Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Oxford Studies in Metaphysics volume 7$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Karen Bennett and Dean W. Zimmerman

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199659081

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659081.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 November 2018

“There sweep great general principles which all the laws seem to follow”

“There sweep great general principles which all the laws seem to follow”

Chapter:
(p.154) 6. “There sweep great general principles which all the laws seem to follow”
Source:
Oxford Studies in Metaphysics volume 7
Author(s):

Marc Lange

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659081.003.0006

This chapter argues that science recognizes an important distinction: between conservation laws as constraints on the fundamental forces there could be, on the one hand, and conservation laws as coincidences of the fundamental forces there happen to be, on the other hand. Whether they are constraints or coincidences would make an important difference to their role in scientific explanations. The distinction between constraints and coincidences applies to other laws besides the conservation laws; this chapter discusses examples from Hertz and Planck. The distinction between constraints and coincidences is ultimately elaborated in terms of the truth of various counterfactual conditionals. Dispositional essentialism (as advocated recently by Bird, Ellis, and Mumford) must portray all conservation laws as coincidences. It thus forecloses options that science has (with good reason) taken seriously ‐‐ which is a serious count against dispositional essentialism.

Keywords:   conservation laws, scientific explanation, dispositions, laws of nature, counterfactual conditionals, Richard Feynman, Heinrich Hertz, Max Planck

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .