Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Politics of UncertaintySustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Andreas Schedler

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199680320

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199680320.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 July 2018

Shaping the Authoritarian Arena

Shaping the Authoritarian Arena

Chapter:
(p.54) 2 Shaping the Authoritarian Arena
Source:
The Politics of Uncertainty
Author(s):

Andreas Schedler

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199680320.003.0003

Electoral autocracies are hybrid regimes. This chapter explains the nature of their hybridity: They combine institutions of domination with formal institutions of representation. Institutions of domination mobilize violence, money, or ideology. Institutions of representation either empower regime agents by dividing state power (legislatures, courts, and federalism). Or they empower regime adversaries by admitting political pluralism (media, civil society, parties, and elections). On paper, electoral authoritarian regimes introduce the entire set of representative institutions that define modern democracy. In practice, they subvert their democratic spirit through institutional manipulation. The chapter outlines their repertoires of manipulative strategies. It concludes, though, by pointing out the limits of manipulation. The “new institutionalism” in the study of authoritarianism has been analyzing formally representative institutions as instruments of authoritarian rule. By contrast, stressing their relative autonomy and inescapable ambivalence, the chapter conceives them as arenas of struggle.

Keywords:   authoritarian institutions, hybrid regimes, domination, representation, manipulation, ambivalence

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .