Criminals in Uniform
This chapter addresses the relationship between the character of the state and the constitution and the justification of harm-causing action. It takes as a starting point the author's debate with Malcolm Thorburn about the Diceyean interpretation of English constitutional law; specifically the way in which we should understand the contrasting moral positions of citizens and public officials with respect to the justifications that they may offer for their harmful actions. It suggests that a defender of the Diceyan doctrine can consistently believe that public officials, or some of them, are in a special moral position because they are officials. By considering the role of police officers in some depth, the special characteristics of official conduct and misconduct are illustrated whilst endorsing a fundamental continuity in the kinds of consideration that are relevant to assessing their conduct and the conduct of ordinary citizens. Such a discussion invites us further to reflect on what it is to be a citizen and how the criminal law should be constituted in the light of such a notion.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.