’ Phonology Yearbook 2: 225–52.

—— (1987). ‘Phonological Feature Representation and the Description of Intrusive Stops’ In Proceedings of CLS 23 2: 29–50.

—— (2003). ‘Feature Economy in Sound Systems’ Phonology 20: 287–333.

—— (2009). ‘Does Sonority Have a Phonetic Basis?’In E. Raimy and C. Cairns (eds.), Contemporary Views on Architecture and Representations in Phonological Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 165–76.

—— and Hume, Elizabeth (1995). ‘The Internal Organization of Speech Sounds’ In J. A. Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 245–306.

Coen, Michael Harlan (2006). ‘Multimodal Dynamics: Self‐supervised Learning in Perceptual and Motor Systems’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

(p.217) Coetzee, Andries W., and Pater, Joe (forthcoming). ‘The Place of Variation in Phonological Theory’ In J. A. Goldsmith, J. Riggle, and A. C. Yu (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. (2nd ed.) Oxford: Blackwell.

Cohn, Abigail C. (1990). ‘Phonetic and Phonological Rules of Nasalization’ UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 76.

Cole, Jennifer (1995). ‘The Cycle in Phonology’ In J. A. Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 70–113.

Compton, Richard, and Pittman, Christine (2007). ‘Word‐formation by Phase in Inuit’ MS, University of Toronto.

Conway, Christopher M., and Christiansen, Morten H. (2001). ‘Sequential Learning in Non‐human Primates’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5(12): 539–46.

Corina, David P., and Sagey, Elizabeth (1989). ‘Are Phonological Hierarchies Universal? Evidence from American Sign Language’ In K. de Jong and Y. No (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 73–83.

Coseriu, Eugenio (1958). Sincronía, diacronía e historia: el problema del cambio lingüístico. Montevideo: Universidad de la Republica.

Côté, Marie‐Hélène (2000). ‘Consonant Cluster Phonotactics: A Perceptual Approach’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Crain, Stephen, and Nakayama, Mineharu (1987). ‘Structure Dependence in Children's Language’ Language 62: 522–543.

Davis, Henry, Matthewson, Lisa, and Rullmann, Hotze (2009). ‘ “Out of Control” Marking as Circumstantial Modality in St'at'imcets’ In L. Hogeweg, H. de Hoop, and A. Malchukov (eds.), Cross‐linguistic Semantics of Tense, Aspect, and Modality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 205–44.

de Boer, Bart (2001). The Origins of Vowel Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dediu, Dan, and Ladd, Robert D. (2007). ‘Linguistic Tone is Related to the Population Frequency of the Adaptive Haplogroups of Two Brain Size Genes, ASPM and Microcephalin’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 10944–9.

Dehaene, Stanislas (1997). The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dehaene‐Lambertz, Ghislaine, Dupoux, E., and Gout, A. (2000). ‘Electrophysiological Correlates of Phonological Processing: A Cross‐linguistic Study’ Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12(4): 635–47.

de Lacy, Paul (2006). Markedness: Reduction and Preservation in Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dell, François, and Elmedlaoui, Mohammed (2002). Syllables in Tashlhiyt Berber and in Moroccan Arabic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Demuth, Katherine, and Mmusi, Sheila (1997). ‘Presentational Focus and Thematic Structure’ Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 18: 1–19.

de Saussure, Ferdinand (1916). Cours de Linguistique Générale. Paris: Payot.

Devlin, Keith (2005). The Math Instinct. New York: Thunder's Mouth.

Di Sciullo, Anna Maria (2004). ‘Morphological Phases’ In Generative Grammar in a Broader Perspective: The 4th GLOW in Asia, 113–37.

(p.218) Di Sciullo, Anna Maria (2005). Asymmetry in Morphology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

Dijkstra, Edsger W. (1959). ‘A Note on Two problems in Connexion with Graphs’ Numerische Mathematik 1: 269–71.

Dobashi, Yoshihito (2003). ‘Phonological Phrasing and Syntactic Derivation’ Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

Doupe, Allison J., and Kuhl, Patricia K. (1999). ‘Birdsong and Human Speech: Common Themes and Mechanisms’ Annual Review of Neuroscience 22: 567–631.

Dresher, Elan B. (2003). ‘The Contrastive Hierarchy in Phonology’ Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 20: 47–62.

—— (2009). The Contrastive Hierarchy in Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Duanmu, San (2008). Syllable Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dubinsky, Stanley, and Simango, Sylvester Ron (1996). ‘Passive and Stative in Chichewa: Evidence for Modular Distinctions in Grammar’ Language 72: 749–81.

Dupoux, E., Kakehi, K., Hirose, Y., Pallier, C., and Mehler, J. (1999). ‘Epenthetic Vowels in Japanese: A Perceptual Illusion?’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception Performance 25: 1568–78.

Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. D., Jusczyk, Peter W., and Vigorito, J. (1971). ‘Speech Perception in Infants’ Science, 171: 303–6.

Elbert, T., Pantev, C., Wienbruch, C., Rockstroh, B., and Taub, E. (1995). ‘Increased Cortical Representation of the Fingers of the Left Hand in String Players’ Science 270: 305–7.

Embick, David (2010). Localism vs. Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

—— and Noyer, Rolf (2001). ‘Movement Operations After Syntax’ Linguistic Inquiry 32(4): 555–96.

Endress, Ansgar D., Carden, Sarah, Versace, Elisabetta, and Hauser, Marc D. (2009). ‘The Apes'Edge: Positional Learning in Chimpanzees and Humans’ Animal Cognition 13(3): 483–95.

Epstein, Samuel David, Groat, Erich M., Kawashima, Ruriko, and Kitahara, Hisatsugu (1998). A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Everett, Daniel L., and Everett, Karen (1984). ‘On the Relevance of Syllable Onsets to Stress Placement’ Linguistic Inquiry 15, 705–11.

Faarlund, Jan Terje (2008). ‘A Mentalist Interpretation of Grammaticalization Theory’ In T. Eythórsson (ed.), Grammatical Change and Linguistic Theory: The Rosendal Papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 221–44.

Fehér, Olga, Wang, Haibin, Saar, Sigal, Mitra, Partha P., and Tchernichovski, Ofer (2009). ‘De novo Establishment of Wild‐Type Song Culture in the Zebra Finch’ Nature 459(7246): 564–8.

Feigenson, Lisa, and Halberda, Justin (2004). ‘Infants Chunk Object Arrays into Sets of Individuals’ Cognition 91: 173–90.

Fitch, W. Tecumseh (2005). ‘Dancing to Darwin's Tune’ Nature 438: 288.

—— (2010). The Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

(p.219) ——, Hauser, Marc D., and Chomsky, Noam (2005). ‘The Evolution of the Language Faculty: Clarifications and Implications’ Cognition 97(2): 179–210.

—— Huber, Ludwig, and Bugnyar, Thomas (2010). ‘Social Cognition and the Evolution of Language: Constructing Cognitive Phylogenies’ Neuron 65: 795–814.

Fitzpatrick, Justin M. (2006). ‘Sources of Multiple Reduplication in Salish and Beyond’ MIT Working Papers on Endangered and Less Familiar Languages 7: Studies in Salishan, 211–40.

Flack, Kathryn (2009). ‘Constraints on Onsets and Codas of Words and Phrases’ Phonology 26: 269–302.

Fortuny, Jordi (2008). The Emergence of Order in Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

—— and Gallego, Ángel J. (2009). ‘Introduction: The Minimalist Program and the Concept of Universal Grammar’ Catalan Journal of Linguistics 8: 7–15.

Frampton, John (2009). Distributed Reduplication. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

Frascarelli, Mara (2007). ‘Subjects, Topics, and the Interpretation of Referential proNatural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(4): 691–734.

Freedman, D. J., Riesenhuber, M., Poggio, T., and Miller, E. K. (2001). ‘Categorical Perception of Visual Stimuli in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex’ Science 291: 312–16.

Freidin, Robert (1999). ‘Cyclicity and Minimalism’ In S. D. Epstein and N. Hornstein (eds.), Working Minimalism. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 95–126.

Frey, Scott H., Bogdanov, Sergei, Smith, Jolinda C., Watrous, Scott, and Breidenbach, Warren C. (2008). ‘Chronically Deafferented Sensory Cortex Recovers a Grossly Typical Organization after Allogenic Hand Transplantation’ Current Biology 18: 1–5.

Fudge, E. C. (1969). ‘Syllables’ Journal of Linguistics 5: 253–86.

Fujita, Koji (2007). ‘Facing the Logical Problem of Language Evolution’ Review of Jenkins (2004), Variation and Universals in Biolinguistics. English Linguistics 24(1): 78–108.

—— (2009). ‘A Prospect for Evolutionary Adequacy: Merge and the Evolution and Development of Human Language’ Biolinguistics 3(2–3): 138–53.

Fukui, Naoki (1995). ‘The Principles and Parameters Approach: A Comparative Syntax of English and Japanese’ In M. Shibatani and T. Bynon (eds.), Approaches to Language Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 327–72.

—— and Takano, Yuji (1998). ‘Symmetry in Syntax: Merge and Demerge’ Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7: 27–86.

Gagnon, Michaël (2008). ‘On Linearizing Subtractive Morphology’ MS, Concordia Universit y.

—— and Piché, Maxime (2007). ‘Principles of Linearization and Subtractive Morphology’ Paper presented at the CUNY Phonology Forum Conference on Precedence Relations, CUNY, 25–26 January.

Gallego, Ángel J. (2008). ‘Phases and Variation: Exploring the Second Factor of the Faculty of Language’ MS, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

Gallistel, C. R., and Gelman, Rochel (2005). ‘Mathematical Cognition’ In K. Holyoak and R. Morrison (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 559–88.

(p.220) Gambell, Timothy, and Yang, Charles (2005). ‘Word Segmentation: Quick but Not Dirty’ MS, Yale University.

Garrett, Andrew, and Blevins, Juliette (2009). ‘Morphophonological Analogy’ In S. Inkelas and K. Hanson (eds.), The Nature of the Word: Studies in Honor of Paul Kiparsky. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 527–45.

Gehring, W. J. (1998). Master Control Genes in Development and Evolution: The Home‐ obox Story. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Gelman, R., and Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The Child's Understanding of Number. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Gentner, Timothy Q., Fenn, Kimberly M., Margoliash, Daniel, and Nusbaum, Howard C. (2006). ‘Recursive Syntactic Pattern Learning by Songbirds’ Nature 440: 1204–7.

—— (2010). ‘Simple Stimuli, Simple Strategies’ PNAS 107: E65.

Ghazanfar, Asif A., Chandrasekaran, Chandramouli, and Logothetis, Nikos K. (2008). ‘Interactions Between the Superior Temporal Sulcus and Auditory Cortex Mediate Dynamic Face/Voice Integration in Rhesus Monkeys’ Journal of Neuroscience 28(17): 4457–69.

—— Maier, J. X., Hoffman, K. L., and Logothetis, Nikos K. (2005). ‘Multisensory Integration of Dynamic Faces and Voices in Rhesus Monkey Auditory Cortex’, Journal of Neuroscience 67: 580–94.

Ghini, Micro (1993). ‘Phi Formation in Italian: A New Proposal’ Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 12(2): 41–78.

Giegerich, Heinz (1992). English Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gil da Costa, Ricardo, Braun, Allen, Lopes, Marco, Hauser, Marc D., Carson, Richard E., Herscovitch, Peter, and Martin, Alex (2004). ‘Toward an Evolutionary Perspective on Conceptual Representation: Species‐Specific Calls Activate Visual and Affective Processing Systems in the Macaque’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(50): 17516–21.

Gnanadesikan, Amalia (2008). ‘Syllables and Syllabaries: What Writing Systems Tell Us about Syllable Structure’ Paper presented at the CUNY Phonology Forum Conference on the Syllable.

Goldsmith, John A. (1976). ‘Autosegmental Phonology’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

—— (forthcoming). ‘The syllable’ In J. A. Goldsmith, J. Riggle, and A. C. Yu (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.

—— and Larson, Gary (1990). ‘Local Modeling and Syllabification’ In Proceedings of CLS 26 Parasession on the Syllable, 129–41.

Golston, Chris (2007). ‘Variables in Optimality Theory’ In S. Blaho, P. Bye, and M. Krämer (eds.), Freedom of Analysis? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 345–72.

Gould, Stephen Jay (1976). ‘In Defense of the Analog: A Commentary to N. Hotton’ In R. Masterson, W. Hodos, and H. Jerison (eds.), Evolution, Brain, and Behavior: Persistent Problems. New York: Wiley, 175–9.

Goyvaerts, Didier L. (1978). Aspects of Post‐SPE Phonology. Ghent: E. Story‐Scientia.

(p.221) Greenberg, Joseph H. (1957). ‘The Nature and Uses of Linguistic Typologies’ International Journal of American Linguistics 23: 68–77.

—— (1978). ‘Typology and Cross‐linguistic Generalization’ In J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, and E. A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language: Method and Theory, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 33–59.

Greenfield, Patricia M. (1991). ‘Language, Tools, and Brain: The Ontogeny and Phy‐ logeny of Hierarchically Organized Sequential Behavior’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14: 531–95.

—— (1998). ‘Language, Tools, and Brain Revisited’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21: 159–63.

—— Nelson, Karen, and Saltzmann, Elliot (1972). ‘The Development of Rulebound Strategies for Manipulating Seriated Nesting Cups: A Parallel between Action and Grammar’ Cognitive Psychology 3: 291–310.

Guenther, Frank H., and Gjaja, Marin N. (1996). ‘The Perceptual Magnet Effect as an Emergent Property of Neural Map Formation’ Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100: 1111–21.

Gussmann, Edmund (1988). ‘Review of Mohanan (1986), The Theory of Lexical PhonologyJournal of Linguistics 24: 232–9.

—— (2002). Phonology: Analysis and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hale, Mark (2000). ‘Marshallese Phonology, the Phonetics–Phonology Interface, and Historical Linguistics’ The Linguistic Review 17: 241–57.

—— (2007). Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.

——and Kissock, Madelyn (1998). ‘Nonphonological Triggers for Renewed Access to Phonetic Perception’ In Proceedings of GALA 1997, 229–34.

——and Reiss, Charles (2000a). ‘Phonology as Cognition’ In N. Burton‐Roberts, P. Carr, and G. Docherty (eds.), Phonological Knowledge: Conceptual and Empirical Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 161–84.

—— ——(2000b). ‘Substance Abuse and Dysfunctionalism: Current Trends in Phonology’ Linguistic Inquiry 31(1): 157–69.

—— ——(2008). The Phonological Enterprise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—— Kissock, Madelyn, and Reiss, Charles (2007). ‘Microvariation, Variation, and the Features of Universal Grammar’ Lingua 117(4): 645–65.

Hall, Daniel Currie (2007). ‘The Role and Representation of Contrast in Phonological Theory’ Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto.

Halle, Morris (1959). The Sound Pattern of Russian. The Hague: Mouton.

—— (1992). ‘Phonological Features’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 91–105.

—— (2002). From Memory to Speech and Back. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

—— (2002 [1978]). ‘Knowledge Unlearned and Untaught: What Speakers Know about the Sounds of their Language’ In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, and G. A. Miller (eds.), Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 294–303. Repr. in Halle (2002).

—— (2005). ‘Palatalization/Velar Softening: What It Is and What It Tells Us about the Nature of Language’ Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 23–41.

(p.222) Halle, Morris (2008). ‘Reduplication’ In R. Freidin, C. Otero, and M.‐L. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean‐Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 325–358.

—— and Marantz, Alec (1993). ‘Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection’ In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 111–76.

—— and Vergnaud, Jean‐Roger (1987). An Essay on Stress. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

Han, Chung‐Hye, Lidz, Jeffrey, and Musolino, Julien (2007). ‘V‐raising and Grammar Competition in Korean: Evidence from Negation and Quantifier Scope’ Linguistic Inquiry 38(1): 1–47.

Hanks, Patrick (ed.) (1979). Collins Dictionary of the English Language. London: Collins.

Harley, Heidi (2009a). ‘Roots and Locality’ Paper presented at Universität Stuttgart.

—— (2009b). ‘Roots: Identity, Insertion, Idiosyncracies’ Paper presented at the Root Bound workshop, University of Southern California.

Harris, John (1994). English Sound Structure. Oxford: Blackwell.

—— (2004). ‘Release of the Captive Coda: The Foot as a Domain of Phonetic Interpretation’ In J. Local, R. Ogden, and R. Temple (eds.), Phonetic Interpretation: Papers in Laboratory Phonology 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 103–29.

Haspelmath, Martin (1999). ‘Optimality and Diachronic Adaptation’ Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18(2): 180–205.

—— (2006). ‘Against Markedness (and What to Replace It With)’ Journal of Linguistics 42: 25–70.

Haugen, Einar (1956). ‘The Syllable in Linguistic Description’ In M. Halle (ed.), For Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday. The Hague: Mouton, 213–21.

Hauser, Marc D. (1996). The Evolution of Communication. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

—— and Glynn, David D. (2009). ‘Can Free‐Ranging Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) Extract Artificially Created Rules Comprised of Natural Vocalizations?’ Journal of Comparative Psychology 123: 161–7.

—— Carey, Susan, and Hauser, Lillian B. (2000). ‘Spontaneous Number Representation in Semi‐Free‐Ranging Rhesus Monkeys’ In Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences 267: 829–33.

—— Chomsky, Noam, and Fitch, W. Tecumseh (2002). ‘The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?’Science 298: 1569–79.

Hay, Jessica (2005). ‘How Auditory Discontinuities and Linguistic Experience Affect the Perception of Speech and Non‐speech in English‐ and Spanish‐Speaking Listeners’ Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas, Austin.

Hayes, Bruce (1989). ‘Compensatory Lengthening in Moraic Phonology’ Linguistic Inquiry 20: 253–306.

—— Kirchner, Robert, and Steriade, Donca (eds.) (2004). Phonetically‐Based Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

(p.223) —— and Steriade, Donca (2004). ‘Introduction: The Phonetic Bases of Phonological Markedness. In B. Hayes, R. Kirchner, and D. Steriade (eds.), Phonetically Based Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–33.

Heinz, Jeffrey N. (2007). ‘Inductive Learning of Phonotactic Patterns’ Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.

Hooper, Joan Bybee (1972). ‘The Syllable in Phonological Theory’ Language 48(3): 525–40.

Hornstein, Norbert (2001). Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal. Oxford: Blackwell.

—— (2005). ‘What Do Labels Do? Some Thoughts on the Endocentric Roots of Recursion and Movement’ MS, University of Maryland.

—— (2009). A Theory of Syntax: Minimal Operations and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—— and Boeckx, Cedric (2009). ‘Approaching Universals from Below: I‐universals in Light of a Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’ In M. H. Christiansen, C. Collins, and S. Edelman (eds.), Language Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 79–98.

—— Nunes, Jairo, and Grohmann, Kleanthes K. (2005). Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Howard, Irwin (1972). ‘A Directional Theory of Rule Application in Phonology’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Hume, Elizabeth (2004). ‘Deconstructing Markedness: A Predictability‐Based Approach’ In Proceedings of BLS 30, 182–98.

Hyman, Larry (1975). Phonology: Theory and Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

—— (1985). A Theory of Phonological Weight. Dordrecht: Foris.

—— (1990). ‘Boundary Tonology and the Prosodic Hierarchy’ In S. Inkelas and D. Zec (eds.), The Phonology–Syntax Connection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 109–26.

—— (2008). ‘Universals in Phonology’ Linguistic Review 25(1–2): 83–137.

—— and Valinande, Nzamba (1985). ‘Globality in the Kinande Tone System’ In D. L. Goyvaerts (ed.), African Linguistics: Essays in Memory of M.W.K. Semikenke. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 239–60.

Idsardi, William J. (2005). ‘Poverty of the Stimulus Arguments in Phonology’ MS, University of Delaware.

—— and Raimy, Eric (forthcoming). ‘Three Types of Linearization and the Temporal Aspects of Speech’ In T. Biberauer and I. Roberts (eds.), Principles of Linearization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

—— and Shorey, Rachel (2007). ‘Unwinding Morphology’ Paper presented at the CUNY Phonology Forum Workshop on Precedence Relations, CUNY, 25–6 January.

Inkelas, Sharon (1990). Prosodic Constituency in the Lexicon. New York: Garland.

—— (1995). ‘The Consequences of Optimization for Underspecification’ In Proceedings of NELS 25, 287–302.

—— and Zec, Draga (1995). ‘Syntax–Phonology Interface’ In J. A. Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 535–49.

(p.224) Ishihara, Shinichiro (2007). ‘Major Phrase, Focus Intonation, Multiple Spell‐out (MaP, FI, MSO)’ The Linguistic Review 24: 137–67.

Itô, Junko, and Mester, Armin (2003). ‘Lexical and Postlexical Phonology in Optimality Theory: Evidence from Japanese’ In C. Féry and R. van de Vijver (eds.), The Syllable in Optimality Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 271–303.

—— —— (2007). ‘The Onset of the Prosodic Word’ In S. Parker (ed.), Phonological Argumentation: Essays on Evidence and Motivation. London: Equinox.

Jackendoff, Ray, and Pinker, Steven (2005). ‘The Nature of the Language Faculty and Its Implications for Evolution of Language (reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky)’ Cognition 97(2): 211–25.

Jakobson, Roman (1927 [1962]a). ‘The Concept of the Sound Law and the Teleological Criterion’ In Selected Writings I: Phonological Studies. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–3.

—— (1931 [1962]b). ‘Principes de phonologie historique’ In Selected Writings I: Phonological Studies. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, 202–20.

—— Fant, C. Gunnar M., and Halle, Morris (1952). Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and Their Correlates. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

Jensen, J. T. (1977). Yapese Reference Grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press,

Jerne, Niels K. (1985). ‘The Generative Grammar of the Immune System’ Science 229: 1057–9.

Jespersen, Otto (1904). Lehrbuch der Phonetik. Leipzig: Teubner.

Johnson, Douglas C. (1970). ‘Formal Aspects of Phonological Representation’ Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.

Johnson‐Pynn, Julie, Fragaszy, Dorothy M., Hirsh, Elizabeth M., Brakke, Karen E., and Greenfield, Patricia M. (1999). ‘Strategies Used to Combine Seriated Cups by Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), Bonobos (Pan paniscus), and Capuchins (Cebus apella)’ Journal of Comparative Psychology 113(2): 137–48.

Jones, Daniel (1950). The Pronunciation of English. 3rd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jun, Sun‐Ah (1993). ‘The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody’ Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus.

Jusczyk, Peter W., Houston, D. W., and Newsome, M. (1999). ‘The Beginnings of Word Segmentation in English‐Learning Infants’ Cognitive Psychology 39: 159–207.

Kahn, Daniel (1976). ‘Syllable‐Based Generalizations in English Phonology’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan (2004). ‘The Syntax of Sentential Stress’ Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto.

—— (2009). The Syntax of Sentential Stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kaisse, Ellen (1985). Connected Speech: The Interaction of Syntax and Phonology. Orlando: Academic Press.

—— and Hargus, Sharon (eds.) (1993). Lexical Phonology and Morphology. San Diego: Academic Press.

(p.225) Kamali, Beste, and Samuels, Bridget (2008a). ‘All Non‐final Stress Suffixes in Turkish Are Not Created Equal’ Paper presented at the 2nd Mediterranean Syntax Meeting, Istanbul.

—— —— (2008b). ‘The Syntax of Turkish Pre‐stressing Suffixes’ Paper presented at the 3rd Conference on Tone and Intonation in Europe, Lisbon.

Kaplan, Ronald (1987 [1995]). ‘Three Seductions of Computational Psycholinguistics’ In M. Dalrymple, R. Kaplan, J. Maxwell, and A. Zaenen (eds.), Formal Issues in Lexical‐Functional Grammar, Calif. Stanford: CSLI.

Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W., and Volkmann, J. (1949). ‘The Discrimination of Visual Number’ American Journal of Psychology 62: 498–525.

Kaye, Jonathan (1989). Phonology: A Cognitive View. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kayne, Richard S. (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

—— (2008). ‘Antisymmetry and the Lexicon’ In J. van Craenenbroeck and J. Rooryck (eds.), Linguistic Variation Yearbook. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, viii. 1–31.

Kean, Mary‐Louise (1974). ‘The Strict Cycle in Phonology’ Linguistic Inquiry, 5: 179–203.

—— (1975). ‘The Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Keating, Patricia (1988). ‘Underspecification in Phonetics’ Phonology 5: 275–92.

Kenstowicz, Michael (1994). Phonology in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.

Kenyon, John Samuel, and Knott, Thomas Albert (1944). A Pronouncing Dictionary of American English. Springfield, Mass.: Merriam.

Kessler, Brett, and Treiman, Rebecca (1997). ‘Syllable Structure and the Distribution of Phonemes in English Syllables’ Journal of Memory and Language 37: 295–311.

Kim, Yuni (2002). ‘Phonological Features: Privative or Equipollent?’A.B. thesis, Harvard University.

Kiparsky, Paul (1968). How Abstract is Phonology? Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

—— (1982). ‘Lexical Phonology and Morphology’ In I. Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin, 3–91.

—— (1985). ‘Some Consequences of Lexical Phonology’ Phonology Yearbook 2: 85–138.

—— (2000). ‘Opacity and Cyclicity’ The Linguistic Review 17, 351–65.

Kisseberth, Charles (1970). ‘On the Functional Unity of Phonological Rules’ Linguistic Inquiry 1(3): 291–306.

Kitahara, Hisatsugu (2003). ‘Acoustic Perception in Human Newborns and Cotton‐top Tamarins—Recent Findings and their Implications’ Reports of the Keio Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies 35: 31–41.

Kluender, Keith R., Lotto, Andrew J., and Holt, Lori L. (2006). ‘Contributions of Nonhuman Animal Models to Understanding Human Speech Perception’ In S. Greenberg and W. A. Ainsworth (eds.), Listening to Speech: An Auditory Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 203–20.

—— —— —— and Bloedel, S. L. (1998). ‘Role of Experience for Language‐Specific Functional Mappings of Vowel Sounds’ Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104: 3568–82.

(p.226) Kratzer, Angelika (1996). ‘Severing the External Argument from its Verb’ In J. Rooryck and L. Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the Lexicon. Dordrecht, Kluwer: 109–37.

Kreidler, Charles W. (2004). The Pronunciation of English: A Course Book. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.

Kuhl, Patricia K. (1993). ‘Innate Predispositions and the Effects of Experience in Speech Perception: The Native Language Magnet Theory’ In B. de Boysoon‐Bardies, S. de Schonen, P. W. Jusczyk, P. MacNeilage, and J. Morton (eds.), Developmental Neurocognition: Speech and Face Processing in the First Year of Life. Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer Academic, 259–74.

—— (2000). ‘Language, Mind, and the Brain: Experience Alterts Perception’ In M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The New Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 99–115.

—— and Miller, James D. (1975). ‘Speech Perception by the Chinchilla’ Science 190: 69–72.

Kuryłow icz, Jerzy (1948). ‘Contribution à la théorie de la syllabe’ Bulletin de la Société Polonaise de Linquistique 8: 80–114.

Ladefoged, Peter (1967). Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics. London: Oxford University Press.

—— (2001). Vowels and Consonants: An Introduction to the Sounds of Languages. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.

Lakatos, Imre (1970). ‘Falsifications and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs’ In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91–195.

Lakoff, Goerge, and Nuñez, Rafael (2001). Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.

Larson, Gary (1993). ‘Dynamic Computational Models and the Representation of Phonological Information’ Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago.

Lasnik, Howard (2006). ‘Conceptions of the Cycle’ In L. Cheng and N. Corver (eds.), Wh‐movement: Moving On. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 197–216.

—— and Lohndal, Terje (2010). ‘Government‐Binding/Principles and Parameters Theory’ Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1: 40–50.

—— and Uriagereka, Juan (2002). ‘On the Poverty of the Challenge’ Linguistic Review 19: 147–50.

—— —— and Boeckx, Cedric (2005). A Course in Minimalist Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lass, Roger (1976). ‘Rules, Metarules, and the Shape of the Great Vowel Shift’ In R. Lass (ed.), English Phonology and Phonological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 51–102.

—— (1980). On Explaining Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leben, William (1973). ‘Suprasegmental Phonology’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Legate, Julie Anne (2003). ‘Some Interface Properties of the Phase’ Linguistic Inquiry 34(3): 506–16.

(p.227) —— and Yang, Charles D. (2002). ‘Empirical Re‐assessment of Stimulus Poverty Arguments’ Linguistic Review 19: 151–62.

Lenneberg, Eric H. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley.

Lepsius, Richard, and Whitney, William Dwight (1865). ‘On the Relation of Vowels and Consonants’ Journal of the American Oriental Society 8: 357–73.

Levin, Juliette (1985). ‘A Metrical Theory of Syllabicity’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Lewontin, Richard C. (2000). The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and Environment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Liberman, Alvin (1982). ‘On Finding that Speech is Special’ American Psychologist 37(2): 148–67.

Lightfoot, David W. (1979). Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—— (1999). The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.

—— (2006). How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lindau, Mona and Ladefoged, Peter (1986). ‘Variability of Feature Specifications’ In J. Perkell and D. Klatt (eds.), Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 464–78.

Lohndal, Terje (2009a). ‘The Copula Cycle’ In E. van Gelderen (ed.), Cyclical Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 209–42.

—— (2009b). ‘Double Definiteness, Adjectives, and Parameters’ Paper presented at Universität Stuttgart.

—— and Samuels, Bridget (2010). ‘The Edges of the Syntax–Phonology Interface’ MS, University of Maryland.

Lombardi, Linda (2002). ‘Coronal Epenthesis and Markedness’ Phonology 19, 219–51.

Longobardi, Giuseppe (1994). ‘References and Proper Names: A Theory of N‐movement in Syntax and Logical Form’ Linguistic Inquiry 25(4): 609–55.

Lowenstamm, Jean (1981). ‘On the Maximal Cluster Approach to Syllable Structure’ Linguistic Inquiry 12(4): 575–604.

Maddieson, Ian (1984). Patterns of Sound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mailhot, Frédéric, and Reiss, Charles (2007). ‘Computing Long‐Distance Dependencies in Vowel Harmony’ Biolinguistics 1: 28–48.

Marantz, Alec (1982). ‘Re Reduplication’ Linguistic Inquiry 13: 435–82.

—— (1997). ‘No Escape from Syntax: Don't Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon’ In A. Dimitriadis, L. Siegel, C. Surek‐Clark, and A. Williams (eds.), Proceedings of PLC 21, 201–25.

—— (2001). ‘Words’ MS, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

—— (2008). ‘Phases and Words’ In S.‐H. Choe (ed.), Phases in the Theory of Grammar. Seoul: Dong In, 191–222.

—— (2010). ‘Locality Domains for Contextual Allosemy in Words’ Paper presented in the MIT Linguistics Colloquium.

(p.228) Marcus, Gary, Vijayan, S., Bandi Rao, S., and Vishton, P. M. (1999). ‘Rule Learning by Seven‐Month‐Old Infants’ Science 283: 77–80.

Markman, E.M. (1990). ‘Constraints Children Place on Word Meanings’ Cognitive Science 14: 57–77.

Martin, Roger, and Uriagereka, Juan (2000). ‘Some Possible Foundations of the Minimalist Program’ In R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 1–29.

Marvin, Tatjana (2002). ‘Topics in the Stress and Syntax of Words’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Mascaró, Joan (1976). ‘Catalan Phonology and the Phonological Cycle’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Maye, Jessica (2002). ‘The Development of Developmental Speech Production Research: The Impact of Werker and Tees (1984)’ Infant Behavior and Development 25: 140–43.

McCarthy, John J. (1979). ‘Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

—— (1986). ‘OCP Effects: Gemination and Antigemination’ Linguistic Inquiry 17: 207–63.

—— (2002). A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—— and Prince, Alan (1996 [1986]). Prosodic Morphology. Technical Report 32, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.

McGinnis, Martha (2001). ‘Variation in the Phase Structure of Applicatives’ In Linguistic Variation Yearbook. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, i. 105–46.

McGurk, H. and MacDonald, J. (1976). ‘Hearing Lips and Seeing Voices’ Nature 264: 746–48.

McMahon, April (2000). Lexical Phonology and the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Merker, Björn (2000). ‘Synchronous Chorussing and Human Origins’ In N. Wallin, B. Merker, and S. Brown (eds.), The Origin of Music. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 315–28.

Merriam‐Webster (2004). Merriam‐Webster Online Dictionary. 〈http://www.m-w. com/home.htm.〉

Mesgarani, Nima, David, Stephen V., Fritz, Jonathan B., and Shamma, Shihab A. (2008). ‘Phoneme Representation and Classification in Primary Auditory Cortex’ Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123(2): 899–909.

Michaels, Jennifer (2007). ‘Syntactically Conditioned Phonology—Causatives in Malayalam’ MS, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Mielke, Jeff (2008). The Emergence of Distinctive Features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Miller, George A. (1956). ‘The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information’ Psychological Review 63: 81–97.

(p.229) Mithen, Steven (2005). The Singing Neanderthals: The Origins of Music, Language, Mind, and Body. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Mobbs, Iain (2008). ‘ “Functionalism,” the Design of the Language Faculty, and (Disharmonic) Typology’ MS, Cambridge University.

Mohanan, Karuvannur Puthanveettil (1982). ‘Lexical Phonology’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

—— (1986). The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

—— (2000). ‘The Theoretical Substance of the Optimality Formalism’ Linguistic Review, 17: 143–66.

Moravcsik, Edith A. (1978). ‘Reduplicative Constructions’. In J. H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Human Language. Stanford: Stanford University Press, iii. 297–334.

Morén, Bruce (2007). ‘Minimalist/Substance‐free Feature Theory’ Handouts from the EGG summer school, Brno.

Murphy, Robin A., Mondragon, Esther, and Murphy, Victoria A. (2008). ‘Rule Learning by Rats’ Science 319: 1524–52.

Mutaka, Ngessimo M. (1994). The Lexical Tonology of Kinande. Lincom Studies in African Linguistics 1. Munich and Newcastle: Lincom Europa.

Narita, Hiroki (2009a). ‘Full interpretation of Optimal Labeling’ Biolinguistics 3(2–3): 213–54.

—— (2009b). ‘Multiple Transfer in Service of Recursive Merge’ Paper Presented at GLOW XXXII, Nantes.

—— and Fujita, Koji (2010). ‘A Naturalist Reconstruction of Minimalist and Evolutionary Biolinguistics’ Biolinguistics 4(4): 356–76.

—— and Samuels, Bridget (2009). ‘The H‐α Schema and Phonological Derivation by Phase’ MS, Harvard University and University of Maryland.

Neeleman, Ad, and van de Koot, Hans (2006). ‘On Syntactic and Phonological Representations’ Lingua 116: 1524–52.

Nespor, Marina and Vogel, Irene (1986). Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.

Nevins, Andrew I. (2004). ‘Conditions on (Dis)harmony’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

—— (2010). ‘Two Case Studies in Phonological Universals: A View from Artificial Grammars’ Biolinguistics 4(2): 218–33.

—— and Endress, Ansgar D. (2007). ‘The Edge of Order: Analytic Bias in Ludlings’ Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 43–53.

—— and Vaux, Bert (2003). ‘Metalinguistic, Shmetalinguistic: The Phonology of Shm‐reduplication’ In Proceedings of CLS 39. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 702–21.

Newell, Heather (2008). ‘Aspects of the Morphology and Phonology of Phases’ Ph.D. thesis, McGill University, Montreal, QC.

Newmeyer, Frederick (2005). Possible and Probable Languages: A Generative Perspective on Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Newport, Elissa L., and Aslin, Richard N. (2004). ‘Learning at a Distance I. Statistical Learning of Non‐adjacent Dependencies’ Cognitive Psychology 48: 127–62.

(p.230) Newport, Elissa L., Hauser, Marc D., Spaepen, Geertrui, and Aslin, Richard N. (2004). ‘Learning at a Distance II. Statistical Learning of Non‐adjacent Dependencies in a Non‐human Primate’ Cognitive Psychology 49: 85–117.

Niyogi, Partha (2006). The Computational Nature of Language Learning and Evolution. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

—— and Berwick, Robert C. (1995). ‘The Logical Problem of Language Change’ AI Memo 1516, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.

—— (1997). ‘Evolutionary Consequences of Language Learning’ Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 697–719.

Nunes, Jairo (2004). Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

Odden, David (1987). ‘Kimatuumbi Phrasal Phonology’ Phonology 4: 13–36.

—— (1988). ‘Antiantigemination and the OCP’ Linguistic Inquiry 19: 451–75.

—— (1990). ‘Syntax, Lexical Rules, and Postlexical Rules in Kimatuumbi’ In S. Inke‐ las and D. Zec. (eds.), The Phonology–Syntax Connection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 259–277.

—— (1991). ‘Vowel Geometry’ Phonology 8: 261–89.

—— (1994). ‘Adjacency Parameters in Phonology’ Language 70(2): 289–330.

—— (1996). Kimatuumbi Phonology and Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—— (2003). ‘Review of McCarthy (2002), A Thematic Guide to Optimality TheoryPhonology 20: 163–7.

—— (forthcoming). ‘Rules v. Constraints’ In J. A. Goldsmith, J. Riggle, and A. C. Yu (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. 2nd. edn. Oxford: Blackwell.

Ohala, John J. (1981). ‘The Listener as a Source of Sound Change’ In Papers from the CLS Parasession on Language and Behavior, 178–203.

—— (1990). ‘The Phonetics and Phonology of Aspects of Assimilation’ In J. Kingston and M. E. Beckman (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 258–75.

—— (1992). ‘Alternatives to the Sonority Hierarchy for Explaining Segmental Sequential Constraints’ In Papers from the CLS Parasession on the Syllable, 319–38.

—— and Kawasaki‐Fukumori, Haruko (1997). ‘Alternatives to the Sonority Hierarchy for Explaining Segmental Sequential Constraints’ In S. Eliasson and E. H. Jahr (eds.), Language and its Ecology: Essays in Memory of Einar Haugen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 343–65.

Ohshiba, Nobuaki (1997). ‘Memorization of Serial Items by Japanese Monkeys, a Chimpanzee, and Humans’ Japanese Psychological Research 39: 236–52.

Ortony, Andrew (1993). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ott, Dennis (2008). ‘On Noun Ph(r)ases’ MS. Harvard University.

—— (2009). ‘The Evolution of I‐Language: Lexicalization as the Key Evolutionary Novelty’ Biolinguistics 3(2): 255–69.

(p.231) Oudeyer, Pierre‐Yves (2006). Self‐Organization in the Evolution of Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Padgett, Jaye (1995). ‘Feature Classes’ In J. N. Beckman, L. Walsh Dickey, and S. Urbanczyk (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers: Papers in Opti‐ mality Theory 18. Stanford: CSLI, 385–420.

Pak, Marjorie (2008). ‘The Postsyntactic Derivation and its Phonological Reflexes’ Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Pascalis, Olivier, de Haan, M., and Nelson, Charles A. (2002). ‘Is Face Processing Species‐Specific During the First Year of Life’ Science 296: 1321–3.

Patel, Aniruddh (2008). Language and Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—— and Iversen, J. R. (2006). ‘A Non‐human Animal Can Drum a Steady Beat on a Musical Instrument’ In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, 477.

—— —— Bregman, Micah R., and Schulz, Irena (2009). ‘Experimental Evidence for Synchronization to a Musical Beat in a Nonhuman Animal’ Current Biology 19(10): 1–4.

Paul, Hermann (1880). Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Max Niemeyer.

Payne, Katherine (2000). ‘The Progressively Changing Songs of Humpback Whales: A Window on the Creative Process in a Wild Animal’ In N. Wallin, B. Merker, and S. Brown (eds.), The Origins of Music. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 135–50.

Pesetsky, David (1979). ‘Russian Morphology and Lexical Theory’ MS, MIT.

Phillips, Colin (1999). ‘Categories and Constituents in the Neuroscience of Language’ Paper presented at Keio University, Tokyo.

—— and Lau, Ellen (2004). ‘Foundational Issues’, Review of Jackendoff (2002). Journal of Linguistics 40: 571–91.

Piattelli‐Palmarini, Massimo (1989). ‘Evolution, Selection, and Cognition: from “Learning” to Parameter Setting in Biology and in the Study of Language’ Cognition 31: 1–44.

Pietroski, Paul (2005). Events and Semantic Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Piggott, Glyne, and Newell, Heather (2006). ‘Syllabification, Stress and Derivation by Phase in Ojibwa’ McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 20(1).

Pike, K. L. (1947). Phonemics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Pinker, Steven, and Jackendoff, Ray (2005). ‘The Faculty of Language: What's Special about It?’Cognition 95: 201–36.

Poeppel, David (2005). ‘The Interdisciplinary Study of Language and its Challenges’ Jahrbuch des Wissenschaftkollegs zu Berlin.

—— Idsardi, William J., and van Wassenhove, Virginie (2007). ‘Speech Perception at the Interface of Neurobiology and Linguistics’ Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 363: 1071–86.

Polka, L., and Werker, J.F. (1994). ‘Developmental Changes in Perception of Non‐ native Vowel Contrasts’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20(2): 421–35.

(p.232) Poser, William J. (1982). ‘Why Cases of Syllabic Reduplication Are So Hard to Find’ MS, MIT.

—— (2004). ‘Phonological Writing and Phonological Representation’ Paper presented in the Harvard Linguistic Theory Colloquium.

Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul (1993 [2004]). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.

Pritchett, B. (1984). ‘The Mys‐fuckin‐sterious Behavior of S‐stop Clusters in English Expletive Infixation’ MS, Harvard University.

Pulleyblank, Douglas (2006). ‘Minimizing UG: Constraints upon Constraints’ In D. Baumer, D. Montero, and M. Scanlon (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 25, 15–39. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla.

Pullum, Geoffrey K., and Scholz, Barbara C. (2002). ‘Empirical Assessment of Stimulus Poverty Arguments’ Linguistic Review 19(1–2): 9–50.

Pylkkänen, Liina (2002). ‘Introducing Arguments’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Pylyshyn, Zenon W. (2003). Seeing and Visualizing: It's Not What You Think. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

Radford, Andrew (2000). ‘Children in Search of Perfection: Towards a Minimalist Model of Acquisition’ Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 34. Colchester: University of Essex.

Raimy, Eric (2000a). The Phonology and Morphology of Reduplication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

—— (2000b). ‘Remarks on Backcopying’ Linguistic Inquiry 31(3): 541–52.

—— (2003). ‘Asymmetry and Linearization in Phonology’ In A. M. Di Sciullo (eds.), Asymmetry in Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, ii. 129–46.

—— (2005). ‘Prosodic Residue in an A‐Templatic World’ Paper presented in the Linguistics Colloquium, University of Delaware, 14 October.

—— (2008). ‘Preliminaries to Deriving Syllable Phenomena from Parallel Representations’ Paper presented at the CUNY Phonology Forum Conference on the Syllable.

—— (2009). ‘Deriving Reduplicative Templates in a Modular Fashion’ In E. Raimy and C. Cairns (eds.), Contemporary Views on Architecture and Representations in Phonological Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 383–404.

Ramachandran, V.S., and Blakeslee, Sandra (1998). Phantoms in the Brain: Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind. New York: William Morrow.

Ramus, Franck, Hauser, Marc D., Miller, Cory, Morris, Dylan, and Mehler, Jacques (2000). ‘Language Discrimination by Human Newborns and by Cotton‐top Tamarin Monkeys’ Science 288: 349–51.

Redford, Melissa A. (1999). ‘An Articulatory Basis for the Syllable’ Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas, Austin.

—— Chen, Chun Chi, and Miikkulainen, Risto (2001). ‘Constrained Emergence of Universals and Variation in Syllable Systems’ Language and Speech 44(1): 27–56.

Reiss, Charles (2003a). ‘Quantification in Structural Descriptions: Attested and Unat‐ tested Patterns’ The Linguistic Review 20: 305–38.

(p.233) —— (2003b). ‘Towards a Theory of Fundamental Phonological Relations’ In A. M. Di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, ii. 214–38.

—— (2008a). ‘The OCP and NoBanana’ In B. Vaux and A. I. Nevins (eds.), Rules, Constraints, and Phonological Phenomena. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 252–301.

—— (2008b). ‘SEARCH Algorithm Solves a Problem of Representational Ambiguity’ MS, Concordia University.

—— and Simpson, Marc (2009). ‘Reduplication as Iterated Projection’ Paper presented at GLOW XXXII, Nantes.

Remez, R., Rubin, P., Pisoni, D., and Carrell, T. (1981). ‘Speech Perception Without Traditional Speech Cues’ Science 212: 947–50.

Rice, Curt (2005). ‘Optimal Gaps in Optimal Paradigms’ Catalan Journal of Linguistics 4: 155–70.

Rice, Keren (2008). ‘Review of de Lacy (2006), Markedness: Reduction and Preservation in PhonologyPhonology 25: 361–71.

Richards, Marc (2004). ‘Object Shift, Scrambling, and Symmetrical Syntax’ Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University.

—— (2008). ‘Two kinds of Variation in a Minimalist System’ In F. Heck, G. Müller, and J. Trommer (eds.), Varieties of Competition in Linguistische Arbeits Berichte. Leipzig, Universität Leipzig, 133–62.

—— (forthcoming). ‘Deriving the Edge: What's in a Phase?’ Syntax.

Richards, Norvin (2010). Uttering Trees. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

Rizzi, Luigi (1990). Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

—— (2002). ‘Locality and Left Periphery’ In A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 223–51.

Roberts, Ian (2007). Diachronic Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—— and Holmberg, Anders (2009). ‘Introduction: Parameters in Minimalist Theory’ In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, and M. Sheehan (eds.), Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–57.

Robins, R.H. (1957). ‘Vowel Nasality in Sundanese: A Phonological and Grammatical Study’ Studies in Linguistics, 87–103.

Rose, Sharon (1997). ‘Theoretical Issues in Comparative Ethio‐Semitic Phonology and Morphology’ Ph.D. thesis, McGill University, Montreal.

Saffran, J. R., and Thiessen, E. D. (2003). ‘Pattern Induction by Infant Language Learners’ Developmental Psychology 39: 1926–8.

Sagey, Elizabeth (1990). The Representation of Features and Relations in Nonlinear Phonology. New York: Garland.

Saltzman, I. J., and Garner, W. R. (1948). ‘Reaction Time as a Measure of Span of Attention’ Journal of Psychology 25: 227–41.

Sampson, Geoffrey (2005). The ‘Language Instinct’Debate. London: Continuum.

Samuels, Bridget (2005). ‘Phonological Representation in Akkadian Orthography’ Paper presented at the 3rd Harvard Undergraduate Linguistics Colloquium.

(p.234) Samuels, Bridget (2009a). ‘Structure and Specification in Harmony’ In A. Schardl, M. Walkow, and M. Abdurrahman (eds.) Proceedings of NELS 38. Amherst, Mass., GLSA, ii. 283–96.

—— (2009b). ‘The Structure of Phonological Theory’ Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

—— (2009c). ‘The Third Factor in Phonology’ Biolinguistics 3(2–3): 355–82.

—— (2010a). ‘From Syntax to Phonology: Phi and Phases’ Paper presented at the 18th Manchester Phonology Meeting.

—— (2010b). ‘Phonological Derivation by Phase: Evidence from Basque’ In Proceedings of PLC 33, Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 16.1: 166–75.

—— (2010c). ‘Phonological Forms: From Ferrets to Fingers’ Paper presented at the Language Design Conference, Montreal.

—— (2010d). ‘The Topology of Infixation and Reduplication’ The Linguistic Review 27(2): 131–76.

—— (forthcoming a). ‘Consequences of Phases for Morphophonology’ In Á. J. Gallego. (ed.), Phases: Developing the Framework, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

—— (forthcoming b). ‘Phonological Forms: From Ferrets to Fingers’ In A. M. Di Sci‐ ullo (ed.), Biological Explorations: Interfaces in Language Design.

—— Hauser, Marc D., and Boeckx, Cedric (forthcoming). ‘Do Animals have Universal Grammar? A Case Study in Phonology’ In I. Roberts (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sandler, Wendy (2008a). ‘The Emergence of Prosody and Syntax in a New Sign Language’ Paper presented at PSI2, Berlin.

—— (2008b). ‘Is Phonology Necessary for Language?’Paper presented at the First SignTyp Conference, Storrs, Conn.

—— and Lillo‐Martin, Diane (2005). Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sato, Yosuke (2008). ‘Multiple Spell‐out and Contraction at the Syntax–Phonology Interface’ MS, University of Arizona.

—— (2009a). ‘Nuclear Stress, Cyclicity, and Edge Sensitivity at the Syntax–Phonology Interface’ MS, National University of Singapore.

—— (2009b). ‘Spelling‐out Prosodic Domains: A Multiple Spell‐out Account’ In K. K. Grohmann (ed.), InterPhases: Phase‐theoretic Investigations of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 234–59.

Schachner, Adena, Brady, Timothy F., Pepperberg, Irene M., and Hauser, Marc D. (2009). ‘Spontaneous Motor Entrainment to Music in Multiple Vocal Mimicking Species. Current Biology 19(10): 1–6.

Scheer, Tobias (2004). A Lateral Theory of Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

—— (2008a). ‘Spell Out Your Sister’In Proceedings of WCCFL 27: 379–87.

—— (2008b). ‘Why the Prosodic Hierarchy is a Diacritic and Why the Interface Must be Direct’ In J. M. Hartmann, V. Hegedus, and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Sounds of Silence. Amsterdam: North‐Holland Elsevier, 145–92.

(p.235) —— (forthcoming). How Morpho‐Syntax Talks to Phonology: A Survey of Extra‐ Phonological Information in Phonology Since Trubetzkoy's Grenzsignale. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Schein, Barry (1997). ‘Conjunction Reduction Redux’ MS, University of Southern California.

Schiering, René, Bickel, Balthasar, and Hildebrandt, Kristine A. (2010). ‘The Prosodic Word is not Universal, but Emergent’ Journal of Linguistics 46: 657–709.

Schneider‐Zioga, Patricia, and Vergnaud, Jean‐Roger (2009). ‘Feet and Their Combination’ Paper presented at the CUNY Phonology Forum Conference on the Foot.

Schusterman, Ronald J., and Kastak, David (1993). ‘A California Sea Lion (Zalophus californianus) is Capable of Forming Equivalence Relations’ Psychological Record 43: 823–39.

Ségéral, Philippe, and Scheer, Tobias (2008). ‘Positional Factors in Lenition and For‐ tition’ In J. Brandão de Carvalho, T. Scheer, and P. Ségéral (eds.), Lenition and Fortition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 131–72.

Seidl, Amanda (2000). ‘Minimal Indirect Reference: A Theory of the Syntax– Phonology Interface’ Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

—— (2001). Minimal Indirect Reference: A Theory of the Syntax–Phonology Interface. London: Routledge.

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1978). ‘On Prosodic Structure and its Relation to Syntactic Structure’ In T. Fretheim (ed.), Nordic Prosody. Trondheim: TAPIR, ii. 111–40.

—— (1982). The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

—— (1984). Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

—— (1986). ‘On Derived Domains in Sentence Phonology’ Phonology 3: 371–405.

Shattuck‐Hufnagel, Stefanie (2008). ‘The Syllable in Speech Production Planning’ Paper presented at the CUNY Phonology Forum Conference on the Syllable.

Shettleworth, Sara J. (2010). Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shiobara, Kayono (2009). ‘A Phonological View of Phases’ In K. K. Grohmann (ed.), InterPhases: Phase‐Theoretic Investigations of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 182–201.

Siegel, Dorothy (1974). Topics in English Morphology. New York: Garland.

Slater, Peter J. B. (2000). ‘Birdsong Repertoires: Their Origins and Use’ In N. Wallin, B. Merker, and S. Brown (eds.), The Origins of Music. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 49–64.

Smalley, W.A. (1968). Manual of Articulatory Phonetics. Ann Arbor: Cushing‐Malloy.

Smith, Dinitia (1999). ‘A Thinking Bird or Just Another Birdbrain?’New York Times, 9 October.

Sober, Elliott (1994). ‘No Model, No Inference: A Bayesian Primer on the Grue Problem’ In D. Stalker (ed.), Grue! The New Riddle of Induction. Chicago: Open Court. 225–40.

(p.236) Spelke, Elizabeth (2003). ‘What Makes Us Smart? Core Knowledge and Natural Language’ In D. Gentner and S. Goldin‐Meadow (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 277–311.

Sproat, Richard (1985). ‘On Deriving the Lexicon’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Steriade, Donca (1987). ‘Redundant Values’ In Proceedings of CLS 23, 2: 339–62.

—— (1995). ‘Underspecification and Markedness’ In J. A. Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 114–74.

—— (1999). ‘Alternatives to Syllable‐based Accounts of Consonantal Phonotactics’ MS, University of California, Los Angeles.

—— (2008). ‘Metrical Evidence for an Interlude Theory of Weight’ Paper presented at the CUNY Phonology Forum Conference on the Syllable.

—— (2009). ‘The Phonology of Perceptibility Effects: the P‐Map and its Consequences for Constraint Organization’ In K. Hanson and S. Inkelas (eds.), The Nature of the Word: Studies in Honor of Paul Kiparsky. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 151–79.

Stokoe, William (1960). ‘Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communication of the American Deaf’ Studies in Linguistics 8.

Streeter, L. A. (1976). ‘Kikuyu Labial and Apical Stop Discrimination’ Journal of Phonetics 4: 43–9.

Svenonius, Peter (2004). ‘On the Edge’ In D. Adger, C. de Cat, and G. Tsoulas (eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 259–87.

Swingley, Daniel (2005). ‘Statistical Clustering and the Contents of the Infant Vocabulary’ Cognitive Psychology 50: 86–132.

Tallerman, Maggie (2006). ‘Challenging the Syllabic Model of “Syntax‐as‐it‐is”.’ Lingua 116(5): 689–709.

Taylor, Ryan C., Klein, Barrett A., Stein, Joey, and Ryan, Michael J. (2008). ‘Faux Frogs: Multimodal Signalling and the Value of Robotics in Animal Behavior’ Animal Behaviour 76(3): 1089–97.

ten Cate, Carel, van Heijningen, Caroline A. A., and Zuidema, Willem (2010). ‘Reply to Gentner et al.: As Simple As Possible, but Not Simpler’ PNAS 107: E66–E67.

Tincoff, Ruth, Hauser, Marc D., Tsao, Fritz, Spaepen, Geertrui, Ramus, Franck, and Mehler, Jacques (2005). ‘The Role of Speech Rhythm in Language Discrimination: Further Tests with a Non‐human Primate’ Developmental Science 8: 26–35.

Tokimoto, Naoko, and Okanoya, Kazuo (2004). ‘Spontaneous Construction of “Chinese boxes” by Degus (Octodon degu): A Rudiment of Recursive Intelligence?’ Japanese Psychological Research 46: 255–61.

Toro, José M., Trobalón, Josep B., and Sebastián‐Galles, N. (2005). ‘The Effects of Backward Speech and Speaker Variability in Language Discrimination by Rats’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 31: 95–100.

Travis, Lisa (2010). Inner Aspect: The Articulation of VP. Dordrecht: Springer.

Tremblay, Kelly L., Kraus, Nina, Carrell, Thomas D., and McGee, Therese (1997). ‘Central Auditory System Plasticity: Generalization to Novel Stimuli Following Listening Training’ Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102(6): 3762–73.

(p.237) Truckenbrodt, Hubert (1995). ‘Phonological Phrases: Their Relation to Syntax, Focus, and Prominence’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

—— (1999). ‘On the Relation between Syntactic Phrases and Phonological Phrases’ Linguistic Inquiry 30(2): 219–56.

—— (2007). ‘The Syntax–Phonology Interface’ In P. de Lacy (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 435–56.

Uriagereka, Juan (1998). Rhyme and Reason. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

—— (1999). ‘Multiple Spell‐Out’ In S. D. Epstein and N. Hornstein (eds.), Working Minimalism. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 251–82.

—— (2007). ‘Clarifying the Notion “Parameter”’ Biolinguistics 1: 99–113.

van der Hulst, Harry (2005). ‘Why Phonology is the Same’ In H. Broekhuis, N. Corver, R. Huybregts, U. Kleinherz, and J. Koster (eds.), The Organization of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 252–61.

—— (2007). ‘The Phonological Mobile’ Paper presented at the CUNY Phonology Forum Conference on Precedence Relations.

—— and Ritter, Nancy (2003). ‘Levels, Constraints, and Heads’ In A. M. Di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, ii. 147–88.

van Gelderen, Elly (2007). ‘The Definiteness Cycle in Germanic’ Journal of Germanic Linguistics 19: 275–308.

—— (2008). ‘Where Did Late Merge Go? Grammaticalization as Feature Economy’ Studia Linguistica 62: 287–300.

van Heijningen, Caroline A. A., de Visser, Jos, Zuidema, Willem, and ten Cate, Carel (2009). ‘Simple Rules Can Explain Discrimination of Putative Recursive Syntactic Structures by a Songbird Species’ PNAS 106(48): 20538–43.

van Oostendorp, Marc, and van de Weijer, Jeroen (2005). ‘Phonological Alphabets and the Structure of the Segment’ In M. van Oostendorp and J. van de Weijer (eds.), The Internal Organization of Phonological Segments. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–25.

van Riemsdijk, Henk (2008). ‘Identity Avoidance: OCP Effects in Swiss Relatives’ In R. Freidin, C. Otero, and M.‐L. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean‐Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 227–50.

Vaux, Bert ( 2008). ‘Why the Phonological Component Must be Serial and Rule‐based’ In B. Vaux and A. I. Nevins (eds.), Rules, Constraints, and Phonological Phenomena. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 20–60.

—— (2009a). ‘The Role of Features in a Symbolic Theory of Phonology’ In E. Raimy and C. Cairns (eds.), Contemporary Views on Architecture and Representations in Phonological Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 75–98.

—— (2009b). ‘The Syllable Appendix’ In E. Raimy and C. Cairns (eds.), Contemporary Views on Architecture and Representations in Phonological Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

—— and Samuels, Bridget (2003). ‘Consonant Epenthesis and Hypercorrection’ MS, Harvard University.

—— —— (2005). ‘Laryngeal Markedness and Aspiration’ Phonology 22(4): 395–436.

(p.238) Vennemann, Theo (1972). ‘On the Theory of Syllabic Phonology’ Linguistische Berichte 18: 1–18.

—— (1988). Preference Laws for Syllable Structure and the Explanation of Sound Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Vercelli, Donata (2009). ‘Language in an Epigenetic Framework’ In M. Piattelli‐ Palmarini, J. Uriagereka, and P. Salaburu (eds.), Of Minds and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97–107.

Vihman, M. M., Macken, M. A., Miller, R., Simmons, H., and Miller, J. (1985). ‘From Babbling to Speech: A Re‐assessment of the Continuity Issue’ Language 61: 397–445.

Wagner, Michael (2010). ‘Prosody and Recursion in Coordinate Structures and Beyond’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 183–237.

Walter, Mary Ann (2007). ‘Repetition Avoidance in Human Language’ Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Weikum, Whitney M., Vouloumanos, Athena, Navarra, Jordi, Soto‐Franco, Salvador, Sebastián‐Galles, Núria, and Werker, Janet F. (2007). ‘Visual Language Discrimination in Infancy’ Science 316: 1159.

Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, and Herzog, Marvin I. (1968). ‘Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change’ In W. P. Lehmann (ed.), Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium. Austin: University of Texas Press, 95–195.

Werker, J. F. and Tees, R. C. (1984). ‘Cross‐Language Speech Perception: Evidence for Perceptual Reorganization during the First Year of Life’ Infant Behavior and Development 7: 49–63.

—— and Vouloumanos, Athena (2000). ‘Language: Who's Got Rhythm?’ Science 288(5464): 280–1.

Williams, Heather, and Staples, Kirsten (1992). ‘Syllable Chunking in Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata) Song’ Journal of Comparative Psychology 106(3): 278–86.

Williams, L. (1974). ‘Speech Perception and Production as a Function of Exposure to a Second Language’ Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

Wilson, Colin (2003). ‘Experimental Investigation of Phonological Naturalness’ In Proceedings of WCCFL 22, 533–46.

Wohlgemuth, Melville J., Sober, Samuel J., and Brainard, Michael S. (2010). ‘Linked Control of Syllable Sequence and Phonology in Birdsong’ Journal of Neuroscience 30(39): 12936–49.

Wright, A. A., Rivera, J. J., Hulse, Stewart H., Shyan, M., and Neiworth, J. J. (2000). ‘Music Perception and Octave Generalization in Rhesus Monkeys’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129: 291–307.

Wright, Beverly A. ( 2006). ‘Perceptual Learning of Temporally Based Auditory Skills Thought to be Deficient in Children with Specific Language Impairment’ In S. Greenberg and W. A. Ainsworth (eds.), Listening to Speech: An Auditory Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 303–314.

Yang, Charles D. (2002). Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

(p.239) —— (2004). ‘Universal Grammar, Statistics, or Both’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(10): 451–6.

Yip, Moira (1988). ‘The Obligatory Contour Principle and Phonological Rules: A Loss of Identity’ Linguistic Inquiry 19: 65–100.

—— (2006a). ‘Is There Such a Thing as Animal Phonology?’In Wondering at the Natural Fecundity of Things: Studies in Honor of Alan Prince, 〈http://repositories.cdlib.org/lrc/prince/15〉, accessed 3 May 2011.

—— (2006b). ‘The Search for Phonology in Other Species’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(10): 442–5.

Yu, Alan C. L. (2007). A Natural History of Infixation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zepeda, Ofelia (1983). A Papago Grammar. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

Zoerner, Edward (1995). ‘Coordination: The Syntax of & P’ Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Irvine.