Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Critical Imagination$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

James Grant

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199661794

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661794.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 21 November 2018

The Dispensability of Metaphor

The Dispensability of Metaphor

Chapter:
(p.125) 5 The Dispensability of Metaphor
Source:
The Critical Imagination
Author(s):

James Grant

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661794.003.0006

This chapter attacks the belief that metaphor is needed in order to think, express, communicate, or discover certain things. This claim is dubbed the ‘Indispensability Thesis’. This thesis is accepted by a variety of metaphysicians, philosophers of language, philosophers of science, philosophers of mathematics, and philosophers of religion. Some aestheticians appeal to it to explain metaphor’s prevalence in critics’ descriptions of artworks and of our responses to them. The chapter argues that recent arguments for metaphor’s indispensability, by Stephen Yablo, Richard Boyd, Elisabeth Camp, and Berys Gaut, are unconvincing. It provides an explanation of why the Indispensability Thesis seems plausible. It also distinguishes it from several related claims about metaphor. Some of these other claims are plausible, and the Indispensability Thesis acquires an air of plausibility when not clearly distinguished from them. The chapter concludes that the thesis is far from obviously true, and has not been supported by convincing arguments.

Keywords:   metaphor, indispensability, paraphrase, yablo, nominalism, walton, make-believe, pretense, theory change, language of criticism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .