Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Aesthetic Mind$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Elisabeth Schellekens and Peter Goldie

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199691517

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691517.001.0001

ContentsFRONT MATTER

Neurology and the New Riddle of Pictorial Style

Chapter:
(p. 391 ) 23 Neurology and the New Riddle of Pictorial Style
Source:
The Aesthetic Mind
Author(s):

Mark Rollins

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691517.003.0024

Three lines of thought argue for an engagement hypothesis regarding pictorial style: the view that styles encourage perceivers to identify depicted objects using their perceptual resources in certain ways. The first view holds that artworks are hypotheses with design properties that make them testable and thus epistemically attractive, analogous to features that make animals attractive as mates. The second is that styles are like ethological triggers, a response to which is conducive to survival by virtue of the food, protection, or knowledge that it provides. The third treats styles as in terms of the perceptual and cognitive resources they tend to elicit; perceptual strategies that prevail in an individual’s brain through a competition for neural resources that is like evolution writ small. I argue that each view is inadequate, but defend a new variation on the third.

Keywords:   pictorial style, neurology, engagement hypothesis, triggers

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .