Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Contemporary House of LordsWestminster Bicameralism Revived$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Meg Russell

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199671564

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671564.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 22 March 2019

Non-legislative Policy Work

Non-legislative Policy Work

Chapter:
(p.201) 8 Non-legislative Policy Work
Source:
The Contemporary House of Lords
Author(s):

Meg Russell

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671564.003.0008

This chapter discusses debates, questions and committee work in the House of Lords. It summarises the procedures for each, and considers their policy impact, drawing attention to similarities and differences from the House of Commons. It shows that questions and debates are less regulated than in the Commons, and can put ministers under expert scrutiny. Likewise, Lords committees (which are 'crosscutting’ rather than shadowing departments) produce expert reports which are often highly regarded. The chapter shows that committees with a constitutional remit - the Constitution Committee, Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee and Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) have become particularly important to the House of Lords’ policy contribution. These committees operate in part through recommendations but also - like debates and questions - through the power of 'anticipated reactions'.

Keywords:   House of Lords, committees, debates, parliamentary questions, European Union Committee, Science and Technology Committee, Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee, Constitution Committee, Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR), anticipated reactions

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .