Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Politics of UncertaintySustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Andreas Schedler

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199680320

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199680320.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 22 October 2017

Two Levels of Struggle

Two Levels of Struggle

Chapter:
(p.112) 4 Two Levels of Struggle
Source:
The Politics of Uncertainty
Author(s):

Andreas Schedler

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199680320.003.0005

Authoritarian multiparty elections are creative institutions. They constitute the central arena of competition in electoral autocracies. The chapter describes its distinctive institutional structure and political logic. It conceives authoritarian elections as “two-level” games in which parties compete over voter preferences (at the game level) at the same time as they compete over institutional rules (at the meta-game level). Government and opposition are the leading protagonists of these “nested” games. State agents and voters are mediating agents who possess direct access to the production of votes. The chapter lays out the strategic options these actors face. It explains the “hybrid” nature of authoritarian election results, which are the composite result of voter choices and regime manipulation, and describes their structural opacity. As the chapter argues, both levels of the electoral authoritarian game interact in potentially self-defeating ways. The ensuing decision-making dilemmas tend to induce divisive controversies within regime and opposition actors.

Keywords:   authoritarian elections, asymmetric games, nested games, opacity, decision-making dilemmas

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .