Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Bullying and Behavioural Conflict at WorkThe Duality of Individual Rights$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Lizzie Barmes

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780199691371

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2016

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691371.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 November 2018

Factual Themes in Case Law about Behavioural Conflict at Work

Factual Themes in Case Law about Behavioural Conflict at Work

Chapter:
(p.103) 4 Factual Themes in Case Law about Behavioural Conflict at Work
Source:
Bullying and Behavioural Conflict at Work
Author(s):

Lizzie Barmes

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691371.003.0004

This chapter explains how the qualitative case law research was undertaken and describes the sample of judgments that were analysed. It relates factual themes in the judgments and the overarching motifs of complexity and adversarialism that were revealed. The first extrapolation is that peculiarities in the subset of cases that come before higher courts must influence the beliefs and attitudes of legal insiders. Second, the case law showed judges working incredibly hard on workplace disputes to arrive at some kind of truth. This is in a context in which working people’s efforts to resolve problems are known often to meet with failure, the small minority who litigate frequently have poor experiences and the judgments showed cases reaching the higher courts even when the underlying claims appeared either obviously meritorious or the opposite. The critical question revealed was whether all the resource and effort that are put into adjudication of individual employment and equality rights could be harnessed to deliver more.

Keywords:   individual rights, judgments, adjudication, complexity, adversarialism, litigation, workplace behaviour, bullying, harassment, socio-legal

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .