Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of MoralsA Commentary$

Henry E. Allison

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199691531

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691531.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 23 October 2018

(p.364) Bibliography

(p.364) Bibliography

Source:
Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Bibliography references:

Adickes, Erich. Kant und die Als-Ob-Philosophie, Stuttgart: Fr. Frommanns Verlag (1927).

Allison, Henry E. The Kant–Eberhard Controversy, Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press (1973).

—— Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense, New Haven: Yale University Press (1983).

——  “The Concept of Freedom in Kant’s ‘Semi-Critical’ Ethics,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 68 (1986a), 96–115.

——  “Morality and Freedom: Kant’s Reciprocity Thesis,” Philosophical Review 95 (1986b), 393–425.

—— Kant’s Theory of Freedom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1990).

—— Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant’s Theoretical and Practical Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1996).

——  “We Can Act Only Under the Idea of Freedom,” The Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 71 (1997), 39–50.

——  “Ethics, Evil, and Anthropology in Kant: Remarks on Allen Wood’s Kant’s Ethical Thought,” Ethics 111 (2001a), 594–613.

—— Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2001b).

——  “On the Very Idea of a Propensity to Evil,” Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (2002), 337–48.

—— Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense, revised and enlarged edition, New Haven: Yale University Press (2004).

——  “Kant and the Two Dogmas of Rationalism,” in A Companion to Rationalism, ed. Alan Nelson, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing (2005), 343–59.

——  “Kant on Freedom of the Will,” in The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, ed. Paul Guyer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2006a), 381–415.

——  “Kant’s Transcendental Idealism,” in A Companion to Kant, ed. Graham Bird, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing (2006b), 111–24.

——  “Transcendental Realism, Empirical Realism and Transcendental Idealism,” Kantian Review 11 (2006c), 1–28.

——  “Debating Allison on Transcendental Idealism” (response to Allen Wood and Paul Guyer), Kantian Review 12 (2007), 24–39.

—— Custom and Reason in Hume: A Kantian Reading of the First Book of the Treatise, Oxford: Clarendon Press (2008).

Ameriks, Karl. Kant’s Theory of Mind: An Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason, Oxford: Clarendon Press (1982).

——  “Kant on the Good Will,” in Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, Ein kooperativer Kommentar, ed. Otfried Höffe, Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann (1989), 45–65.

—— Interpreting Kant’s Critiques, Oxford: Clarendon Press (2003).

Aune, Bruce. Kant’s Theory of Morals, Princeton: Princeton University Press (1979).

Baker, Judith. “Counting Categorical Imperatives,” Kant-Studien 79 (1988), 389–406.

(p.365) Baron, Marcia. “The Alleged Moral Repugnance of Acting from Duty,” Journal of Philosophy 81 (1984), 197–220.

——  “Freedom, Frailty, and Impurity,” Inquiry 36 (1993), 431–41.

—— Kantian Ethics Almost without Apology, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press (1995).

——  “Acting from Duty (GMS, 397–401),” in Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Christoph Horn and Dieter Schönecker, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter (2006), 72–92.

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Metaphysica, in Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, herausgegeben von der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin and Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter & Co. (1926), vol. 17, 5–206.

—— Initia philosophiae practicae prima acroamatice (1760), reprinted in Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, herausgegeben von der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin and Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter & Co. (1934), vol. 19, 7–91.

Beck, Lewis W. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason, Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1960).

—— Studies in the Philosophy of Kant, Indianapolis, New York, and Kansas City: Bobbs-Merrill Company Inc. (1965).

—— Early German Philosophy, Kant and His Predecessors, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press (1969a).

—— Kant’s Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, Text and Critical Essays, trans. Lewis White Beck and ed. Robert Paul Wolff, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Company Inc. (1969b).

—— The Actor and the Spectator, New Haven: Yale University Press (1975).

Beiser, Frederick C. The Fate of Reason German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1987).

Bennett, Jonathan. Kant’s Analytic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1966).

Bittner, Rüdiger. “Maximen,” in Akten der 4 Internationalen Kant Kongress, Mainz 1974, ed. G. Funke and J. Kopper, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 485–98.

—— Moralisches Gebot oder Autonomie, Freiburg/Munich: Verlag Karl Alber (1983).

—— Das Unternehmen einer Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten,” in Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, Ein kooperativer Kommentar, ed. Otfried Höffe, Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann (1989), 13–30.

Brandt, Reinhard. “Der Zirkel im dritten Abschnitt von Kant’s Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten,” in Kant Analysen-Probleme-Kritik, ed. Hariolf Oberer and Gerhard Seel, Würtburg: Königshausen & Neumann (1988), 169–91.

Brewer, Talbot. “Maxims and Virtues,” Philosophical Review 111 (2002), 539–72.

Carnois, Bernard. The Coherence of Kant’s Doctrine of Freedom, trans. David Booth, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press (1987).

Cicero, Marcus Tullius, De officiis, with English translation by Walter Miller, Loeb Classical Library, London: William Heinemann, New York: The Macmillan Co. (1893).

Cramer, Konrad. “Hypothetische Imperative?” in Rehabilitierung der praktischen Philosophie, vol. 1 ed. Manfred Reidel, Freiburg: Rombach (1972), 159–212.

Crusius, Christian August. “Anweisung vernünftig zu leben.” Die Philosophischen Hauptwerke, vol. 2 Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung (1969).

Darwall, Stephen. The British Moralists and the Internal ‘Ought’: 1640–1740, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1995).

(p.366) Dean, Richard. The Value of Humanity in Kant’s Moral Theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press (2006).

Dennett, Daniel C. “Mechanism and Responsibility,” in Essays on Freedom of Action, ed. Ted Honderich, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (1973), 159–84.

—— Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will worth Wanting, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press (1984).

—— The Intentional Stance, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press (1989).

DesJardins, Gregory. “Terms of De Officiis in Hume and Kant,” Journal of the History of Ideas 28 (1967), 237–42.

Dietrichson, Paul. “Kant’s Criteria of Universalizability,” in Kant: Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, Text and Critical Essays, ed. Robert Paul Wolff, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Company Inc. (1969), 163–207.

Duncan, A. R. C. Practical Reason and Morality: A Study of Immanuel Kant’s Foundations for the Metaphysics of Morals, London, Edinburgh, Paris, Melbourne, Toronto, and New York: Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd. (1957).

Düsing, Klaus. Die Teleologie in Kant’s Weltbegriff, Bonn: H. Bouvier. Co. Verlag (1968).

Eisenberg, Paul. “From the Forbidden to the Supererogatory: The Basic Ethical Categories in Kant’s Tugendlehre,” American Philosophical Quarterly 3 (1966), 255–69.

Engstrom, Stephen. The Form of Practical Knowledge: A Study of the Categorical Imperative, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press (2009).

Fleischacker, Samuel. “Kant and Adam Smith,” Kant-Studien 82 (1991), 249–69.

Foot, Philippa. “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives,” in Virtues and Vices, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press (1981), 157–73.

Freudiger, Jürg. Kants Begründung der praktischen Philosophie, Bern, Stuttgart, Wien: Verlag Paul Haupt (1993).

Fricke, Cristel. Maximen, Recht und Freiheit in der Philosophie Kants, Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, ed. Valerio Rohden, Ricardo R. Terra, Guido A. de Almeida, and Margit Ruffing, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter (2008), vol. 3, 125–35.

Garve, Christian. Abhandlung über die mensclichen Pflichten in drei Büchern aus dem Latinischen des Marcus Tullius Cicero, Übersetzt von Christian Garve, Breslau: Wilhelm Gottlieb Korn, 4th edition (1792a).

——  Philosophische Anmerkungen und Abhandlungen zu Cicero’s Büchern von den Pflichten, Anmerkungen zu dem Ersten Buche, Breslau: Wilhelm Gottlieb Korn (1792b).

——  Uebersicht der vornehmsten Principien der Sittenlehre, von dem Zeitalter des Aristoteles an bis auf unsre Zeiten, Breslau: Wilhelm Gottlieb Korn (1798).

——  Versuche über verschiedene Gegenstände aus der Moral, Literatur und dem gesellschaftlichen Leben (in Henrich, 1967, 134–38).

——  “The Garve Review,” in Kant’s Early Critics: The Empiricist Critique of the Theoretical Philosophy, ed. and trans. Brigitte Sassen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2000), 59–77.

Gibert, Carlos Melches. Der Einfluss von Christian Garves Übersetzung Ciceros “De officiis” auf Kants “Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten,” Regensberg: S. Roderer Verlag, (1994).

Green, T. H. Prolegomena to Ethics, ed. David O. Brink, Oxford: Clarendon Press (2003).

Gregor, Mary J. Laws of Freedom: A Study of Kant’s Method of Applying the Categorical Imperative in the Metaphysik der Sitten, Oxford: Basil Blackwell (1963).

(p.367) Grier, Michelle. Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2001).

Guéroult, Martial. “Canon de la raison pure et critique de la raison pratique,” Revue de Philosophie 8 (1954), 331–57.

Guyer, Paul. “The Possibility of the Categorical Imperative,” in Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Critical Essays, ed. Paul Guyer, New York and Oxford: Roman & Littlefield (1998), 215–46.

Hamann, Johann Georg. Briefwechsel, volume 5, ed. Walther Ziesemer and Arthur Henkel, Frankfurt (Main): Insel Verlag (1965).

Harbison, Warren G. “The Good Will,” Kant-Studien 71 (1980) 47–59.

Hegel, G. W. F. Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller, Oxford: Oxford University Press (1977).

Henrich, Dieter. Kant, Gentz. Rehberg, Über Theorie und Praxis, edited with introduction, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag (1967).

——  “The Proof-Structure of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction,” Review of Metaphysics 22 (1969), 640–59.

——  “Die Deduktion des Sittengesetzes. Über die Grunde der Dunkelheit des letzten Abschnittes von Kants ‘Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten’,” in Denken im Schatten des Nihilismus, ed. Alexander Schwan, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, (1975), 55–112.

——  “The Deduction of the Moral Law: The Reasons for the Obscurity of the Final Section of Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals,” trans. Paul Guyer, in Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Critical Essays, edited Paul Guyer, New York and Oxford: Roman & Littlefield (1998), 303–41.

Henson, Richard. “What Kant Might Have Said: Moral Worth and the Overdetermination of Dutiful Action,” Philosophical Review 88 (1979), 39–54.

Herman, Barbara. “On the Value of Acting from the Motive of Duty,” Philosophical Review 90 (1981), 359–82.

—— The Practice of Moral Judgment, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1993).

Hill, Thomas, E. Jr. Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant’s Moral Theory, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press (1992).

——  “Kant’s Argument for the Rationality of Moral Conduct,” in Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Critical Essays, ed. Paul Guyer, New York and Oxford: Roman & Littlefield (1998), 249–72.

——  (co-ed. with Arnulf Zweig). Kant, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press (2002).

Höffe, Otfried. “Kants kategorischer Imperativ als Kriterium des Sittlichen,” in Ethik und Politik, ed. Otfried Höffe, Frankfurt: Surkamp (1979), 84–119.

Horn, Christoph. “Kant on Ends and Human Agency: The Teleological Argument (GMS, 394–396),” in Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Christoph Horn and Dieter Schönecker, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter (2006), 45–71.

Hume, David. An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. Tom L. Beauchamp, Oxford Philosophical Texts, Oxford: Oxford University Press (1998).

—— An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, ed. Tom L Beauchamp, Oxford Philosophical Texts, Oxford: Oxford University Press (1999).

(p.368) Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. David Fate and Mary J. Norton, Oxford Philosophical Texts, Oxford: Oxford University Press (2000).

Irwin, Terence. “Morality and Personality in Kant and Green,” in Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy, ed. Allen W. Wood, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press (1984), 31–56.

Jacobi, F. H. David Hume über den Glauben, oder Idealismus und Realismus, in Über den transzendentalen Idealismus, Werke, ed. F. Roth and F. Köppen, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft (1968), vol. 2, 291–310.

Kemp, J. “Kant’s Examples of the Categorical Imperative,” in Kant: Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, Text and Critical Essays, ed. Robert Paul Wolff, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Company Inc. (1969), 230–44.

Kerstein, Samuel J. Kant’s Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2002).

——  “Deriving the Formula of Humanity,” in Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Christoph Horn and Dieter Schönecker, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter (2006), 200–21.

Kobusch, Theo. Die Entdeckung der Person. Metaphysik der Freiheit und modernes Menschenbild, Freiburg, Basel, Wien: Herder Verlag (1993).

Köhl, Harald “The Derivation of the Moral Law (GMS, 402, 420f),” in Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Christoph Horn and Dieter Schönecker, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter (2006), 93–117.

Korsgaard, Christine. Creating the Kingdom of Ends, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1996).

Kuehn, Manfred. Kant: A Biography, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2001a).

——  “Kant and Cicero,” in Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung, Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, vol. 3, ed. Volker Gerhardt, Rolf-Peter Horstmann, and Ralph Schumacher, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter (2001b), 270–78.

Laberge, Pierre. “Du passage de la philosophie morale populaire à la métaphysique des mours,” Kant-Studien 71 (1980), 418–44.

——  “L’Espèce de cercle dont, à ce qu’il semble, il n’y pas moyens de sortir,” Dialogue 21 (1982), 745–53.

——  “La Volonte, la representation des lois et la fin,” in Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Ein kooperativer Kommentar, ed. Otrfried Höffe, Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann (1989), 83–96.

Leibniz, G. W. “Monadology,” in Philosophical Essays, trans. and ed. Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber, Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company (1989), 213–25.

Lewis, C. I. An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation, La Salle: Open Court Publishing Co. (1947).

Liddell, Brendan. Kant on the Foundation of Morality: A Modern Version of the ‘Grundlegung’, translated with commentary, Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press (1970).

Ludwig, Bernd. “Kant’s Hypothetical Imperatives,” in Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Christoph Horn and Dieter Schönecker, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter (2006), 139–57.

——  “Kant, Garve, and the Motives of Moral Action,” Journal of Moral Philosophy, 4 (2007), 183–93.

(p.369) Marshall, John. “The Syntheticity of the Categorical Imperative,” in Proceedings of the Sixth International Kant Congress, ed. G. Funke and T. Seebohm, Washington: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology University Press of America (1989) Vol. II/2, 185–200.

McCarthy, Michael H. “Analytic Method and Analytic Propositions in Kant’s Groundwork,” Dialogue 15 (1976), 565–82.

——  Kant’s Application of the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction to Imperatives,” Dialogue 18 (1979), 373–91.

McDowell, John. Mind and World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1994).

Meerbote, Ralf, “Kant on Freedom and the Rational and Morally Good Will,” commentary on Terry Irwin’s, “Morality and Personality in Kant and Green,” in Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy, ed. Allen W. Wood, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press (1984), 57–72.

Meier, Georg, Friedrich. Allgemeine practische Weltweisheit, Halle: Carl Hermann Hemmerde (1764) (reprinted by Georg Olms Verlag AG, Hildesheim, 2006).

Millgram, Elijah. “Does the Categorical Imperative Give Rise to a Contradiction in the Will?” Philosophical Review 112 (2003), 525–60.

Miltz, Bernhard. “Zur Analytizität und Synthetizität der Grundlegung,” Kant-Studien 89 (1998), 188–204.

Muller, Paul. Chr. Garves Moralphilosophie und seine Stellungnahme zu Kants Ethik, Borna-Leipzig: Buchdruckerei Robert Noske (1905).

Nell (O’Neill), Onora. Acting on Principle: An Essay on Kantian Ethics, New York and London: Columbia University Press (1975).

——  (O’Neill). Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1989).

Nietzsche, Friedrich. Beyond Good and Evil, trans. Marianne Cowan, Chicago: Henry Regnery Company (1955).

Nowell-Smith, P. H. Ethics, London: Penguin Books (1954).

Paton, H. J. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, annotated translation and analysis, New York: Harper & Row (1956).

—— The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant’s Moral Philosophy, London: Hutchinson & Co, 3rd edition (1958).

Patzig, Günther. “Die Logischen Formen Praktischer Sätze,” Kant-Studien 56 (1966), 237–51.

Petrus, Klaus. “Kant und Garve, ‘Beschrieene Dunkelheit’ und ‘Seichtigkeit’,” Kant-Studien, 85 (1994), 280–302.

Piper Adrian M. “Kant on the Objectivity of the Moral Law,” in Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls, ed. Andrews Reath, Barbara Herman, and Christine Korsgaard, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1997), 240–69.

Pippin, Robert. Kant’s Theory of Form, New Haven: Yale University Press (1982).

Pogge, Thomas. “The Categorical Imperative,” in Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Critical Essays, ed. Paul Guyer, New York and Oxford: Roman & Littlefield Publishers (1998), 189–213.

Pohlmann, R. “Autonomie,” in Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 1, ed. Joachim Ritter, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft: Darmstadt (1971), 701–19.

Prauss, Gerold. Kant und das Problem der Dinge an sich, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter (1971).

—— Kant über Freiheit als Autonomie, Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann (1983).

(p.370) Quarfood, Marcel. “The Circle and the Two Standpoints,” in Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Christoph Horn and Dieter Schönecker, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter (2006), 285–300.

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press (1971).

—— Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, ed. Barbara Herman, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (2000).

Reath, Andrews. Agency & Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory: Selected Essays, Oxford: Clarendon Press (2006).

Reich, Klaus. “Kant and Greek Ethics (I)” (trans. W. H. Walsh), Mind 48 (1939a), 446–63.

——  “Kant and Greek Ethics (II)” (trans. W. H. Walsh), Mind 48 (1939b), 337–54.

Reinhold, Karl Leonhard. “Erörterung des Begriffs von der Freiheit des Willens,” in Materialien zu Kants Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, Herausgegeben von Rüdiger Bittner und Konrad Cramer, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag (1975a), 252–74.

——  “Einige Bemerkungen über die in der Einleitung zu den ‘Metaphysischen Anfangsgrüunden der Rechtslehre’ von I. Kant aufgestellten Begriffe von der Freiheit des Willens,” in Materialien zu Kants Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, Herausgegeben von Rüdiger Bittner und Konrad Cramer, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag (1975b), 310–24.

Rickless, Samuel C. “From the Good Will to the Formula of the Universal Law,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2004), 554–77.

Ross, Sir David. Kant’s Ethical Theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press (1954).

Rousseau, Jean Jacques. Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality Among Men, in The First and Second Discourses, ed. Roger D. Masters, trans. Roger D. and Judith R. Masters, New York: St. Martin’s Press (1964).

—— On the Social Contract with Geneva Manuscript and Political Economy, ed. Roger D. Masters, trans. Judith R. Masters, New York: St. Martin’s Press (1978).

Sartre, Jean-Paul. The Transcendence of the Ego: An Existentialist Theory of Consciousness, trans. Forrest Williams and Robert Kirkpatrick, New York: The Noonday Press (1957).

Sassen, Brigitte (ed. and trans.). Kant’s Early Critics: The Empiricist Critique of the Theoretical Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2000).

Scarano, Nico “Necessity and Apriority in Kant’s Moral Philosophy: An Interpretation of the Groundwork’s Preface,” in Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Christoph Horn and Dieter Schönecker, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter (2006), 3–22.

Schaper, Eva. “The Kantian Thing-In-Itself as a Philosophical Fiction,” Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1966), 233–43.

——  Studies in Kant’s Aesthetics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (1979).

Schlipp, Paul Arthur. Kant’s Pre-Critical Ethics, 2nd edition, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press (1960).

Schmucker, Josef. Die Ursprünge der Ethik Kants, Meisenheim am Glan: Verlag Anton Hain KG (1961).

Schneewind, J. B. Introduction to Lectures on ethics, ed. Schneewind and Peter Heath, trans. Peter Heath, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1997).

——  The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1998).

(p.371) Schönecker, Dieter. “Zur Analytizität der Grundlegung,” Kant-Studien 87 (1996), 348–54.

——  Kant: Grundlegung III Die Deduktion des kategorischen Imperativs. Freiburg/München: Verlag Karl Alber (1999).

——  “What is the ‘First Proposition’ Regarding Duty in Kant’s Grundlegung?” in Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung, Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, vol. 3, ed. Volker Gerhardt, Rolf-Peter Horstmann, and Ralph Schumacher, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter (2001), 89–95.

—— and Wood, Allen W. Kants “Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten,” Ein einführender Kommentar, 2nd edition, Paderborn, München, Wien, Zürich: Ferdinand Schöningh. (2004).

——  “How is a Categorical Imperative Possible?” in Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Christoph Horn and Dieter Schönecker, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter (2006), 301–23.

Schultz (Schulze, Schultze), Johann, “Zur Rezension von Eberhard’s Magazin (II. Band),” Kants gesammelte Schriften, vol. 20 (1942),400–23. English translation: The Kant-Eberhard Controversy, Appendix B, 171–77.

Seel, Gerhard. “Sind Hypothetische Imperative analytische praktische Sätze?,” in Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Ein kooperativer Kommentar, ed. Otrfried Höffe, Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann (1989), 148–71.

Sellars, Wilfred. Essays in Philosophy and its History, Dordrecht/Boston: D. Reidel (1974).

——  “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind,” reprinted in Knowledge, Mind, and the Given, ed. William deVries and Timm Triplett, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company Inc. (2000).

Sensen, Oliver. “Kant’s Conception of Human Dignity,” Kant-Studien 100 (2009), 309–31.

——  “Dignity and the Formula of Humanity,” in Kant’s “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals”: A Critical Guide, ed. Jens Timmermann, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2010), 102–18.

Sidgwick, Henry. “The Kantian Conception of Free Will,” in Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Lara Denis, Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press Ltd. (2005), 181–87.

Siep, Ludwig. “Wozu Metaphysik der Sitten? Bemerkungen zur Vorrede der Grundlegung,” Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Ein kooperativer Kommentar, ed. Otrfried Höffe, Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann (1989), 31–44.

Silber, John. R. “The Ethical Significance of Kant’s Religion,” in Immanuel Kant’s Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone, trans. Theodore M. Greene and Hoyt H. Hudson, New York and London: Harper Torchbooks (1960), lxxix–cxxxvii.

Smith, Adam. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. D. D. Raphael and A. L. Macfie, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc. (1982).

Strawson, P. F. The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, London: Methuen (1967).

Timmermann, Jens. Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2007a).

——  “Simplicity and Authority: Reflections on Theory and Practice in Kant’s Moral Philosophy,” Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2007b), 167–82.

Timmons, Mark. “Contradictions and the Categorical Imperative,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 66 (1984), 294–312.

(p.372) Timmons, Mark. “The Categorical Imperative and Universalizability,” in Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Christoph Horn and Dieter Schönecker, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter (2006), 158–99.

Vaihinger, Hans. The Philosophy of ‘As If’, trans. C. K. Ogden, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Ltd., 2nd edition (1935).

Van Cleve, Jay. Problems from Kant, Oxford: Oxford University Press (1999).

Ward, Keith, The Development of Kant’s View of Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press (1972).

Willaschek, Marcus. “Practical Reason,” in Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Christoph Horn and Dieter Schönecker, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter (2006), 121–38.

Wolff, Christian. Preliminary Discourse on Philosophy in General, trans. Richard J. Blackwell, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Company Inc. (1963).

—— Vernünfftige Gedancken von der Menschen Thun und Lassen, zu Beförderung ihrer Glückseligkeit, edited with an introduction by Hans Werner Arndt, Hildesheim and New York: Georg Olms Verlag (1976).

—— Philosophia Practica Universalis, Methodo Scientifica Pertractata, ed. Winfred Lenders, Hildesheim and New York: Georg Olms Verlag (1979).

—— Vernünftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, Auch allen Dingen überhaupt, Den Leibhabern der Wahrheit mitgetheilet (1751), reprinted Ann Arbor: UMI (2005).

Wolff, Robert Paul. The Autonomy of Reason: A Commentary on Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, New York: Harper Torchbooks (1973).

Wood, Allen W. “Kant’s Compatibilism,” in Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy, ed. Allen W. Wood, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press (1984), 73–101.

—— Hegel’s Ethical Thought, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press (1990).

——  “Unsociable Sociability: The Anthropological Basis of Kantian Ethics,” Philosophical Topics 19 (1991), 325–51.

—— Kant’s Ethical Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1999).

——  “Humanity as an End in Itself,” in Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Critical Essays, ed. Paul Guyer, New York and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers (1998), 165–88.

——  (trans. and ed.). Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, New Haven and London: Yale University Press (2002).

——  “The Good without Limitation,” in Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Christoph Horn and Dieter Schönecker, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter (2006a), 25–44.

——  “The Supreme Principle of Morality,” in The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, ed. Paul Guyer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2006b), 342–80.

—— Kantian Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2008).

——  “Kant’s Fourth Proposition: The Unsocial Sociability of Human Nature,” in Kant’s Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim: A Critical Guide, ed. Amélie Oksenberg Rorty and James Schmidt, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2009), 112–28.

Zweig, Arnaulf (trans. and ed.). Correspondence, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1999).